虚拟神经学调查:影响安大略省神经科医生使用虚拟医疗的因素。

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241293165
Sabrina Campbell, Monish Ahluwalia, Jamsheed Desai, Houman Khosravani, Sara B Mitchell, Charles D Kassardjian
{"title":"虚拟神经学调查:影响安大略省神经科医生使用虚拟医疗的因素。","authors":"Sabrina Campbell, Monish Ahluwalia, Jamsheed Desai, Houman Khosravani, Sara B Mitchell, Charles D Kassardjian","doi":"10.1177/20503121241293165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Current virtual care guidance lacks specialty-specific considerations. Neurological care is unique due to its reliance on physical examination and complex patient population. Our aim was to determine which factors impact virtual care suitability in neurology, virtual care adoption patterns, and satisfaction with virtual care among neurologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were sent to Ontario neurologists through a shared email from September to November 2021. The survey consisted of four parts: demographics, virtual care adoption patterns, factors influencing virtual care use, and physician satisfaction with virtual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six of 380 (17.4%) neurologists completed the survey. The pandemic resulted in a substantial increase in virtual care use, from 1.6% of all ambulatory visits in 2019 to 70.6% in 2020. Video teleconferencing was considered more appropriate across a broader range of presentations than phone visits, with both methods more suited to follow-ups. Neurologists were largely satisfied with virtual care except for the virtual neurological examination. The neurological presentations identified as least amenable to virtual consultation were movement disorders, limb weakness, gait/balance changes, and vision changes. Four presentations were felt to be most amenable to virtual care: sleep disorders, seizure, headache, and dizziness/syncope. Factors that were felt to reduce virtual care suitability included discussion of sensitive topics and acute presentations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neurologists were satisfied with virtual care as a means of providing outpatient care, though the specific reason for referral influenced perceived appropriateness. These results can inform the basis of the development of consensus guidelines for virtual care provision in neurology.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"20503121241293165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual neurology survey: Factors influencing virtual care use among Ontario neurologists.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Campbell, Monish Ahluwalia, Jamsheed Desai, Houman Khosravani, Sara B Mitchell, Charles D Kassardjian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20503121241293165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Current virtual care guidance lacks specialty-specific considerations. Neurological care is unique due to its reliance on physical examination and complex patient population. Our aim was to determine which factors impact virtual care suitability in neurology, virtual care adoption patterns, and satisfaction with virtual care among neurologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were sent to Ontario neurologists through a shared email from September to November 2021. The survey consisted of four parts: demographics, virtual care adoption patterns, factors influencing virtual care use, and physician satisfaction with virtual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six of 380 (17.4%) neurologists completed the survey. The pandemic resulted in a substantial increase in virtual care use, from 1.6% of all ambulatory visits in 2019 to 70.6% in 2020. Video teleconferencing was considered more appropriate across a broader range of presentations than phone visits, with both methods more suited to follow-ups. Neurologists were largely satisfied with virtual care except for the virtual neurological examination. The neurological presentations identified as least amenable to virtual consultation were movement disorders, limb weakness, gait/balance changes, and vision changes. Four presentations were felt to be most amenable to virtual care: sleep disorders, seizure, headache, and dizziness/syncope. Factors that were felt to reduce virtual care suitability included discussion of sensitive topics and acute presentations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neurologists were satisfied with virtual care as a means of providing outpatient care, though the specific reason for referral influenced perceived appropriateness. These results can inform the basis of the development of consensus guidelines for virtual care provision in neurology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20503121241293165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241293165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241293165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:目前的虚拟护理指南缺乏针对特定专科的考虑因素。神经科护理因其对体格检查的依赖性和复杂的患者群体而独具特色。我们的目的是确定哪些因素会影响神经科虚拟医疗的适用性、虚拟医疗的采用模式以及神经科医生对虚拟医疗的满意度:从 2021 年 9 月到 11 月,我们通过共享电子邮件向安大略省的神经科医生发送了调查问卷。调查包括四个部分:人口统计学、虚拟医疗采用模式、影响虚拟医疗使用的因素以及医生对虚拟医疗的满意度:380 名神经科医生中有 66 名(17.4%)完成了调查。大流行导致虚拟医疗的使用大幅增加,从 2019 年占所有门诊的 1.6% 增加到 2020 年的 70.6%。与电话访问相比,视频远程会议被认为更适用于更广泛的病症,而这两种方法都更适用于随访。除虚拟神经检查外,神经科医生对虚拟医疗基本满意。被认为最不适合虚拟会诊的神经系统症状是运动障碍、四肢无力、步态/平衡改变和视力改变。有四种情况被认为最适合虚拟诊疗:睡眠障碍、癫痫发作、头痛和头晕/晕厥。认为降低虚拟医疗适用性的因素包括讨论敏感话题和急性病症:神经科医生对虚拟医疗作为提供门诊医疗服务的一种手段表示满意,但转诊的具体原因会影响其适宜性。这些结果可为制定神经内科虚拟医疗共识指南提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virtual neurology survey: Factors influencing virtual care use among Ontario neurologists.

Background and objectives: Current virtual care guidance lacks specialty-specific considerations. Neurological care is unique due to its reliance on physical examination and complex patient population. Our aim was to determine which factors impact virtual care suitability in neurology, virtual care adoption patterns, and satisfaction with virtual care among neurologists.

Methods: Surveys were sent to Ontario neurologists through a shared email from September to November 2021. The survey consisted of four parts: demographics, virtual care adoption patterns, factors influencing virtual care use, and physician satisfaction with virtual care.

Results: Sixty-six of 380 (17.4%) neurologists completed the survey. The pandemic resulted in a substantial increase in virtual care use, from 1.6% of all ambulatory visits in 2019 to 70.6% in 2020. Video teleconferencing was considered more appropriate across a broader range of presentations than phone visits, with both methods more suited to follow-ups. Neurologists were largely satisfied with virtual care except for the virtual neurological examination. The neurological presentations identified as least amenable to virtual consultation were movement disorders, limb weakness, gait/balance changes, and vision changes. Four presentations were felt to be most amenable to virtual care: sleep disorders, seizure, headache, and dizziness/syncope. Factors that were felt to reduce virtual care suitability included discussion of sensitive topics and acute presentations.

Conclusion: Neurologists were satisfied with virtual care as a means of providing outpatient care, though the specific reason for referral influenced perceived appropriateness. These results can inform the basis of the development of consensus guidelines for virtual care provision in neurology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Posterior cardiac drain for atrial fibrillation after aortic valve replacement. The pattern of antibiotic resistance and distribution of the biofilm-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PelD, PslB) isolated from infectious hospital departments. Fertility desire and associated factors among antiretroviral therapy users in South Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022. A comprehensive review of diagnosis and management of alcohol-associated hepatitis. A nursing-led sepsis response team guiding resuscitation with point-of-care ultrasound: A review and model for improving bundle compliance while individualizing sepsis care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1