[检验的 p 值不是零假设为真或假的概率]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Revista de neurologia Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.33588/rn.7910.2024318
C Carazo-Díaz, L Prieto-Valiente
{"title":"[检验的 p 值不是零假设为真或假的概率]。","authors":"C Carazo-Díaz, L Prieto-Valiente","doi":"10.33588/rn.7910.2024318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most common errors made by physicians in all developed countries is to say that the p-value of a test is the probability that the null hypothesis considered in the test is true or false. Eighty percent of those polled in many surveys make this mistake. The p-value of a test is the probability of obtaining a result like the one obtained in the investigation if the null hypothesis is true. The probability of a pregnancy involving three embryos is very small, at 0.00008 (8 in 100,000). In pregnancies with triplets, the probability of a caesarean section being performed is very high, at 0.98 (98%). These are two very different values, and two very different concepts. Saying that 0.98 is the probability of a pregnancy involving triplets would be a serious mistake. We make the same mistake when we say that the p-value of the test is the probability that the null hypothesis is true, or the probability that it is false.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":"79 10","pages":"289-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The p-value of a test is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false].\",\"authors\":\"C Carazo-Díaz, L Prieto-Valiente\",\"doi\":\"10.33588/rn.7910.2024318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One of the most common errors made by physicians in all developed countries is to say that the p-value of a test is the probability that the null hypothesis considered in the test is true or false. Eighty percent of those polled in many surveys make this mistake. The p-value of a test is the probability of obtaining a result like the one obtained in the investigation if the null hypothesis is true. The probability of a pregnancy involving three embryos is very small, at 0.00008 (8 in 100,000). In pregnancies with triplets, the probability of a caesarean section being performed is very high, at 0.98 (98%). These are two very different values, and two very different concepts. Saying that 0.98 is the probability of a pregnancy involving triplets would be a serious mistake. We make the same mistake when we say that the p-value of the test is the probability that the null hypothesis is true, or the probability that it is false.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"volume\":\"79 10\",\"pages\":\"289-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605902/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7910.2024318\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7910.2024318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有发达国家的医生最常犯的错误之一就是认为检验的 p 值就是检验中考虑的零假设为真或为假的概率。在许多调查中,80%的受访者都犯了这个错误。检验的 p 值是在零假设为真的情况下得到与调查中得到的结果相同的结果的概率。涉及三个胚胎的怀孕概率非常小,仅为 0.00008(十万分之八)。在三胞胎妊娠中,进行剖腹产的概率非常高,为 0.98(98%)。这是两个截然不同的数值,也是两个截然不同的概念。如果说 0.98 是涉及三胞胎的怀孕概率,那将是一个严重的错误。当我们说检验的 p 值是零假设为真的概率或假的概率时,我们也犯了同样的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The p-value of a test is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false].

One of the most common errors made by physicians in all developed countries is to say that the p-value of a test is the probability that the null hypothesis considered in the test is true or false. Eighty percent of those polled in many surveys make this mistake. The p-value of a test is the probability of obtaining a result like the one obtained in the investigation if the null hypothesis is true. The probability of a pregnancy involving three embryos is very small, at 0.00008 (8 in 100,000). In pregnancies with triplets, the probability of a caesarean section being performed is very high, at 0.98 (98%). These are two very different values, and two very different concepts. Saying that 0.98 is the probability of a pregnancy involving triplets would be a serious mistake. We make the same mistake when we say that the p-value of the test is the probability that the null hypothesis is true, or the probability that it is false.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Boxing Training on Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Referral Profile of Adult Patients Attended in the Neuropsychology Consultation at Hospital Universitario La Paz in Madrid from 2018 to 2023]. [Characteristics of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary hospital]. [Glioblastoma and its interaction with neurogenesis]. [The p-value of a test is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1