深度学习在腿长不一致的 X 光片腿长测量中的诊断性能:系统综述。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70080
Bradley A. Lezak, James A. Pruneski, Jacob F. Oeding, Kyle N. Kunze, Riley J. Williams III, Michael J. Alaia, Andrew D. Pearle, Joshua S. Dines, Kristian Samuelsson, Ayoosh Pareek
{"title":"深度学习在腿长不一致的 X 光片腿长测量中的诊断性能:系统综述。","authors":"Bradley A. Lezak,&nbsp;James A. Pruneski,&nbsp;Jacob F. Oeding,&nbsp;Kyle N. Kunze,&nbsp;Riley J. Williams III,&nbsp;Michael J. Alaia,&nbsp;Andrew D. Pearle,&nbsp;Joshua S. Dines,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson,&nbsp;Ayoosh Pareek","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically review the literature regarding machine learning in leg length discrepancy (LLD) and to provide insight into the most relevant manuscripts on this topic in order to highlight the importance and future clinical implications of machine learning in the diagnosis and treatment of LLD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic electronic search was conducted using PubMed, OVID/Medline and Cochrane libraries in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Two observers independently screened the abstracts and titles of potential articles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of six studies were identified in the search. All measurements were calculated using standardized anterior-posterior long-leg radiographs. Five (83.3%) of the studies used measurements of the femoral length, tibial length and leg length to assess LLD, whereas one (16.6%) study used the iliac crest height difference to quantify LLD. The deep learning models showed excellent reliability in predicting all length measurements with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.98 to 1.0 and mean absolute error (MAE) values ranging from 0.11 to 0.45 cm. Three studies reported measurements of LLD, and the convolutional neural network model showed the lowest MAE of 0.13 cm in predicting LLD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Machine learning models are effective and efficient in determining LLD. Implementation of these models may reduce cost, improve efficiency and lead to better overall patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>This review highlights the potential of deep learning (DL) algorithms for accurate and reliable measurement of lower limb length and leg length discrepancy (LLD) on long-leg radiographs. The reported mean absolute error and intraclass correlation coefficient values indicate that the performance of the DL models was comparable to that of radiologists, suggesting that DL-based assessments could potentially be used to automate the measurement of lower limb length and LLD in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of deep learning for leg length measurements on radiographs in leg length discrepancy: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Bradley A. Lezak,&nbsp;James A. Pruneski,&nbsp;Jacob F. Oeding,&nbsp;Kyle N. Kunze,&nbsp;Riley J. Williams III,&nbsp;Michael J. Alaia,&nbsp;Andrew D. Pearle,&nbsp;Joshua S. Dines,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson,&nbsp;Ayoosh Pareek\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To systematically review the literature regarding machine learning in leg length discrepancy (LLD) and to provide insight into the most relevant manuscripts on this topic in order to highlight the importance and future clinical implications of machine learning in the diagnosis and treatment of LLD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic electronic search was conducted using PubMed, OVID/Medline and Cochrane libraries in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Two observers independently screened the abstracts and titles of potential articles.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of six studies were identified in the search. All measurements were calculated using standardized anterior-posterior long-leg radiographs. Five (83.3%) of the studies used measurements of the femoral length, tibial length and leg length to assess LLD, whereas one (16.6%) study used the iliac crest height difference to quantify LLD. The deep learning models showed excellent reliability in predicting all length measurements with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.98 to 1.0 and mean absolute error (MAE) values ranging from 0.11 to 0.45 cm. Three studies reported measurements of LLD, and the convolutional neural network model showed the lowest MAE of 0.13 cm in predicting LLD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Machine learning models are effective and efficient in determining LLD. Implementation of these models may reduce cost, improve efficiency and lead to better overall patient outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review highlights the potential of deep learning (DL) algorithms for accurate and reliable measurement of lower limb length and leg length discrepancy (LLD) on long-leg radiographs. The reported mean absolute error and intraclass correlation coefficient values indicate that the performance of the DL models was comparable to that of radiologists, suggesting that DL-based assessments could potentially be used to automate the measurement of lower limb length and LLD in clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level IV.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551063/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统综述有关机器学习在腿长不一致(LLD)方面的应用的文献,并深入分析与该主题最相关的手稿,以强调机器学习在诊断和治疗腿长不一致方面的重要性和未来的临床意义:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,使用 PubMed、OVID/Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统的电子检索。两名观察员独立筛选了潜在文章的摘要和标题:结果:检索共发现六项研究。所有测量值均采用标准化前后长腿X光片进行计算。其中五项研究(83.3%)使用股骨长度、胫骨长度和腿长的测量值来评估LLD,一项研究(16.6%)使用髂嵴高度差来量化LLD。深度学习模型在预测所有长度测量值方面表现出极佳的可靠性,类内相关系数在 0.98 到 1.0 之间,平均绝对误差 (MAE) 值在 0.11 到 0.45 厘米之间。三项研究报告了 LLD 的测量结果,其中卷积神经网络模型预测 LLD 的 MAE 最低,为 0.13 厘米:机器学习模型在确定 LLD 方面有效且高效。临床意义:本综述强调了深度学习(DL)算法在准确可靠地测量长腿X光片上的下肢长度和腿长差异(LLD)方面的潜力。报告的平均绝对误差和类内相关系数值表明,DL模型的性能与放射科医生的性能相当,这表明基于DL的评估有可能在临床实践中用于自动测量下肢长度和LLD:证据等级:IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic performance of deep learning for leg length measurements on radiographs in leg length discrepancy: A systematic review

Purpose

To systematically review the literature regarding machine learning in leg length discrepancy (LLD) and to provide insight into the most relevant manuscripts on this topic in order to highlight the importance and future clinical implications of machine learning in the diagnosis and treatment of LLD.

Methods

A systematic electronic search was conducted using PubMed, OVID/Medline and Cochrane libraries in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Two observers independently screened the abstracts and titles of potential articles.

Results

A total of six studies were identified in the search. All measurements were calculated using standardized anterior-posterior long-leg radiographs. Five (83.3%) of the studies used measurements of the femoral length, tibial length and leg length to assess LLD, whereas one (16.6%) study used the iliac crest height difference to quantify LLD. The deep learning models showed excellent reliability in predicting all length measurements with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.98 to 1.0 and mean absolute error (MAE) values ranging from 0.11 to 0.45 cm. Three studies reported measurements of LLD, and the convolutional neural network model showed the lowest MAE of 0.13 cm in predicting LLD.

Conclusions

Machine learning models are effective and efficient in determining LLD. Implementation of these models may reduce cost, improve efficiency and lead to better overall patient outcomes.

Clinical Relevance

This review highlights the potential of deep learning (DL) algorithms for accurate and reliable measurement of lower limb length and leg length discrepancy (LLD) on long-leg radiographs. The reported mean absolute error and intraclass correlation coefficient values indicate that the performance of the DL models was comparable to that of radiologists, suggesting that DL-based assessments could potentially be used to automate the measurement of lower limb length and LLD in clinical practice.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic acceptable zone of endobutton placement in ACL reconstruction: A prospective study Does free tendon length influence the injury risk of the Achilles tendon? A finite element study Daily physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A pilot study Preoperative tibiofemoral contact point on standing lateral radiograph predicts anteroposterior knee kinematics in total knee arthroplasty Assessment of trochanteric vascularity using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in a cadaveric model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1