在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者的腋窝注射脂肪源再生细胞与临床疗效无关。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Stem Cell Research & Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s13287-024-04037-z
Ditte Caroline Andersen, Frederik Adam Bjerre, Mads Gustaf Jørgensen, Jens Ahm Sørensen, Charlotte Harken Jensen
{"title":"在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者的腋窝注射脂肪源再生细胞与临床疗效无关。","authors":"Ditte Caroline Andersen, Frederik Adam Bjerre, Mads Gustaf Jørgensen, Jens Ahm Sørensen, Charlotte Harken Jensen","doi":"10.1186/s13287-024-04037-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injection of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) combined with lipotransfer has been suggested to alleviate symptoms in diseases including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). We recently performed a randomized controlled trial injecting lipoaspirate with ADRCs into the axilla of BCRL patients, and here we aimed in the intervention group to define in an unbiased fashion whether ADRC injection was linked to the clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>39 BCRL patients received lipotransfer assisted with autologous ADRCs (4.20 × 10<sup>7</sup> ± 1.75 × 10<sup>7</sup> cells) whereas 41 BCRL patients were included for placebo treatment. At 12 month follow-up, we assessed quality of life, lymphangiography, and bioimpedance enclosing 59 outcome parameters. Multifactorial analysis of clinical outcomes was used to define responders and non-responders to the intervention, and collected ADRCs from these patient groups were analyzed by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unbiased multifactorial analysis ranked and defined the clinical outcomes (Sf36 physical change, L-Dex Lymph Change, ICG mdanderson change) with the highest effect on BCRL patients. The 10 patients with the highest- and lowest effect (five responders and five non-responders) were included in the study. No difference between non-responders and responders were observed for injected ADRC number/size/viability (p > 0.05). In scRNAseq, we did not find any major difference (p > 0.05) between groups in ADRC composition regarding adipose derived stem cells, endothelial-, smooth muscle-, T-, B-, mast cells as well as macrophages, which was verified by flow cytometry. Differential subcluster gene expression between groups were for 92.5% of genes, including those encoding secretory proteins, below the threshold of 1.5, and thus neglible. Together this suggested that the ADRC phenotype was indistinguishable between BCRL responders and non-responders to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that the ADRC injection and ADRC phenotype or heterogeneity have no effect on the clinical outcomes on BCRL, and ADRC assisted lipotranfer for BCRL should therefore not be considered currently.</p>","PeriodicalId":21876,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Research & Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"426"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcome is unlinked to injection of adipose-derived regenerative cells in the axilla of breast cancer-related lymphedema patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ditte Caroline Andersen, Frederik Adam Bjerre, Mads Gustaf Jørgensen, Jens Ahm Sørensen, Charlotte Harken Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13287-024-04037-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injection of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) combined with lipotransfer has been suggested to alleviate symptoms in diseases including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). We recently performed a randomized controlled trial injecting lipoaspirate with ADRCs into the axilla of BCRL patients, and here we aimed in the intervention group to define in an unbiased fashion whether ADRC injection was linked to the clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>39 BCRL patients received lipotransfer assisted with autologous ADRCs (4.20 × 10<sup>7</sup> ± 1.75 × 10<sup>7</sup> cells) whereas 41 BCRL patients were included for placebo treatment. At 12 month follow-up, we assessed quality of life, lymphangiography, and bioimpedance enclosing 59 outcome parameters. Multifactorial analysis of clinical outcomes was used to define responders and non-responders to the intervention, and collected ADRCs from these patient groups were analyzed by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unbiased multifactorial analysis ranked and defined the clinical outcomes (Sf36 physical change, L-Dex Lymph Change, ICG mdanderson change) with the highest effect on BCRL patients. The 10 patients with the highest- and lowest effect (five responders and five non-responders) were included in the study. No difference between non-responders and responders were observed for injected ADRC number/size/viability (p > 0.05). In scRNAseq, we did not find any major difference (p > 0.05) between groups in ADRC composition regarding adipose derived stem cells, endothelial-, smooth muscle-, T-, B-, mast cells as well as macrophages, which was verified by flow cytometry. Differential subcluster gene expression between groups were for 92.5% of genes, including those encoding secretory proteins, below the threshold of 1.5, and thus neglible. Together this suggested that the ADRC phenotype was indistinguishable between BCRL responders and non-responders to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that the ADRC injection and ADRC phenotype or heterogeneity have no effect on the clinical outcomes on BCRL, and ADRC assisted lipotranfer for BCRL should therefore not be considered currently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stem Cell Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stem Cell Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-04037-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-04037-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:注射自体脂肪源性再生细胞(ADRCs)结合脂肪移植被认为可以减轻包括乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)在内的疾病症状。我们最近进行了一项随机对照试验,在 BCRL 患者的腋下注射含有 ADRCs 的脂肪抽吸液,在此,我们的目标是在干预组中以无偏见的方式确定 ADRC 注射是否与临床结果有关。方法:39 名 BCRL 患者接受了自体 ADRCs(4.20 × 107 ± 1.75 × 107 个细胞)辅助的脂肪移植,41 名 BCRL 患者接受了安慰剂治疗。在 12 个月的随访中,我们评估了生活质量、淋巴管造影和生物阻抗等 59 项结果参数。临床结果的多因素分析用于界定干预的应答者和非应答者,并通过单细胞RNA测序(scRNAseq)对这些患者组收集的ADRCs进行分析:结果:无偏多因素分析对BCRL患者影响最大的临床结果(Sf36物理变化、L-Dex淋巴变化、ICG mdanderson变化)进行了排序和定义。效果最高和效果最低的 10 名患者(5 名应答者和 5 名无应答者)被纳入研究。在注射的 ADRC 数量/大小/活力方面,未反应者和反应者之间未观察到差异(P > 0.05)。在 scRNAseq 中,我们没有发现各组 ADRC 在脂肪衍生干细胞、内皮细胞、平滑肌细胞、T 细胞、B 细胞、肥大细胞和巨噬细胞的组成上有任何重大差异(p > 0.05),这一点已通过流式细胞术得到验证。92.5%的基因(包括编码分泌蛋白的基因)在组间的亚群基因表达差异低于1.5阈值,因此可以忽略不计。综合来看,ADRC表型在BCRL干预反应者和非反应者之间没有区别:我们的数据表明,ADRC注射和ADRC表型或异质性对BCRL的临床结果没有影响,因此目前不应考虑用ADRC辅助脂联素治疗BCRL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcome is unlinked to injection of adipose-derived regenerative cells in the axilla of breast cancer-related lymphedema patients.

Background: Injection of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) combined with lipotransfer has been suggested to alleviate symptoms in diseases including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). We recently performed a randomized controlled trial injecting lipoaspirate with ADRCs into the axilla of BCRL patients, and here we aimed in the intervention group to define in an unbiased fashion whether ADRC injection was linked to the clinical outcome.

Methods: 39 BCRL patients received lipotransfer assisted with autologous ADRCs (4.20 × 107 ± 1.75 × 107 cells) whereas 41 BCRL patients were included for placebo treatment. At 12 month follow-up, we assessed quality of life, lymphangiography, and bioimpedance enclosing 59 outcome parameters. Multifactorial analysis of clinical outcomes was used to define responders and non-responders to the intervention, and collected ADRCs from these patient groups were analyzed by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq).

Results: Unbiased multifactorial analysis ranked and defined the clinical outcomes (Sf36 physical change, L-Dex Lymph Change, ICG mdanderson change) with the highest effect on BCRL patients. The 10 patients with the highest- and lowest effect (five responders and five non-responders) were included in the study. No difference between non-responders and responders were observed for injected ADRC number/size/viability (p > 0.05). In scRNAseq, we did not find any major difference (p > 0.05) between groups in ADRC composition regarding adipose derived stem cells, endothelial-, smooth muscle-, T-, B-, mast cells as well as macrophages, which was verified by flow cytometry. Differential subcluster gene expression between groups were for 92.5% of genes, including those encoding secretory proteins, below the threshold of 1.5, and thus neglible. Together this suggested that the ADRC phenotype was indistinguishable between BCRL responders and non-responders to the intervention.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that the ADRC injection and ADRC phenotype or heterogeneity have no effect on the clinical outcomes on BCRL, and ADRC assisted lipotranfer for BCRL should therefore not be considered currently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Stem Cell Research & Therapy CELL BIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Stem Cell Research & Therapy serves as a leading platform for translational research in stem cell therapies. This international, peer-reviewed journal publishes high-quality open-access research articles, with a focus on basic, translational, and clinical research in stem cell therapeutics and regenerative therapies. Coverage includes animal models and clinical trials. Additionally, the journal offers reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, and reports.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Multi-omics evaluation of clinical-grade human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in synergistic improvement of aging related disorders in a senescence-accelerated mouse model. Different storage and freezing protocols for extracellular vesicles: a systematic review. Inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase reverses bone loss in periodontitis by upregulating EMCN and inhibiting osteoclasts. Intravenous injection of BMSCs modulate tsRNA expression and ameliorate lung remodeling in COPD mice. Exosome crosstalk between cancer stem cells and tumor microenvironment: cancer progression and therapeutic strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1