Anisa Choudhary, Asma Fikree, James K Ruffle, Kazuya Takahashi, Olafur S Palsson, Imran Aziz, Qasim Aziz
{"title":"根据肠脑相互作用紊乱、合并症和生活质量对活动过度埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征/活动过度谱系障碍患者进行分层的机器学习方法。","authors":"Anisa Choudhary, Asma Fikree, James K Ruffle, Kazuya Takahashi, Olafur S Palsson, Imran Aziz, Qasim Aziz","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A high prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) exist in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). However, it is unknown if clusters of hEDS/HSD patients exist which overlap with different DGBIs and whether this overlap influences presence of comorbidities and quality of life. We aimed to study these knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively collected hEDS/HSD cohort of 1044 individuals were studied. We undertook Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection-enabled (UMAP) dimension reduction to create a representation of nonlinear interactions between hEDS/HSD and DGBIs, from which individuals were stratified into clusters. Somatization, Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS), autonomic symptoms, psychological factors and quality of life were statistically compared between clusters.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 40 ± 13.2 years; 87.8% were female. Patients segregated into three clusters: Cluster 0 (n = 466): hEDS/HSD+ functional foregut disorders (FFD) + irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Cluster 1 (n = 180): hEDS/HSD+ IBS and Cluster 2 (n = 337): hEDS/HSD alone. In cluster 0, we demonstrated increased somatization (p <0.0001), anxiety (p <0.0001), depression (p <0.0001), PoTS prevalence (p = 0.003), autonomic symptoms (p <0.0001) and reduced quality of life (p <0.0001) compared to cluster 2. Cluster 0 had greater comorbidity burden than cluster 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within hEDS/HSD, subgroups exist with a high prevalence of FFD and IBS. These subgroups have a higher prevalence of psychological disorders, dysautonomia and poorer quality of life compared with hEDS/HSD alone. Further research should focus on healthcare utilization, management and prognosis in hEDS/HSD and DGBI overlap.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14957"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning approach to stratify patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders according to disorders of gut brain interaction, comorbidities and quality of life.\",\"authors\":\"Anisa Choudhary, Asma Fikree, James K Ruffle, Kazuya Takahashi, Olafur S Palsson, Imran Aziz, Qasim Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A high prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) exist in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). However, it is unknown if clusters of hEDS/HSD patients exist which overlap with different DGBIs and whether this overlap influences presence of comorbidities and quality of life. We aimed to study these knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively collected hEDS/HSD cohort of 1044 individuals were studied. We undertook Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection-enabled (UMAP) dimension reduction to create a representation of nonlinear interactions between hEDS/HSD and DGBIs, from which individuals were stratified into clusters. Somatization, Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS), autonomic symptoms, psychological factors and quality of life were statistically compared between clusters.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 40 ± 13.2 years; 87.8% were female. Patients segregated into three clusters: Cluster 0 (n = 466): hEDS/HSD+ functional foregut disorders (FFD) + irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Cluster 1 (n = 180): hEDS/HSD+ IBS and Cluster 2 (n = 337): hEDS/HSD alone. In cluster 0, we demonstrated increased somatization (p <0.0001), anxiety (p <0.0001), depression (p <0.0001), PoTS prevalence (p = 0.003), autonomic symptoms (p <0.0001) and reduced quality of life (p <0.0001) compared to cluster 2. Cluster 0 had greater comorbidity burden than cluster 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within hEDS/HSD, subgroups exist with a high prevalence of FFD and IBS. These subgroups have a higher prevalence of psychological disorders, dysautonomia and poorer quality of life compared with hEDS/HSD alone. Further research should focus on healthcare utilization, management and prognosis in hEDS/HSD and DGBI overlap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14957\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A machine learning approach to stratify patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders according to disorders of gut brain interaction, comorbidities and quality of life.
Background: A high prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) exist in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). However, it is unknown if clusters of hEDS/HSD patients exist which overlap with different DGBIs and whether this overlap influences presence of comorbidities and quality of life. We aimed to study these knowledge gaps.
Methods: A prospectively collected hEDS/HSD cohort of 1044 individuals were studied. We undertook Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection-enabled (UMAP) dimension reduction to create a representation of nonlinear interactions between hEDS/HSD and DGBIs, from which individuals were stratified into clusters. Somatization, Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS), autonomic symptoms, psychological factors and quality of life were statistically compared between clusters.
Key results: The mean age of patients was 40 ± 13.2 years; 87.8% were female. Patients segregated into three clusters: Cluster 0 (n = 466): hEDS/HSD+ functional foregut disorders (FFD) + irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Cluster 1 (n = 180): hEDS/HSD+ IBS and Cluster 2 (n = 337): hEDS/HSD alone. In cluster 0, we demonstrated increased somatization (p <0.0001), anxiety (p <0.0001), depression (p <0.0001), PoTS prevalence (p = 0.003), autonomic symptoms (p <0.0001) and reduced quality of life (p <0.0001) compared to cluster 2. Cluster 0 had greater comorbidity burden than cluster 1.
Conclusions: Within hEDS/HSD, subgroups exist with a high prevalence of FFD and IBS. These subgroups have a higher prevalence of psychological disorders, dysautonomia and poorer quality of life compared with hEDS/HSD alone. Further research should focus on healthcare utilization, management and prognosis in hEDS/HSD and DGBI overlap.
期刊介绍:
Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.