在新加坡,对HER2阳性乳腺癌患者在家皮下注射曲妥珠单抗与静脉注射曲妥珠单抗进行成本最小化分析比较。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359241293381
Yanting Ouyang, Han Yi Lee, Fun Loon Leong, Han Jieh Tey, Vivianne Shih, Elaine Hsuen Lim, Nicholas Graves
{"title":"在新加坡,对HER2阳性乳腺癌患者在家皮下注射曲妥珠单抗与静脉注射曲妥珠单抗进行成本最小化分析比较。","authors":"Yanting Ouyang, Han Yi Lee, Fun Loon Leong, Han Jieh Tey, Vivianne Shih, Elaine Hsuen Lim, Nicholas Graves","doi":"10.1177/17588359241293381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trastuzumab (Herceptin) can be administered intravenously (IV Herceptin) and subcutaneously, with similar efficacy and safety, but with differences in dosage and costs. Previous studies have evaluated the costs of both treatment approaches in the outpatient settings, but no study has compared the costs of IV Herceptin administered in outpatients with subcutaneous Herceptin administered at patients' homes (Homecare SC Herceptin).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the per-patient costs of Homecare SC Herceptin versus IV Herceptin administered in a healthcare institution's outpatient setting in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>We performed a model-based cost-minimization analysis to estimate and compare the per-patient annual costs associated with each treatment modality from a societal perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Direct cost comprised healthcare resources utilization: drug, consumables, manpower, facility and cardiac assessment. Indirect cost was valued using a human capital approach to account for productivity lost by patients. Monte Carlo simulations with 1000 iterations were performed to account for parameter uncertainties. Costs were reported in 2023 Singapore dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The annual societal cost per patient receiving IV Herceptin ranged from S$64,194 to S$65,135, while for Homecare SC Herceptin, it ranged from S$25,865 to S$26,807. Homecare SC Herceptin reduced the annual cost burden by 58.8% and 59.7%, per non-metastatic and metastatic breast cancer patient, respectively. The primary cost contributor was drug therapy, comprising more than 90% of the total cost. Even when excluding the cost of drugs, Homecare SC Herceptin remained cheaper by S$1912 annually. The cost reduction is approximately 60% compared to IV Herceptin regardless of disease status, with a 100% probability that the decision to adopt Homecare SC Herceptin leads to cost savings in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment of breast cancer with Homecare SC Herceptin is a cost-saving option compared to IV Herceptin.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17588359241293381"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-minimization analysis comparing subcutaneous trastuzumab at home with intravenous trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer in Singapore.\",\"authors\":\"Yanting Ouyang, Han Yi Lee, Fun Loon Leong, Han Jieh Tey, Vivianne Shih, Elaine Hsuen Lim, Nicholas Graves\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359241293381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trastuzumab (Herceptin) can be administered intravenously (IV Herceptin) and subcutaneously, with similar efficacy and safety, but with differences in dosage and costs. Previous studies have evaluated the costs of both treatment approaches in the outpatient settings, but no study has compared the costs of IV Herceptin administered in outpatients with subcutaneous Herceptin administered at patients' homes (Homecare SC Herceptin).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the per-patient costs of Homecare SC Herceptin versus IV Herceptin administered in a healthcare institution's outpatient setting in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>We performed a model-based cost-minimization analysis to estimate and compare the per-patient annual costs associated with each treatment modality from a societal perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Direct cost comprised healthcare resources utilization: drug, consumables, manpower, facility and cardiac assessment. Indirect cost was valued using a human capital approach to account for productivity lost by patients. Monte Carlo simulations with 1000 iterations were performed to account for parameter uncertainties. Costs were reported in 2023 Singapore dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The annual societal cost per patient receiving IV Herceptin ranged from S$64,194 to S$65,135, while for Homecare SC Herceptin, it ranged from S$25,865 to S$26,807. Homecare SC Herceptin reduced the annual cost burden by 58.8% and 59.7%, per non-metastatic and metastatic breast cancer patient, respectively. The primary cost contributor was drug therapy, comprising more than 90% of the total cost. Even when excluding the cost of drugs, Homecare SC Herceptin remained cheaper by S$1912 annually. The cost reduction is approximately 60% compared to IV Herceptin regardless of disease status, with a 100% probability that the decision to adopt Homecare SC Herceptin leads to cost savings in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment of breast cancer with Homecare SC Herceptin is a cost-saving option compared to IV Herceptin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17588359241293381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241293381\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241293381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:曲妥珠单抗(赫赛汀曲妥珠单抗(赫赛汀)可静脉注射(静脉注射赫赛汀)和皮下注射,疗效和安全性相似,但剂量和成本不同。以往的研究对门诊两种治疗方法的成本进行了评估,但还没有研究对门诊患者静脉注射赫赛汀与患者家中皮下注射赫赛汀(Homecare SC Herceptin)的成本进行比较:本研究旨在比较家庭护理皮下注射赫赛汀与在新加坡医疗机构门诊环境中静脉注射赫赛汀的患者人均成本:设计:我们进行了基于模型的成本最小化分析,从社会角度估算并比较了每种治疗方式的人均年度成本:直接成本包括医疗资源使用:药物、耗材、人力、设施和心脏评估。间接成本采用人力资本法进行估算,以考虑患者损失的生产力。为考虑参数的不确定性,进行了 1000 次迭代的蒙特卡罗模拟。成本以 2023 年新加坡元为单位:每位接受静脉注射赫赛汀治疗的患者每年的社会成本从64194新元到65135新元不等,而接受家庭护理SC赫赛汀治疗的患者每年的社会成本从25865新元到26807新元不等。每名非转移性乳腺癌患者和转移性乳腺癌患者的家庭护理 SC 赫赛汀年度成本负担分别降低了 58.8% 和 59.7%。主要费用来源是药物治疗,占总费用的 90% 以上。即使不考虑药物成本,Homecare SC 赫赛汀每年仍可节省 1912 新加坡元。与静脉注射赫赛汀相比,无论疾病状况如何,成本都降低了约60%,在新加坡,决定采用Homecare SC赫赛汀节省成本的可能性为100%:结论:与静脉注射赫赛汀相比,使用家庭护理型 SC 赫赛汀治疗乳腺癌可节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-minimization analysis comparing subcutaneous trastuzumab at home with intravenous trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer in Singapore.

Background: Trastuzumab (Herceptin) can be administered intravenously (IV Herceptin) and subcutaneously, with similar efficacy and safety, but with differences in dosage and costs. Previous studies have evaluated the costs of both treatment approaches in the outpatient settings, but no study has compared the costs of IV Herceptin administered in outpatients with subcutaneous Herceptin administered at patients' homes (Homecare SC Herceptin).

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the per-patient costs of Homecare SC Herceptin versus IV Herceptin administered in a healthcare institution's outpatient setting in Singapore.

Designs: We performed a model-based cost-minimization analysis to estimate and compare the per-patient annual costs associated with each treatment modality from a societal perspective.

Methods: Direct cost comprised healthcare resources utilization: drug, consumables, manpower, facility and cardiac assessment. Indirect cost was valued using a human capital approach to account for productivity lost by patients. Monte Carlo simulations with 1000 iterations were performed to account for parameter uncertainties. Costs were reported in 2023 Singapore dollars.

Results: The annual societal cost per patient receiving IV Herceptin ranged from S$64,194 to S$65,135, while for Homecare SC Herceptin, it ranged from S$25,865 to S$26,807. Homecare SC Herceptin reduced the annual cost burden by 58.8% and 59.7%, per non-metastatic and metastatic breast cancer patient, respectively. The primary cost contributor was drug therapy, comprising more than 90% of the total cost. Even when excluding the cost of drugs, Homecare SC Herceptin remained cheaper by S$1912 annually. The cost reduction is approximately 60% compared to IV Herceptin regardless of disease status, with a 100% probability that the decision to adopt Homecare SC Herceptin leads to cost savings in Singapore.

Conclusion: Treatment of breast cancer with Homecare SC Herceptin is a cost-saving option compared to IV Herceptin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Perspective review: lessons from successful clinical trials and real-world studies of systemic therapy for metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Antibody-drug conjugates in patients with advanced/metastatic HER2-low-expressing breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma with exceptionally long response to lorlatinib-a case report. Changes in alpha-fetoprotein across the systemic therapy continuum in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma-a real-world, multicenter study. Comprehensive geriatric assessment guided radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer-exploratory results on nonoperative cohort of a multicenter prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1