Thalia P Nicholson, Rory A Pfund, Meredith K Ginley
{"title":"针对执法人员的减少心理健康污名化培训的系统性回顾。","authors":"Thalia P Nicholson, Rory A Pfund, Meredith K Ginley","doi":"10.1037/ser0000915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the outcome of law enforcement officer (LEO) trainings on mental health (MH) stigma and other outcomes. A systematic search of Pubmed, APA PsycInfo, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies examining MH stigma trainings implemented within the LEO profession. Both randomized and nonrandomized studies were considered. Risk of bias was assessed via the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Study of Intervention (Version 2). The present review identified 18 studies comprised of 2,399 participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 37.37, <i>SD</i> = 4.76). Samples were predominantly composed of police officers (<i>k</i> = 16), followed by correctional officers (<i>k</i> = 2) and both (<i>k</i> = 1). Although the review aimed to investigate trainings targeting institutional, public, and self-stigma, all studies implemented trainings intended to decrease public stigma. Outcomes evaluated across studies included attitudes toward MH, knowledge about MH, self-efficacy/confidence, behavioral responses/de-escalation skills, social distance, and awareness, support, and utilization of MH resources. Although the outcomes evaluated were somewhat consistent across studies, there was variability in how variables were defined and measured. Due to this, data could not be compared across studies, and thus, conclusions could not be drawn regarding which trainings demonstrated the most effectiveness in reducing MH. Despite the increased research investigating the outcomes of trainings on stigma within the LEO population, the variability in methodology and the high rate of bias exhibited across studies suggest that more rigorous and better quality evaluations are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of mental health stigma reduction trainings for law enforcement officers.\",\"authors\":\"Thalia P Nicholson, Rory A Pfund, Meredith K Ginley\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the outcome of law enforcement officer (LEO) trainings on mental health (MH) stigma and other outcomes. A systematic search of Pubmed, APA PsycInfo, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies examining MH stigma trainings implemented within the LEO profession. Both randomized and nonrandomized studies were considered. Risk of bias was assessed via the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Study of Intervention (Version 2). The present review identified 18 studies comprised of 2,399 participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 37.37, <i>SD</i> = 4.76). Samples were predominantly composed of police officers (<i>k</i> = 16), followed by correctional officers (<i>k</i> = 2) and both (<i>k</i> = 1). Although the review aimed to investigate trainings targeting institutional, public, and self-stigma, all studies implemented trainings intended to decrease public stigma. Outcomes evaluated across studies included attitudes toward MH, knowledge about MH, self-efficacy/confidence, behavioral responses/de-escalation skills, social distance, and awareness, support, and utilization of MH resources. Although the outcomes evaluated were somewhat consistent across studies, there was variability in how variables were defined and measured. Due to this, data could not be compared across studies, and thus, conclusions could not be drawn regarding which trainings demonstrated the most effectiveness in reducing MH. Despite the increased research investigating the outcomes of trainings on stigma within the LEO population, the variability in methodology and the high rate of bias exhibited across studies suggest that more rigorous and better quality evaluations are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000915\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统综述旨在评估执法人员(LEO)培训对心理健康(MH)污名化和其他结果的影响。我们对 Pubmed、APA PsycInfo 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 进行了系统性检索,以确定有关在执法人员职业中开展心理健康污名化培训的研究。随机和非随机研究均在考虑之列。通过科克伦随机试验偏倚风险工具和非随机干预研究偏倚风险(第 2 版)对偏倚风险进行了评估。本综述确定了 18 项研究,共有 2399 名参与者(Mage = 37.37,SD = 4.76)。样本主要由警官组成(k = 16),其次是惩教人员(k = 2)和两者(k = 1)。尽管该研究旨在调查针对机构、公众和自我污名化的培训,但所有研究都实施了旨在减少公众污名化的培训。各项研究评估的结果包括对心理健康的态度、心理健康知识、自我效能/自信、行为反应/降级技能、社会距离以及对心理健康资源的认识、支持和利用。尽管各项研究评估的结果在某种程度上是一致的,但变量的定义和测量方法却存在差异。因此,无法对不同研究的数据进行比较,也就无法得出哪些培训在减少心理健康方面最有效的结论。尽管有越来越多的研究调查了在 LEO 群体中开展污名化培训的结果,但研究方法的多变性和各研究之间表现出的高偏差率表明,需要进行更严格和更高质量的评估。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
A systematic review of mental health stigma reduction trainings for law enforcement officers.
The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the outcome of law enforcement officer (LEO) trainings on mental health (MH) stigma and other outcomes. A systematic search of Pubmed, APA PsycInfo, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies examining MH stigma trainings implemented within the LEO profession. Both randomized and nonrandomized studies were considered. Risk of bias was assessed via the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Study of Intervention (Version 2). The present review identified 18 studies comprised of 2,399 participants (Mage = 37.37, SD = 4.76). Samples were predominantly composed of police officers (k = 16), followed by correctional officers (k = 2) and both (k = 1). Although the review aimed to investigate trainings targeting institutional, public, and self-stigma, all studies implemented trainings intended to decrease public stigma. Outcomes evaluated across studies included attitudes toward MH, knowledge about MH, self-efficacy/confidence, behavioral responses/de-escalation skills, social distance, and awareness, support, and utilization of MH resources. Although the outcomes evaluated were somewhat consistent across studies, there was variability in how variables were defined and measured. Due to this, data could not be compared across studies, and thus, conclusions could not be drawn regarding which trainings demonstrated the most effectiveness in reducing MH. Despite the increased research investigating the outcomes of trainings on stigma within the LEO population, the variability in methodology and the high rate of bias exhibited across studies suggest that more rigorous and better quality evaluations are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.