视障成人的手脚高估。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.055
Lara A. Coelho , Claudia L.R. Gonzalez , Carolina Tammurello , Claudio Campus , Monica Gori
{"title":"视障成人的手脚高估。","authors":"Lara A. Coelho ,&nbsp;Claudia L.R. Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Carolina Tammurello ,&nbsp;Claudio Campus ,&nbsp;Monica Gori","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has shown that visual impairment results in reduced audio, tactile and proprioceptive ability. One hypothesis is that these issues arise from inaccurate body representations. Few studies have investigated metric body representations in a visually impaired population. We designed an ecologically valid behavioural task in which visually impaired adults haptically explored various sized gloves or shoes. They were asked to indicate if they perceived each clothing item as bigger than the size of their hand or foot. In the post-hoc analyses we fit psychometric curves to the data to extract the point of subjective equality. We then compared the results to age/sex matched controls. We hypothesized the blind participants body representations should be more distorted. Because previous research has shown that females are more likely to overestimate body size, we predicted sex differences in the sighted participants. However, because blind adults have no exposure to visual ideals of body size, we predicted that there would be no sex differences. Our results showed that<!--> <!-->blind participants overestimated their hands and feet<!--> <!-->to a similar degree. Sighted controls overestimated their hands significantly more than their feet. Taken together, our results partially support our hypothesis and suggest that visual deprivation, even for short periods result in hand size overestimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"563 ","pages":"Pages 74-83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand and foot overestimation in visually impaired human adults\",\"authors\":\"Lara A. Coelho ,&nbsp;Claudia L.R. Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Carolina Tammurello ,&nbsp;Claudio Campus ,&nbsp;Monica Gori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous research has shown that visual impairment results in reduced audio, tactile and proprioceptive ability. One hypothesis is that these issues arise from inaccurate body representations. Few studies have investigated metric body representations in a visually impaired population. We designed an ecologically valid behavioural task in which visually impaired adults haptically explored various sized gloves or shoes. They were asked to indicate if they perceived each clothing item as bigger than the size of their hand or foot. In the post-hoc analyses we fit psychometric curves to the data to extract the point of subjective equality. We then compared the results to age/sex matched controls. We hypothesized the blind participants body representations should be more distorted. Because previous research has shown that females are more likely to overestimate body size, we predicted sex differences in the sighted participants. However, because blind adults have no exposure to visual ideals of body size, we predicted that there would be no sex differences. Our results showed that<!--> <!-->blind participants overestimated their hands and feet<!--> <!-->to a similar degree. Sighted controls overestimated their hands significantly more than their feet. Taken together, our results partially support our hypothesis and suggest that visual deprivation, even for short periods result in hand size overestimation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"563 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 74-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452224005803\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452224005803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,视觉障碍会导致听觉、触觉和本体感觉能力下降。一个假设是,这些问题是由不准确的身体表征引起的。很少有研究对视障人群的度量身体表征进行调查。我们设计了一项生态学上有效的行为任务,让视障成年人触觉探索各种尺寸的手套或鞋子。我们要求他们指出是否认为每件衣服都比他们的手或脚的尺寸大。在事后分析中,我们对数据进行了心理测量曲线拟合,以提取主观相等点。然后,我们将结果与年龄/性别匹配的对照组进行比较。我们假设盲人参与者的身体表征应该更加扭曲。由于之前的研究表明女性更容易高估身体尺寸,因此我们预测视力正常的参与者会出现性别差异。然而,由于成年盲人没有接触过身体尺寸的视觉理想,我们预测不会出现性别差异。我们的结果显示,盲人参与者高估自己手脚的程度相似。视力正常的对照组高估手的程度明显高于高估脚的程度。综上所述,我们的结果部分支持了我们的假设,并表明视觉剥夺,即使是短时间的视觉剥夺,也会导致手的尺寸被高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hand and foot overestimation in visually impaired human adults
Previous research has shown that visual impairment results in reduced audio, tactile and proprioceptive ability. One hypothesis is that these issues arise from inaccurate body representations. Few studies have investigated metric body representations in a visually impaired population. We designed an ecologically valid behavioural task in which visually impaired adults haptically explored various sized gloves or shoes. They were asked to indicate if they perceived each clothing item as bigger than the size of their hand or foot. In the post-hoc analyses we fit psychometric curves to the data to extract the point of subjective equality. We then compared the results to age/sex matched controls. We hypothesized the blind participants body representations should be more distorted. Because previous research has shown that females are more likely to overestimate body size, we predicted sex differences in the sighted participants. However, because blind adults have no exposure to visual ideals of body size, we predicted that there would be no sex differences. Our results showed that blind participants overestimated their hands and feet to a similar degree. Sighted controls overestimated their hands significantly more than their feet. Taken together, our results partially support our hypothesis and suggest that visual deprivation, even for short periods result in hand size overestimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Beyond digestion: Exploring how the gut microbiota modulates human social behaviors Serpina3n in neonatal microglia mediates its protective role for damaged adult microglia by alleviating extracellular matrix remodeling-induced tunneling nanotubes degradation in a cell model of traumatic brain injury Dihydromyricetin ameliorates neurotoxicity induced by high glucose through restraining ferroptosis by inhibiting JNK-inflammation pathway in HT22 cells Sex differential effects of early maternal separation on PTSD susceptibility in adult rats accompanied by telomere shortening in the hippocampus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1