美国葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者的医疗保险、就医机会和治疗效果之间的关系。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Seminars in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1080/08820538.2024.2426479
Victoria A Marks, Basil K Williams, Michael S Leapman, Carol L Shields
{"title":"美国葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者的医疗保险、就医机会和治疗效果之间的关系。","authors":"Victoria A Marks, Basil K Williams, Michael S Leapman, Carol L Shields","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2426479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between insurance status and uveal melanoma (UM) care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with UM from 2004 to 2017. We examined the associations between patient sociodemographic characteristics, specifically insurance status, and UM care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7677 patients, 50% had private, 41% Medicare, 4% Medicaid, 3% other government, and 3% no insurance. Most initially received brachytherapy (66%), followed by enucleation/resection (19%) and other treatment (15%). Compared to private, Medicaid and no insurance were associated with higher odds of late-stage disease presentation (<i>p</i> < .05). Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and no insurance had higher odds of enucleation/resection and lower odds of brachytherapy versus enucleation/resection (<i>p</i> < .05 for all). Medicaid and no insurance were associated with lower odds of other treatment versus enucleation/resection (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access barriers to UM care may exist based on insurance status and may be associated with later-stage presentation and more radical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Medical Insurance, Access to Care, and Outcomes for Patients with Uveal Melanoma in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria A Marks, Basil K Williams, Michael S Leapman, Carol L Shields\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2024.2426479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between insurance status and uveal melanoma (UM) care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with UM from 2004 to 2017. We examined the associations between patient sociodemographic characteristics, specifically insurance status, and UM care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7677 patients, 50% had private, 41% Medicare, 4% Medicaid, 3% other government, and 3% no insurance. Most initially received brachytherapy (66%), followed by enucleation/resection (19%) and other treatment (15%). Compared to private, Medicaid and no insurance were associated with higher odds of late-stage disease presentation (<i>p</i> < .05). Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and no insurance had higher odds of enucleation/resection and lower odds of brachytherapy versus enucleation/resection (<i>p</i> < .05 for all). Medicaid and no insurance were associated with lower odds of other treatment versus enucleation/resection (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access barriers to UM care may exist based on insurance status and may be associated with later-stage presentation and more radical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2426479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2426479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究保险状况与葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)治疗之间的关联:我们利用国家癌症数据库识别了2004年至2017年期间确诊为葡萄膜黑色素瘤的患者。我们研究了患者社会人口学特征(尤其是保险状况)与 UM 治疗之间的关联:在7677名患者中,50%有私人保险,41%有医疗保险,4%有医疗补助,3%有其他政府保险,3%没有保险。大多数患者最初接受的是近距离放射治疗(66%),其次是去核/切除术(19%)和其他治疗(15%)。与私人保险相比,医疗补助和无保险与疾病晚期发病率较高有关(p p p 结论:获得铀矿治疗的障碍可能因保险状况而存在,并可能与晚期发病和更彻底的治疗有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Association Between Medical Insurance, Access to Care, and Outcomes for Patients with Uveal Melanoma in the United States.

Purpose: To investigate the association between insurance status and uveal melanoma (UM) care.

Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with UM from 2004 to 2017. We examined the associations between patient sociodemographic characteristics, specifically insurance status, and UM care.

Results: Of 7677 patients, 50% had private, 41% Medicare, 4% Medicaid, 3% other government, and 3% no insurance. Most initially received brachytherapy (66%), followed by enucleation/resection (19%) and other treatment (15%). Compared to private, Medicaid and no insurance were associated with higher odds of late-stage disease presentation (p < .05). Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and no insurance had higher odds of enucleation/resection and lower odds of brachytherapy versus enucleation/resection (p < .05 for all). Medicaid and no insurance were associated with lower odds of other treatment versus enucleation/resection (p < .05).

Conclusions: Access barriers to UM care may exist based on insurance status and may be associated with later-stage presentation and more radical treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
期刊最新文献
Susac Syndrome: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Management with an Emphasis on Ophthalmic Involvement. Tear Film and Dry Eye Characteristics as Predictors of Photophobia in 374 Patients with Dry Eye Disease. Risk Factors for Eye and Orbital Injuries Related to Electric Scooters and Off-Road Vehicles. Lacrimal History - Part VII: Doyens of Dacryology Series - The Contributions from the Anatomical School of Padua: Andreas Vesalius, Gabriele Falloppio, and Giovanni Battista Morgagni. Recent Progression of Pathogenesis and Treatment for Diabetic Cataracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1