生命最后一周的姑息关怀咨询及相关因素:一项普通人群横断面研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241293818
Susanna Böling, Hanna Gyllensten, My Engström, Emma Lundberg, Johan Berlin, Joakim Öhlén
{"title":"生命最后一周的姑息关怀咨询及相关因素:一项普通人群横断面研究。","authors":"Susanna Böling, Hanna Gyllensten, My Engström, Emma Lundberg, Johan Berlin, Joakim Öhlén","doi":"10.1177/26323524241293818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of access to palliative care services, such as palliative care consultation teams, is crucial to identify areas of improvement for policy and practice. Research on general populations spanning all disease groups and multiple healthcare contexts is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to investigate the sociodemographic, disease- and care-related, and care structure-related factors associated with palliative care consultations for adult patients in the last week of life.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, general population-level study based on linked Swedish national public authority registers and a national palliative care quality register.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population included all adult patients deceased in Sweden between 2013 and 2019 and registered in the Swedish Register of Palliative Care, with an anticipated death, and not enrolled in specialised palliative care. Multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate association with palliative care consultations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 8.2% of the 265,129 participants had received a palliative care consultation in the last week of life. The main multivariable analysis (Model 1) showed that those dying from neoplasms were more likely to receive a palliative care consultation (odds ratio (OR) 8.55, 95% CI 8.15-8.98) than those dying from circulatory diseases. Palliative care consultation was more likely with an increasing number of symptoms (OR 1.35, CI 1.32-1.37). Patients of old age and patients deceased in hospitals were less likely to receive a palliative care consultation. Moreover, factors such as educational attainment, healthcare region, living in a single-person household, and year of death were also associated with a palliative care consultation in the last week of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show inequities in access to palliative care consultations in the last week of life. Considering changes to policy and clinical practice is motivated.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative care consultation in the last week of life and associated factors: a cross-sectional general population study.\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Böling, Hanna Gyllensten, My Engström, Emma Lundberg, Johan Berlin, Joakim Öhlén\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524241293818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of access to palliative care services, such as palliative care consultation teams, is crucial to identify areas of improvement for policy and practice. Research on general populations spanning all disease groups and multiple healthcare contexts is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to investigate the sociodemographic, disease- and care-related, and care structure-related factors associated with palliative care consultations for adult patients in the last week of life.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, general population-level study based on linked Swedish national public authority registers and a national palliative care quality register.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population included all adult patients deceased in Sweden between 2013 and 2019 and registered in the Swedish Register of Palliative Care, with an anticipated death, and not enrolled in specialised palliative care. Multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate association with palliative care consultations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 8.2% of the 265,129 participants had received a palliative care consultation in the last week of life. The main multivariable analysis (Model 1) showed that those dying from neoplasms were more likely to receive a palliative care consultation (odds ratio (OR) 8.55, 95% CI 8.15-8.98) than those dying from circulatory diseases. Palliative care consultation was more likely with an increasing number of symptoms (OR 1.35, CI 1.32-1.37). Patients of old age and patients deceased in hospitals were less likely to receive a palliative care consultation. Moreover, factors such as educational attainment, healthcare region, living in a single-person household, and year of death were also associated with a palliative care consultation in the last week of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show inequities in access to palliative care consultations in the last week of life. Considering changes to policy and clinical practice is motivated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241293818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241293818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解姑息关怀服务(如姑息关怀咨询团队)的可及性对于确定政策和实践的改进领域至关重要。需要对跨越所有疾病群体和多种医疗环境的普通人群进行研究:目的:调查与成年患者生命最后一周的姑息关怀咨询相关的社会人口学、疾病和护理相关以及护理结构相关因素:设计:基于瑞典国家公共机构登记簿和国家姑息治疗质量登记簿的横断面普通人群研究:研究人群包括2013年至2019年期间在瑞典死亡、在瑞典姑息治疗登记册上登记的所有成年患者,这些患者预计会死亡,且未参加专门的姑息治疗。通过多变量逻辑回归分析研究与姑息治疗咨询的关联:在 265 129 名参与者中,共有 8.2% 的人在生命的最后一周接受过姑息关怀咨询。主要的多变量分析(模型1)显示,与循环系统疾病患者相比,死于肿瘤的患者更有可能接受姑息关怀咨询(几率比(OR)8.55,95% CI 8.15-8.98)。症状越多,接受姑息治疗咨询的可能性越大(OR 1.35,CI 1.32-1.37)。老年患者和在医院去世的患者接受姑息治疗咨询的可能性较低。此外,教育程度、医疗保健地区、居住在单人家庭以及死亡年份等因素也与生命最后一周接受姑息关怀咨询有关:我们的研究结果表明,在生命的最后一周,获得姑息关怀咨询的机会并不平等。考虑改变政策和临床实践是有积极意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative care consultation in the last week of life and associated factors: a cross-sectional general population study.

Background: Knowledge of access to palliative care services, such as palliative care consultation teams, is crucial to identify areas of improvement for policy and practice. Research on general populations spanning all disease groups and multiple healthcare contexts is needed.

Objective: The objective was to investigate the sociodemographic, disease- and care-related, and care structure-related factors associated with palliative care consultations for adult patients in the last week of life.

Design: Cross-sectional, general population-level study based on linked Swedish national public authority registers and a national palliative care quality register.

Methods: The study population included all adult patients deceased in Sweden between 2013 and 2019 and registered in the Swedish Register of Palliative Care, with an anticipated death, and not enrolled in specialised palliative care. Multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate association with palliative care consultations.

Results: In total, 8.2% of the 265,129 participants had received a palliative care consultation in the last week of life. The main multivariable analysis (Model 1) showed that those dying from neoplasms were more likely to receive a palliative care consultation (odds ratio (OR) 8.55, 95% CI 8.15-8.98) than those dying from circulatory diseases. Palliative care consultation was more likely with an increasing number of symptoms (OR 1.35, CI 1.32-1.37). Patients of old age and patients deceased in hospitals were less likely to receive a palliative care consultation. Moreover, factors such as educational attainment, healthcare region, living in a single-person household, and year of death were also associated with a palliative care consultation in the last week of life.

Conclusion: Our findings show inequities in access to palliative care consultations in the last week of life. Considering changes to policy and clinical practice is motivated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medical influence: what does success look like? Palliative care consultation in the last week of life and associated factors: a cross-sectional general population study. Using relational ethics to approach equity in palliative care. Fostering timely integrated palliative care in nursing homes through critical companionship: experiences from a Padi-Palli interventional study in France. Experience or perception: What healthcare providers need when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional, a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1