解读美国监管框架:肿瘤生物仿制药与参考生物药的比较。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Seminars in oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.08.002
Ankita Tandulje, Priya Varpe, Purva Chaugule, Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi, Saurabh Srivastava
{"title":"解读美国监管框架:肿瘤生物仿制药与参考生物药的比较。","authors":"Ankita Tandulje, Priya Varpe, Purva Chaugule, Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi, Saurabh Srivastava","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biological oncology agents are vital in cancer care, but their exorbitant expenses present obstacles for patients, families, healthcare professionals, and insurance providers. The advent of biosimilars represents a transformative solution, offering more affordable alternatives after the expiration of biologics patents. Biosimilar agents, similar to biological agents in structure, function, safety, and immunogenicity, enhance healthcare accessibility, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. Thus, the safety of biosimilars in clinical settings is of utmost importance. This review provides a detailed overview of the United States (US) regulatory framework for biosimilars along with a comparative analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biosimilar products. The FDA's \"Biosimilar product information\" database and \"FDA's Purple Book\" database were used to retrieve data on approved biosimilars and reference biologicals respectively. The study compares biosimilars and their reference products, examining their physiological action, pharmacokinetics, indications, adverse reactions, and immunogenicity test results and concludes that biosimilars do not have significant variations from their reference biologic products. This analysis will offer critical insights for medical practitioners, clinicians, and patients. It empowers stakeholders to make informed decisions, assessing whether biosimilars offer an equivalent level of safety compared to their reference products. Biosimilars are endorsed as credible substitutes for originator biologics, improving accessibility and affordability in cancer care, and benefiting patients and healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering the US Regulatory Framework: Comparison Between Oncology Biosimilars and Reference Biologics.\",\"authors\":\"Ankita Tandulje, Priya Varpe, Purva Chaugule, Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi, Saurabh Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biological oncology agents are vital in cancer care, but their exorbitant expenses present obstacles for patients, families, healthcare professionals, and insurance providers. The advent of biosimilars represents a transformative solution, offering more affordable alternatives after the expiration of biologics patents. Biosimilar agents, similar to biological agents in structure, function, safety, and immunogenicity, enhance healthcare accessibility, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. Thus, the safety of biosimilars in clinical settings is of utmost importance. This review provides a detailed overview of the United States (US) regulatory framework for biosimilars along with a comparative analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biosimilar products. The FDA's \\\"Biosimilar product information\\\" database and \\\"FDA's Purple Book\\\" database were used to retrieve data on approved biosimilars and reference biologicals respectively. The study compares biosimilars and their reference products, examining their physiological action, pharmacokinetics, indications, adverse reactions, and immunogenicity test results and concludes that biosimilars do not have significant variations from their reference biologic products. This analysis will offer critical insights for medical practitioners, clinicians, and patients. It empowers stakeholders to make informed decisions, assessing whether biosimilars offer an equivalent level of safety compared to their reference products. Biosimilars are endorsed as credible substitutes for originator biologics, improving accessibility and affordability in cancer care, and benefiting patients and healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.08.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤生物制剂在癌症治疗中至关重要,但其高昂的费用给患者、家属、医疗保健专业人员和保险提供商造成了障碍。生物仿制药的出现代表了一种变革性的解决方案,为生物制剂专利到期后的患者提供了更实惠的替代品。生物仿制药在结构、功能、安全性和免疫原性方面与生物制剂相似,可提高医疗保健的可及性、改善疗效并降低成本。因此,生物仿制药在临床环境中的安全性至关重要。本综述详细概述了美国对生物仿制药的监管框架,并对美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的生物仿制药产品进行了比较分析。本研究使用了 FDA 的 "生物仿制药产品信息 "数据库和 "FDA 紫皮书 "数据库,分别检索已获批准的生物仿制药和参比生物制剂的数据。研究比较了生物仿制药及其参照产品,考察了它们的生理作用、药代动力学、适应症、不良反应和免疫原性测试结果,得出结论认为生物仿制药与其参照生物制品没有明显差异。这项分析将为医疗从业人员、临床医生和患者提供重要的见解。它使利益相关者能够做出明智的决定,评估生物仿制药与其参照产品相比是否具有同等的安全性。生物仿制药被认可为原研生物制剂的可靠替代品,提高了癌症治疗的可及性和可负担性,使患者和医疗保健系统受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deciphering the US Regulatory Framework: Comparison Between Oncology Biosimilars and Reference Biologics.

Biological oncology agents are vital in cancer care, but their exorbitant expenses present obstacles for patients, families, healthcare professionals, and insurance providers. The advent of biosimilars represents a transformative solution, offering more affordable alternatives after the expiration of biologics patents. Biosimilar agents, similar to biological agents in structure, function, safety, and immunogenicity, enhance healthcare accessibility, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. Thus, the safety of biosimilars in clinical settings is of utmost importance. This review provides a detailed overview of the United States (US) regulatory framework for biosimilars along with a comparative analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biosimilar products. The FDA's "Biosimilar product information" database and "FDA's Purple Book" database were used to retrieve data on approved biosimilars and reference biologicals respectively. The study compares biosimilars and their reference products, examining their physiological action, pharmacokinetics, indications, adverse reactions, and immunogenicity test results and concludes that biosimilars do not have significant variations from their reference biologic products. This analysis will offer critical insights for medical practitioners, clinicians, and patients. It empowers stakeholders to make informed decisions, assessing whether biosimilars offer an equivalent level of safety compared to their reference products. Biosimilars are endorsed as credible substitutes for originator biologics, improving accessibility and affordability in cancer care, and benefiting patients and healthcare systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
期刊最新文献
Adenocarcinoma on retrorectal cystic hamartoma: An illustrative image for a very rare diagnosis. Efficacy of metformin drug in preventing metabolic syndrome associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Screening Adherence for Second Primary Malignancies in Breast Cancer Survivors: Behaviors, Facilitators, and Barriers to Enhance Quality Care. Deep Myometrial Infiltration leads to a measurable Inflammatory Response in Endometrial Cancer. A Prospective Observational Study. Colorectal cancer in Ethiopia: Epidemiological trends, diagnostic and laboratory capacities, and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1