[2022年ESC/ERS修订的血液动力学定义对肺动脉高压诊断的影响]。

W M Zhang, W Guo, M Zhang, H Li, Y Wang, Y Chen, S C Duan, J Li, C R An, Y Xiao, J Wan
{"title":"[2022年ESC/ERS修订的血液动力学定义对肺动脉高压诊断的影响]。","authors":"W M Zhang, W Guo, M Zhang, H Li, Y Wang, Y Chen, S C Duan, J Li, C R An, Y Xiao, J Wan","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240603-01254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> In the 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines, the hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was revised to mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)>20 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) at rest. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of PH. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with dyspnea or highly suspected PH who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) in Beijing Anzhen hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from September 2021 to October 2022 were enrolled retrospectively. According to resting hemodynamics, the patients were divided into 3 groups: no-PH (mPAP≤20 mmHg) group, low-pressure PH (20 mmHg<mPAP<25 mmHg) group and high-pressure PH (mPAP≥25 mmHg) group. The diagnosis and classification of PH and the hemodynamic parameters in different groups were compared before and after the revision of diagnostic criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of maximum of mPAP (mPAP<sub>max</sub>) and mPAP/cardiac output (CO) slope of multi-point in PH. <b>Results:</b> A total of 117 patients were included for analysis, the age was (53.7±17.5) years, 37 (31.6%) patients were male. According to the 2022 ESC/ERS definition, 99 patients were diagnosed as PH, including 8 patients (6.8%) in the low-pressure PH group and 91 patients (77.8%) in the high-pressure PH group. There were 18 patients (15.4%) in the non-PH group. Comparing to the 2015 ESC/ERS definition, 8 patients were newly diagnosed as PH. Echocardiography indexes pulmonary systolic pressure (sPAP) [(57.6±7.3) vs (38.5±13.6) mmHg], max tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV<sub>max</sub>) [(360.4±28.9) vs (271.4±52.2) cm/s] and RHC index mPAP [(22.2±1.3) vs (16.1±2.6) mmHg] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group (all <i>P</i><0.05). However, further analysis of hemodynamics during exercise showed mPAP<sub>max</sub> [(42.1±5.6) vs (35.6±4.7) mmHg, <i>P</i>=0.006] and mPAP/CO slope of multi-point [(4.9±1.3) vs (3.6±1.1) mmHg·L<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>,<i>P</i>=0.024] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group. The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAP<sub>max</sub> for the diagnosis of PH was 39 mmHg, with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and the area under the curve (AUC) and 95%<i>CI</i> is 0.816 (0.638-0.994). The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAP/CO slope of multi-point for the diagnosis of PH was 4.44 mmHg·L<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>,with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and an AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) of 0.794 (0.606-0.983). <b>Conclusion:</b> After the revision of the hemodynamic definition of PH in the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, more PH patients with pulmonary vascular disease are detected, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"104 42","pages":"3903-3909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Impact of the 2022 ESC/ERS revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension].\",\"authors\":\"W M Zhang, W Guo, M Zhang, H Li, Y Wang, Y Chen, S C Duan, J Li, C R An, Y Xiao, J Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240603-01254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> In the 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines, the hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was revised to mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)>20 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) at rest. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of PH. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with dyspnea or highly suspected PH who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) in Beijing Anzhen hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from September 2021 to October 2022 were enrolled retrospectively. According to resting hemodynamics, the patients were divided into 3 groups: no-PH (mPAP≤20 mmHg) group, low-pressure PH (20 mmHg<mPAP<25 mmHg) group and high-pressure PH (mPAP≥25 mmHg) group. The diagnosis and classification of PH and the hemodynamic parameters in different groups were compared before and after the revision of diagnostic criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of maximum of mPAP (mPAP<sub>max</sub>) and mPAP/cardiac output (CO) slope of multi-point in PH. <b>Results:</b> A total of 117 patients were included for analysis, the age was (53.7±17.5) years, 37 (31.6%) patients were male. According to the 2022 ESC/ERS definition, 99 patients were diagnosed as PH, including 8 patients (6.8%) in the low-pressure PH group and 91 patients (77.8%) in the high-pressure PH group. There were 18 patients (15.4%) in the non-PH group. Comparing to the 2015 ESC/ERS definition, 8 patients were newly diagnosed as PH. Echocardiography indexes pulmonary systolic pressure (sPAP) [(57.6±7.3) vs (38.5±13.6) mmHg], max tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV<sub>max</sub>) [(360.4±28.9) vs (271.4±52.2) cm/s] and RHC index mPAP [(22.2±1.3) vs (16.1±2.6) mmHg] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group (all <i>P</i><0.05). However, further analysis of hemodynamics during exercise showed mPAP<sub>max</sub> [(42.1±5.6) vs (35.6±4.7) mmHg, <i>P</i>=0.006] and mPAP/CO slope of multi-point [(4.9±1.3) vs (3.6±1.1) mmHg·L<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>,<i>P</i>=0.024] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group. The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAP<sub>max</sub> for the diagnosis of PH was 39 mmHg, with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and the area under the curve (AUC) and 95%<i>CI</i> is 0.816 (0.638-0.994). The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAP/CO slope of multi-point for the diagnosis of PH was 4.44 mmHg·L<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>,with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and an AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) of 0.794 (0.606-0.983). <b>Conclusion:</b> After the revision of the hemodynamic definition of PH in the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, more PH patients with pulmonary vascular disease are detected, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"volume\":\"104 42\",\"pages\":\"3903-3909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240603-01254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240603-01254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在 2022 年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会(ESC/ERS)指南中,肺动脉高压(PH)的血液动力学定义修订为静息时平均肺动脉压(mPAP)>20 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)。本研究旨在评估修订后的血液动力学定义对 PH 诊断的影响。方法:回顾性纳入2021年9月至2022年10月期间在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院接受右心导管检查(RHC)的呼吸困难或高度疑似PH患者。根据静息血流动力学,将患者分为三组:无 PH(mPAP≤20 mmHg)组、低压 PH(20 mmHgmax)组和多点 PH 的 mPAP/心输出量(CO)斜率组。结果:共纳入 117 例患者进行分析,年龄为(53.7±17.5)岁,男性患者 37 例(31.6%)。根据 2022 年 ESC/ERS 定义,99 例患者被诊断为 PH,其中低压 PH 组 8 例(6.8%),高压 PH 组 91 例(77.8%)。非 PH 组有 18 名患者(15.4%)。与2015年ESC/ERS定义相比,有8名患者被新诊断为PH。超声心动图指标肺动脉收缩压(sPAP)[(57.6±7.3)vs(38.5±13.6)mmHg]、最大三尖瓣反流速度(TRVmax)[(360.4±28.9)vs(271.4±52.2)cm/s]和RHC指标mPAP[(22.2±1.3)vs(16.1±2.低压PH组的Pmax[(42.1±5.6) vs (35.6±4.7) mmHg, P=0.006]和mPAP/CO多点斜率[(4.9±1.3) vs (3.6±1.1) mmHg-L-1-min-1,P=0.024]均高于无PH组。mPAPmax 诊断 PH 的 ROC 曲线临界值为 39 mmHg,敏感性为 75.0%,特异性为 76.5%,曲线下面积(AUC)和 95%CI 为 0.816(0.638-0.994)。用于诊断 PH 的多点 mPAP/CO 斜率的 ROC 曲线临界值为 4.44 mmHg-L-1-min-1,敏感性为 75.0%,特异性为 76.5%,AUC(95%CI)为 0.794(0.606-0.983)。结论2022年ESC/ERS指南对PH的血液动力学定义进行修订后,发现了更多患有肺血管疾病的PH患者,从而促进了早期诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Impact of the 2022 ESC/ERS revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension].

Objectives: In the 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines, the hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was revised to mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)>20 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) at rest. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of PH. Methods: Patients with dyspnea or highly suspected PH who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) in Beijing Anzhen hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from September 2021 to October 2022 were enrolled retrospectively. According to resting hemodynamics, the patients were divided into 3 groups: no-PH (mPAP≤20 mmHg) group, low-pressure PH (20 mmHgmax) and mPAP/cardiac output (CO) slope of multi-point in PH. Results: A total of 117 patients were included for analysis, the age was (53.7±17.5) years, 37 (31.6%) patients were male. According to the 2022 ESC/ERS definition, 99 patients were diagnosed as PH, including 8 patients (6.8%) in the low-pressure PH group and 91 patients (77.8%) in the high-pressure PH group. There were 18 patients (15.4%) in the non-PH group. Comparing to the 2015 ESC/ERS definition, 8 patients were newly diagnosed as PH. Echocardiography indexes pulmonary systolic pressure (sPAP) [(57.6±7.3) vs (38.5±13.6) mmHg], max tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRVmax) [(360.4±28.9) vs (271.4±52.2) cm/s] and RHC index mPAP [(22.2±1.3) vs (16.1±2.6) mmHg] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group (all P<0.05). However, further analysis of hemodynamics during exercise showed mPAPmax [(42.1±5.6) vs (35.6±4.7) mmHg, P=0.006] and mPAP/CO slope of multi-point [(4.9±1.3) vs (3.6±1.1) mmHg·L-1·min-1,P=0.024] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group. The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAPmax for the diagnosis of PH was 39 mmHg, with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and the area under the curve (AUC) and 95%CI is 0.816 (0.638-0.994). The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAP/CO slope of multi-point for the diagnosis of PH was 4.44 mmHg·L-1·min-1,with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and an AUC (95%CI) of 0.794 (0.606-0.983). Conclusion: After the revision of the hemodynamic definition of PH in the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, more PH patients with pulmonary vascular disease are detected, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
期刊最新文献
[A prospective phase Ⅱ clinical trial of toripalimab combined with platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer]. [Analysis and reflections on the current status of diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma]. [Application of robot-assisted laparoscopic isthmectomy for the treatment of symptomatic horseshoe kidney]. [Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with TP53 mutation]. [Comparison of microdrill versus diode laser in endoscopic stapedotomy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1