内窥镜鼻窦手术罕见并发症的法医调查:两例报告

Semyon S Plis, Olesya V Veselkina
{"title":"内窥镜鼻窦手术罕见并发症的法医调查:两例报告","authors":"Semyon S Plis, Olesya V Veselkina","doi":"10.1177/19253621241286142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes two cases of rare surgical complications during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and the resulting forensic investigations. The first case involved damage to the skull base and intracerebral artery, leading to a fatal cerebrovascular event, while the second case involved destruction of the medial orbital wall. The clinical and pathological findings are described in detail for each case. In Russia, in cases of disputes regarding medical malpractice, a commission-based expert examination is appointed by the civil court, criminal court, or investigator. This commission includes, in addition to a forensic pathologist, a practicing physician specializing in the field related to the case under consideration. Single-expert examinations for such cases are not provided; the investigation is always conducted jointly by a forensic pathologist and a clinician. It is important to investigate whether the mistake was due to preventable causes or deviations from accepted standards. This can only be done through the joint work of clinicians and forensic pathologists. These two cases are important because they demonstrate how different forensic conclusions can be for patients who undergo the same operation and experience similar severe complications. Despite the similarities, the forensic and legal outcomes were entirely different due to different reasons for the mistakes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"19253621241286142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forensic Investigation of Rare Complications of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Two Case Reports.\",\"authors\":\"Semyon S Plis, Olesya V Veselkina\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19253621241286142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article describes two cases of rare surgical complications during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and the resulting forensic investigations. The first case involved damage to the skull base and intracerebral artery, leading to a fatal cerebrovascular event, while the second case involved destruction of the medial orbital wall. The clinical and pathological findings are described in detail for each case. In Russia, in cases of disputes regarding medical malpractice, a commission-based expert examination is appointed by the civil court, criminal court, or investigator. This commission includes, in addition to a forensic pathologist, a practicing physician specializing in the field related to the case under consideration. Single-expert examinations for such cases are not provided; the investigation is always conducted jointly by a forensic pathologist and a clinician. It is important to investigate whether the mistake was due to preventable causes or deviations from accepted standards. This can only be done through the joint work of clinicians and forensic pathologists. These two cases are important because they demonstrate how different forensic conclusions can be for patients who undergo the same operation and experience similar severe complications. Despite the similarities, the forensic and legal outcomes were entirely different due to different reasons for the mistakes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19253621241286142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556348/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621241286142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621241286142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了两例在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)中出现的罕见手术并发症,以及由此引发的法医调查。第一例涉及颅底和脑内动脉损伤,导致致命的脑血管事件;第二例涉及眼眶内侧壁破坏。本文详细介绍了每个病例的临床和病理结果。在俄罗斯,在医疗事故纠纷案件中,民事法庭、刑事法庭或调查人员会指定一个以委员会为基础的专家鉴定。除法医病理学家外,该委员会还包括一名与审理案件相关领域的专业执业医师。此类案件不提供单一专家检查;调查始终由一名法医病理学家和一名临床医生共同进行。重要的是要调查错误是否是由于可预防的原因或偏离公认的标准造成的。只有通过临床医生和法医病理学家的共同努力才能做到这一点。这两个案例非常重要,因为它们表明,对于接受相同手术并出现类似严重并发症的患者,法医结论可能会有很大不同。尽管有相似之处,但由于错误的原因不同,法医和法律的结果也完全不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forensic Investigation of Rare Complications of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Two Case Reports.

This article describes two cases of rare surgical complications during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and the resulting forensic investigations. The first case involved damage to the skull base and intracerebral artery, leading to a fatal cerebrovascular event, while the second case involved destruction of the medial orbital wall. The clinical and pathological findings are described in detail for each case. In Russia, in cases of disputes regarding medical malpractice, a commission-based expert examination is appointed by the civil court, criminal court, or investigator. This commission includes, in addition to a forensic pathologist, a practicing physician specializing in the field related to the case under consideration. Single-expert examinations for such cases are not provided; the investigation is always conducted jointly by a forensic pathologist and a clinician. It is important to investigate whether the mistake was due to preventable causes or deviations from accepted standards. This can only be done through the joint work of clinicians and forensic pathologists. These two cases are important because they demonstrate how different forensic conclusions can be for patients who undergo the same operation and experience similar severe complications. Despite the similarities, the forensic and legal outcomes were entirely different due to different reasons for the mistakes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Concealed Homicide in a Sexually Abused Child. The Sudden Death of Cardinal Decio Azzolino Junior (1623-1689), the Universal Heir of Queen Christina of Sweden: A Dropsy Case? Deaths Related to New-Onset Seizures After Vaccination. Left Thumb to Left Big Toe: An Uncommon Case of Electrocution Suicide. Forensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 1: Common Questions and Considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1