Bacem Khalele Othman, Martina Bradová, Roderick H W Simpson, Jan Laco, Abbas Agaimy, Miguel Rito, Stephan Ihrler, Petr Steiner, Petr Grossmann, Veronika Hájková, Gisele de Rezende, Montse Goma, Senada Koljenovic, Isabel Fonseca, Michal Michal, Ilmo Leivo, Alena Skalova
{"title":"涎腺硬化性粘液表皮样癌。","authors":"Bacem Khalele Othman, Martina Bradová, Roderick H W Simpson, Jan Laco, Abbas Agaimy, Miguel Rito, Stephan Ihrler, Petr Steiner, Petr Grossmann, Veronika Hájková, Gisele de Rezende, Montse Goma, Senada Koljenovic, Isabel Fonseca, Michal Michal, Ilmo Leivo, Alena Skalova","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03970-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma (SMEC) of the salivary glands is a rare variant of low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma with scanty cellular atypia characterized by marked fibrosis/sclerosis and a rich inflammatory infiltrate. Herein, we report 25 unpublished cases of SMEC, two of them with prominent eosinophilia (2/25; 8%) and three with abundant IgG4-positive plasma cells (3/25; 12%). In our series of salivary SMEC, molecular analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) provided evidence of MAML2 gene rearrangement in 18 cases of the 21 analyzable cases tested (86%), while this gene locus was intact in 3 cases (14%). This study focuses on the diagnostic criteria of salivary SMEC given its challenge of abundant collagenous stroma, minimal residual neoplastic areas, and inconspicuous mucous cells. Follow-up data of our cases indicate that salivary SMECs have favorable outcomes. Molecular analysis for MAML2 gene rearrangement suggests that SMECs of salivary glands represent a rare variant of conventional low-grade MECs of salivary glands. In contrast, SMECs of the thyroid gland are genetically distinct from salivary-type thyroid MECs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands.\",\"authors\":\"Bacem Khalele Othman, Martina Bradová, Roderick H W Simpson, Jan Laco, Abbas Agaimy, Miguel Rito, Stephan Ihrler, Petr Steiner, Petr Grossmann, Veronika Hájková, Gisele de Rezende, Montse Goma, Senada Koljenovic, Isabel Fonseca, Michal Michal, Ilmo Leivo, Alena Skalova\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03970-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma (SMEC) of the salivary glands is a rare variant of low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma with scanty cellular atypia characterized by marked fibrosis/sclerosis and a rich inflammatory infiltrate. Herein, we report 25 unpublished cases of SMEC, two of them with prominent eosinophilia (2/25; 8%) and three with abundant IgG4-positive plasma cells (3/25; 12%). In our series of salivary SMEC, molecular analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) provided evidence of MAML2 gene rearrangement in 18 cases of the 21 analyzable cases tested (86%), while this gene locus was intact in 3 cases (14%). This study focuses on the diagnostic criteria of salivary SMEC given its challenge of abundant collagenous stroma, minimal residual neoplastic areas, and inconspicuous mucous cells. Follow-up data of our cases indicate that salivary SMECs have favorable outcomes. Molecular analysis for MAML2 gene rearrangement suggests that SMECs of salivary glands represent a rare variant of conventional low-grade MECs of salivary glands. In contrast, SMECs of the thyroid gland are genetically distinct from salivary-type thyroid MECs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03970-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03970-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands.
Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma (SMEC) of the salivary glands is a rare variant of low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma with scanty cellular atypia characterized by marked fibrosis/sclerosis and a rich inflammatory infiltrate. Herein, we report 25 unpublished cases of SMEC, two of them with prominent eosinophilia (2/25; 8%) and three with abundant IgG4-positive plasma cells (3/25; 12%). In our series of salivary SMEC, molecular analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) provided evidence of MAML2 gene rearrangement in 18 cases of the 21 analyzable cases tested (86%), while this gene locus was intact in 3 cases (14%). This study focuses on the diagnostic criteria of salivary SMEC given its challenge of abundant collagenous stroma, minimal residual neoplastic areas, and inconspicuous mucous cells. Follow-up data of our cases indicate that salivary SMECs have favorable outcomes. Molecular analysis for MAML2 gene rearrangement suggests that SMECs of salivary glands represent a rare variant of conventional low-grade MECs of salivary glands. In contrast, SMECs of the thyroid gland are genetically distinct from salivary-type thyroid MECs.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.