Reynaldo G Gómez, Laura G Velarde, Rodrigo A Campos, Víctor Barrientos
{"title":"后尿道保全血管无交叉吻合重建术:单中心长期随访经验。","authors":"Reynaldo G Gómez, Laura G Velarde, Rodrigo A Campos, Víctor Barrientos","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To discuss the long-term results of our vessel-sparing non-transecting approach (vspEPA) to perform anastomotic urethroplasty at the posterior urethra. We avoid transecting the bulbar arteries to preserve the antegrade vascularization of the urethra. We hypothesize that vspEPA is feasible, safe and not inferior to the traditional transecting technique. Additionally, it may provide benefits if an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation be required in the future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The bulbar urethra was elevated from the corpus cavernosum, released distally, retracted laterally, and approached dorsally at the bulbo-membranous junction. This exposure allows removal of the scar and perform the anastomotic reconstruction as in the standard transecting technique, while avoiding division of the bulbar arteries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>127 patients, median age 58 years (IQR 35-67), were reconstructed since 2008. Etiology of the stenosis was BPH surgery (n=48), pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) (n=61), prostate cancer treatment (n=14) and instrumentation (n=4). With a median follow-up of 43 months (IQR 17-74) stenosis repair success was observed in 121 patients (95%). High grade complications (Clavien ≥III) occurred in 6 (5%) of cases and overall stress incontinence was observed in 24 (19%) of patients. 14 patients subsequently received an AUS and notably none of them suffered cuff erosion after a median follow up of 36 months, CONCLUSION: Sparing of the bulbar arteries during anastomotic reconstruction of the posterior urethra is feasible and safe. Although slightly more elaborated, it will not compromise the surgical results and may be instrumental to avoid AUS cuff-related erosion in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vessel-sparing non-transecting anastomotic reconstruction of the posterior urethra: Single center experience with long-term follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Reynaldo G Gómez, Laura G Velarde, Rodrigo A Campos, Víctor Barrientos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To discuss the long-term results of our vessel-sparing non-transecting approach (vspEPA) to perform anastomotic urethroplasty at the posterior urethra. We avoid transecting the bulbar arteries to preserve the antegrade vascularization of the urethra. We hypothesize that vspEPA is feasible, safe and not inferior to the traditional transecting technique. Additionally, it may provide benefits if an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation be required in the future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The bulbar urethra was elevated from the corpus cavernosum, released distally, retracted laterally, and approached dorsally at the bulbo-membranous junction. This exposure allows removal of the scar and perform the anastomotic reconstruction as in the standard transecting technique, while avoiding division of the bulbar arteries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>127 patients, median age 58 years (IQR 35-67), were reconstructed since 2008. Etiology of the stenosis was BPH surgery (n=48), pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) (n=61), prostate cancer treatment (n=14) and instrumentation (n=4). With a median follow-up of 43 months (IQR 17-74) stenosis repair success was observed in 121 patients (95%). High grade complications (Clavien ≥III) occurred in 6 (5%) of cases and overall stress incontinence was observed in 24 (19%) of patients. 14 patients subsequently received an AUS and notably none of them suffered cuff erosion after a median follow up of 36 months, CONCLUSION: Sparing of the bulbar arteries during anastomotic reconstruction of the posterior urethra is feasible and safe. Although slightly more elaborated, it will not compromise the surgical results and may be instrumental to avoid AUS cuff-related erosion in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vessel-sparing non-transecting anastomotic reconstruction of the posterior urethra: Single center experience with long-term follow-up.
Objective: To discuss the long-term results of our vessel-sparing non-transecting approach (vspEPA) to perform anastomotic urethroplasty at the posterior urethra. We avoid transecting the bulbar arteries to preserve the antegrade vascularization of the urethra. We hypothesize that vspEPA is feasible, safe and not inferior to the traditional transecting technique. Additionally, it may provide benefits if an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation be required in the future.
Methods: The bulbar urethra was elevated from the corpus cavernosum, released distally, retracted laterally, and approached dorsally at the bulbo-membranous junction. This exposure allows removal of the scar and perform the anastomotic reconstruction as in the standard transecting technique, while avoiding division of the bulbar arteries.
Results: 127 patients, median age 58 years (IQR 35-67), were reconstructed since 2008. Etiology of the stenosis was BPH surgery (n=48), pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) (n=61), prostate cancer treatment (n=14) and instrumentation (n=4). With a median follow-up of 43 months (IQR 17-74) stenosis repair success was observed in 121 patients (95%). High grade complications (Clavien ≥III) occurred in 6 (5%) of cases and overall stress incontinence was observed in 24 (19%) of patients. 14 patients subsequently received an AUS and notably none of them suffered cuff erosion after a median follow up of 36 months, CONCLUSION: Sparing of the bulbar arteries during anastomotic reconstruction of the posterior urethra is feasible and safe. Although slightly more elaborated, it will not compromise the surgical results and may be instrumental to avoid AUS cuff-related erosion in the future.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.