动态对比增强磁共振成像与传统磁共振成像在区分鼻窦炎性肌成纤维细胞瘤和鳞状细胞癌方面的附加值。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03498-6
Qi Wang, Xinyan Wang, Hangzhi Liu, Zhen Wang, Junfang Xian
{"title":"动态对比增强磁共振成像与传统磁共振成像在区分鼻窦炎性肌成纤维细胞瘤和鳞状细胞癌方面的附加值。","authors":"Qi Wang, Xinyan Wang, Hangzhi Liu, Zhen Wang, Junfang Xian","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03498-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the additional value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) in differentiation between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the sinonasal cavity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pathologically proven IMT and SCC in the sinonasal region were enrolled in this retrospective study. All participants underwent conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, while a subset of them performed DWI. All the MRI parameters were independently analyzed by two investigators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 patients with IMT and 55 patients with SCC. Significant differences were found in the conventional MR imaging features including mass margin, T2 signal intensity and track sign of maxillary (p < 0.05). For DCE-MRI features, significant differences were found in progressive centripetal continual enhancement and CImax (p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively). A marginal significant difference was found in ADC values between IMT (0.86 ± 0.59) and SCC (1.14 ± 0.25) (p = 0.061). The conventional MRI analysis revealed that the combination of mass margin and track sign of maxillary yielded an accuracy of 81.6%. Using a combination of progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI and track sign of maxillary in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the accuracy was elevated to 92.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incorporation of DCE-MRI features into conventional MRI showed improved diagnostic performance in differentiating IMT from SCC in the sinonasal region. The novel progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI is the most effective feature of IMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Added-value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to conventional MRI for the differentiation between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and squamous cell carcinoma in the sinonasal region.\",\"authors\":\"Qi Wang, Xinyan Wang, Hangzhi Liu, Zhen Wang, Junfang Xian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-024-03498-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the additional value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) in differentiation between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the sinonasal cavity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pathologically proven IMT and SCC in the sinonasal region were enrolled in this retrospective study. All participants underwent conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, while a subset of them performed DWI. All the MRI parameters were independently analyzed by two investigators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study included 21 patients with IMT and 55 patients with SCC. Significant differences were found in the conventional MR imaging features including mass margin, T2 signal intensity and track sign of maxillary (p < 0.05). For DCE-MRI features, significant differences were found in progressive centripetal continual enhancement and CImax (p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively). A marginal significant difference was found in ADC values between IMT (0.86 ± 0.59) and SCC (1.14 ± 0.25) (p = 0.061). The conventional MRI analysis revealed that the combination of mass margin and track sign of maxillary yielded an accuracy of 81.6%. Using a combination of progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI and track sign of maxillary in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the accuracy was elevated to 92.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incorporation of DCE-MRI features into conventional MRI showed improved diagnostic performance in differentiating IMT from SCC in the sinonasal region. The novel progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI is the most effective feature of IMT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03498-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03498-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像(MRI)和弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI)在区分鼻窦腔炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤(IMT)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)方面的附加价值:这项回顾性研究选取了经病理证实的鼻窦区炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤和鳞状细胞癌患者。所有参与者都接受了常规磁共振成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像,其中一部分人还接受了DWI检查。所有磁共振成像参数均由两名研究人员独立分析:这项回顾性研究纳入了 21 名 IMT 患者和 55 名 SCC 患者。在肿块边缘、T2 信号强度和上颌骨径迹征等常规 MR 成像特征方面发现了显著差异(P将 DCE-MRI 特征纳入常规磁共振成像后,在区分鼻窦部位的 IMT 和 SCC 方面显示出更好的诊断性能。DCE-MRI上新颖的进行性向心性持续增强是IMT最有效的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Added-value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to conventional MRI for the differentiation between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and squamous cell carcinoma in the sinonasal region.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the additional value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) in differentiation between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the sinonasal cavity.

Methods: Patients with pathologically proven IMT and SCC in the sinonasal region were enrolled in this retrospective study. All participants underwent conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, while a subset of them performed DWI. All the MRI parameters were independently analyzed by two investigators.

Results: This retrospective study included 21 patients with IMT and 55 patients with SCC. Significant differences were found in the conventional MR imaging features including mass margin, T2 signal intensity and track sign of maxillary (p < 0.05). For DCE-MRI features, significant differences were found in progressive centripetal continual enhancement and CImax (p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively). A marginal significant difference was found in ADC values between IMT (0.86 ± 0.59) and SCC (1.14 ± 0.25) (p = 0.061). The conventional MRI analysis revealed that the combination of mass margin and track sign of maxillary yielded an accuracy of 81.6%. Using a combination of progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI and track sign of maxillary in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the accuracy was elevated to 92.1%.

Conclusion: The incorporation of DCE-MRI features into conventional MRI showed improved diagnostic performance in differentiating IMT from SCC in the sinonasal region. The novel progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI is the most effective feature of IMT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
期刊最新文献
The eagle-wing finding in FP-CIT SPECT, as a characteristic finding in patients with DESH- type iNPH. Fetal torcular pseudomass and development of the dural venous sinuses: insights from 2D TOF MR angiography. Interhypothalamic adhesions: prevalence, structure, and location-based classification map in pediatric patients undergoing MRI. Visualizing the association between the location and prognosis of isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma: a voxel-wise Cox regression analysis with open-source datasets. Peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity: a novel biomarker for white matter damage in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1