男性因素不育与城乡差别。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.080
Devon M Langston, Kiarad Fendereski, Joshua Halpern, Ijeoma N Iko, Kenneth Aston, Benjamin R Emery, Elisabeth Ferlic, Joemy M Ramsay, Joshua J Horns, James Hotaling
{"title":"男性因素不育与城乡差别。","authors":"Devon M Langston, Kiarad Fendereski, Joshua Halpern, Ijeoma N Iko, Kenneth Aston, Benjamin R Emery, Elisabeth Ferlic, Joemy M Ramsay, Joshua J Horns, James Hotaling","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between male factor infertility and the Rural-Urban continuum.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single institution retrospective cohort study using the Utah Population Database (UPDB), which combines demographic, medical, and residential data for patients residing in Utah and links to the Subfertility Health Assisted Reproduction and Environment (SHARE) database, which houses fertility data from 1998-2017. The data was divided by metropolitan (metro-) [large, medium, small], and non-metropolitan (non-metro-) [urban, rural] status, based on United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) rural-urban continuum codes (RUCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-metro urban/rural males were less likely to be a racial/ethnic minority (91.3% non-Hispanic white vs 85.7%), or use assisted reproductive technology (ART) (13.4% vs 18.5%). Multivariate regression controlling for race/ethnicity, age, semen analysis category (oligozoospermic vs normozoospermic), previous successful fertility outcome, and use of ART, demonstrated complete rurality was associated with decreased likelihood of successful fertility outcome (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.91, n=65). Non-metro urban individuals trended towards lower likelihood of successful fertility outcome ([HR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.01). Complete rurality was associated with longer time for 50% cohort successful fertility outcome (>60 months vs approximately 34 months both metro). All comparisons p<0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across the rural-urban continuum, residing in a metro area was associated with higher rates of racial/ethnically diversity, fertility treatment utilization, and successful fertility outcomes (live births). Given approximately 18% of the United States resides with a rural community (12% in Utah), these findings can provide more informed infertility care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Male Factor Infertility and the Rural-Urban Continuum.\",\"authors\":\"Devon M Langston, Kiarad Fendereski, Joshua Halpern, Ijeoma N Iko, Kenneth Aston, Benjamin R Emery, Elisabeth Ferlic, Joemy M Ramsay, Joshua J Horns, James Hotaling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between male factor infertility and the Rural-Urban continuum.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single institution retrospective cohort study using the Utah Population Database (UPDB), which combines demographic, medical, and residential data for patients residing in Utah and links to the Subfertility Health Assisted Reproduction and Environment (SHARE) database, which houses fertility data from 1998-2017. The data was divided by metropolitan (metro-) [large, medium, small], and non-metropolitan (non-metro-) [urban, rural] status, based on United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) rural-urban continuum codes (RUCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-metro urban/rural males were less likely to be a racial/ethnic minority (91.3% non-Hispanic white vs 85.7%), or use assisted reproductive technology (ART) (13.4% vs 18.5%). Multivariate regression controlling for race/ethnicity, age, semen analysis category (oligozoospermic vs normozoospermic), previous successful fertility outcome, and use of ART, demonstrated complete rurality was associated with decreased likelihood of successful fertility outcome (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.91, n=65). Non-metro urban individuals trended towards lower likelihood of successful fertility outcome ([HR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.01). Complete rurality was associated with longer time for 50% cohort successful fertility outcome (>60 months vs approximately 34 months both metro). All comparisons p<0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across the rural-urban continuum, residing in a metro area was associated with higher rates of racial/ethnically diversity, fertility treatment utilization, and successful fertility outcomes (live births). Given approximately 18% of the United States resides with a rural community (12% in Utah), these findings can provide more informed infertility care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究男性因素不育与城乡连续性之间的关系:研究男性因素不育与城乡连续性之间的关系:使用犹他州人口数据库(UPDB)进行单机构回顾性队列研究,该数据库结合了居住在犹他州的患者的人口、医疗和居住数据,并与亚不孕症健康辅助生殖和环境(SHARE)数据库链接,后者包含 1998-2017 年的生育数据。根据美国农业部(USDA)的城乡连续编码(RUCC),数据按大都市(metro-)[大、中、小]和非大都市(non-metro-)[城市、农村]状态进行划分:结果:非大都市/农村男性成为少数种族/人种(91.3% 非西班牙裔白人 vs 85.7%)或使用辅助生殖技术(ART)(13.4% vs 18.5%)的可能性较低。多变量回归控制了种族/族裔、年龄、精液分析类别(少精子症与正常精子症)、既往成功生育结果和使用 ART,结果表明完全居住在农村与成功生育结果的可能性降低有关(危险比 [HR] 0.63,95% CI 0.44-0.91,n=65)。非大都市人口的成功生育率呈下降趋势([HR] 0.93,95% CI 0.85-1.01)。完全居住在农村与 50%队列成功生育的时间较长有关(大于 60 个月 vs 约 34 个月,均为地铁)。所有比较均得出结论:在城乡之间,居住在都会区与较高的种族/民族多样性、生育治疗利用率和成功生育率(活产)有关。鉴于美国约有 18% 的人口居住在农村社区(犹他州为 12%),这些研究结果可以为不孕不育患者提供更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Male Factor Infertility and the Rural-Urban Continuum.

Objective: To examine the association between male factor infertility and the Rural-Urban continuum.

Materials and methods: Single institution retrospective cohort study using the Utah Population Database (UPDB), which combines demographic, medical, and residential data for patients residing in Utah and links to the Subfertility Health Assisted Reproduction and Environment (SHARE) database, which houses fertility data from 1998-2017. The data was divided by metropolitan (metro-) [large, medium, small], and non-metropolitan (non-metro-) [urban, rural] status, based on United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) rural-urban continuum codes (RUCC).

Results: Non-metro urban/rural males were less likely to be a racial/ethnic minority (91.3% non-Hispanic white vs 85.7%), or use assisted reproductive technology (ART) (13.4% vs 18.5%). Multivariate regression controlling for race/ethnicity, age, semen analysis category (oligozoospermic vs normozoospermic), previous successful fertility outcome, and use of ART, demonstrated complete rurality was associated with decreased likelihood of successful fertility outcome (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.91, n=65). Non-metro urban individuals trended towards lower likelihood of successful fertility outcome ([HR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.01). Complete rurality was associated with longer time for 50% cohort successful fertility outcome (>60 months vs approximately 34 months both metro). All comparisons p<0.001.

Conclusions: Across the rural-urban continuum, residing in a metro area was associated with higher rates of racial/ethnically diversity, fertility treatment utilization, and successful fertility outcomes (live births). Given approximately 18% of the United States resides with a rural community (12% in Utah), these findings can provide more informed infertility care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
期刊最新文献
Drug-induced uropathy. Editorial Comment on "PSMA PET-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Initial Experience from a Multicenter Cohort". Commercial prices and care for Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer. Editorial Comment on "Is There a Consensus on the Management of Primary Obstructive Megaureter?" Penile Enhancement Surgery - The Short and the Long of It.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1