新辅助治疗对伴有下腔静脉血栓的肾细胞癌预后的影响

Takuto Hara, Kotaro Suzuki, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Hideto Ueki, Yukari Bando, Keisuke Okada, Tomoaki Terakawa, Yoji Hyodo, Koji Chiba, Jun Teishima, Hideaki Miyake
{"title":"新辅助治疗对伴有下腔静脉血栓的肾细胞癌预后的影响","authors":"Takuto Hara, Kotaro Suzuki, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Hideto Ueki, Yukari Bando, Keisuke Okada, Tomoaki Terakawa, Yoji Hyodo, Koji Chiba, Jun Teishima, Hideaki Miyake","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard treatment for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is complete surgical resection; however, this procedure is complex and carries high complication rates and perioperative mortality. Previous studies have explored preoperative multimodal therapy to reduce surgical difficulty, but limited evidence prevents guideline recommendations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the prognosis of patients with RCC and IVC thrombus without distant metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 2006 to 2024 on RCC patients with IVC thrombus undergoing radical nephrectomy plus IVC thrombus resection were collected. Patients received neoadjuvant therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors, followed by surgery. Tumor size and thrombus height were assessed by computed tomography. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors predicting DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC-Naive group) and 19 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC group) were analyzed. The NAC group showed significant reductions in primary renal tumor size and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio compared to the NAC-Naive group just before nephrectomy. The NAC group had significantly improved DFS and OS. Median DFS and OS were not reached in the NAC group compared to 26.3 months and 73.5 months, respectively, in the NAC-Naive group. The NAC group had a 2-year recurrence-free survival rate of 70.9% compared to 50.6% in the NAC-Naive group. Multivariate analysis identified a preoperative tumor size of 10 cm or larger and lack of neoadjuvant therapy as poor prognostic factors for DFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy significantly improves the prognosis of RCC patients with IVC thrombus. This therapy reduces surgical invasiveness and has a mid- to long-term preventive effect on recurrence. These findings support the potential benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in improving outcomes for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on prognosis in renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus.\",\"authors\":\"Takuto Hara, Kotaro Suzuki, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Hideto Ueki, Yukari Bando, Keisuke Okada, Tomoaki Terakawa, Yoji Hyodo, Koji Chiba, Jun Teishima, Hideaki Miyake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard treatment for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is complete surgical resection; however, this procedure is complex and carries high complication rates and perioperative mortality. Previous studies have explored preoperative multimodal therapy to reduce surgical difficulty, but limited evidence prevents guideline recommendations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the prognosis of patients with RCC and IVC thrombus without distant metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 2006 to 2024 on RCC patients with IVC thrombus undergoing radical nephrectomy plus IVC thrombus resection were collected. Patients received neoadjuvant therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors, followed by surgery. Tumor size and thrombus height were assessed by computed tomography. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors predicting DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC-Naive group) and 19 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC group) were analyzed. The NAC group showed significant reductions in primary renal tumor size and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio compared to the NAC-Naive group just before nephrectomy. The NAC group had significantly improved DFS and OS. Median DFS and OS were not reached in the NAC group compared to 26.3 months and 73.5 months, respectively, in the NAC-Naive group. The NAC group had a 2-year recurrence-free survival rate of 70.9% compared to 50.6% in the NAC-Naive group. Multivariate analysis identified a preoperative tumor size of 10 cm or larger and lack of neoadjuvant therapy as poor prognostic factors for DFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy significantly improves the prognosis of RCC patients with IVC thrombus. This therapy reduces surgical invasiveness and has a mid- to long-term preventive effect on recurrence. These findings support the potential benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in improving outcomes for this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于伴有下腔静脉(IVC)血栓的非转移性肾细胞癌(RCC),标准治疗方法是完全手术切除;然而,这种手术很复杂,并发症发生率和围手术期死亡率都很高。以往的研究探讨了术前多模式疗法以降低手术难度,但有限的证据阻碍了指南的推荐。本研究旨在探讨新辅助治疗对无远处转移的RCC合并IVC血栓患者预后的影响:收集了2006年至2024年接受根治性肾切除术加IVC血栓切除术的RCC合并IVC血栓患者的数据。患者接受新辅助治疗,包括酪氨酸激酶抑制剂或免疫检查点抑制剂,然后进行手术。通过计算机断层扫描评估肿瘤大小和血栓高度。采用卡普兰-梅耶曲线计算无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。多变量分析用于确定预测无病生存期的因素:分析了31例未接受新辅助化疗的患者(NAC-Naive组)和19例接受新辅助化疗的患者(NAC组)。与肾切除术前的NAC-Naive组相比,NAC组的原发性肾肿瘤大小和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值明显缩小。NAC 组的 DFS 和 OS 明显改善。NAC 组的中位 DFS 和 OS 均未达标,而 NAC-Naive 组分别为 26.3 个月和 73.5 个月。NAC 组的 2 年无复发生存率为 70.9%,而 NAC-Naive 组为 50.6%。多变量分析发现,术前肿瘤大小为10厘米或更大以及缺乏新辅助治疗是DFS的不良预后因素:结论:新辅助治疗可明显改善有IVC血栓的RCC患者的预后。结论:新辅助治疗可明显改善有 IVC 血栓的 RCC 患者的预后,降低手术侵袭性,并对复发有中长期预防作用。这些研究结果支持了新辅助系统疗法在改善这类患者预后方面的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on prognosis in renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus.

Background: The standard treatment for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is complete surgical resection; however, this procedure is complex and carries high complication rates and perioperative mortality. Previous studies have explored preoperative multimodal therapy to reduce surgical difficulty, but limited evidence prevents guideline recommendations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the prognosis of patients with RCC and IVC thrombus without distant metastasis.

Methods: Data from 2006 to 2024 on RCC patients with IVC thrombus undergoing radical nephrectomy plus IVC thrombus resection were collected. Patients received neoadjuvant therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors, followed by surgery. Tumor size and thrombus height were assessed by computed tomography. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors predicting DFS.

Results: Thirty-one patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC-Naive group) and 19 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC group) were analyzed. The NAC group showed significant reductions in primary renal tumor size and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio compared to the NAC-Naive group just before nephrectomy. The NAC group had significantly improved DFS and OS. Median DFS and OS were not reached in the NAC group compared to 26.3 months and 73.5 months, respectively, in the NAC-Naive group. The NAC group had a 2-year recurrence-free survival rate of 70.9% compared to 50.6% in the NAC-Naive group. Multivariate analysis identified a preoperative tumor size of 10 cm or larger and lack of neoadjuvant therapy as poor prognostic factors for DFS.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant therapy significantly improves the prognosis of RCC patients with IVC thrombus. This therapy reduces surgical invasiveness and has a mid- to long-term preventive effect on recurrence. These findings support the potential benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in improving outcomes for this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Cover 2 - Masthead 2023 Star Reviewers for Urologic Oncology Cover 3 - Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1