对来自 ASCO 2024 的 25 位非官方 ASCO 代表的推文进行分析。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100519
Owen Stratton , Alyson Haslam , Vinay Prasad
{"title":"对来自 ASCO 2024 的 25 位非官方 ASCO 代表的推文进行分析。","authors":"Owen Stratton ,&nbsp;Alyson Haslam ,&nbsp;Vinay Prasad","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim of the study</h3><div>The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) hosts an annual conference and is one of the largest medical conferences globally. For ASCO 2024, they selected 25 Featured Voices, advertising them as individuals to follow on Twitter/X throughout the conference. The aim of this study was to characterize tweets from each of the 25 featured individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Brief summary of the methods</h3><div>From May 16, 2024 through June 19, 2024 we filtered tweets by using the twitter advanced search tool and applying the following criteria in the tweet text: #ASCO OR #ASCO24 OR #ASCO2024. Tweets were classified as being about research (yes or no) and if media was included (yes or no). Additional information about research related tweets was gathered, such as whether the research was observational or interventional. If it was interventional, we characterized whether the tweet was supportive, critical, or neutral of the research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find that 229 (28.3 %) of 810 tweets commented on research. Of the 229 research related tweets, 136 (59.4 %) were related to interventional trials of which they were supportive 65.3 % of the time. Media was included in 280 (34.6 %) of 810 tweets. 219 were photos of a person and 80 were selfies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ASCO Featured Voices tweeted more photos, including selfies (n=299), than commentary about research (n=229). When research was referenced, individuals were rarely critical. Trials presented at ASCO have the ability to impact guidelines, so it is important that they are appraised critically and discussed in an unbiased way. How Featured Voices are chosen requires further scrutiny.</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary statement at the end</h3><div>ASCO should disclose financial relationships in the future when selecting Featured Voices to represent the organization and provide insight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of 810 tweets from 25 unofficial ASCO representatives (Featured Voices) at ASCO 2024\",\"authors\":\"Owen Stratton ,&nbsp;Alyson Haslam ,&nbsp;Vinay Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim of the study</h3><div>The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) hosts an annual conference and is one of the largest medical conferences globally. For ASCO 2024, they selected 25 Featured Voices, advertising them as individuals to follow on Twitter/X throughout the conference. The aim of this study was to characterize tweets from each of the 25 featured individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Brief summary of the methods</h3><div>From May 16, 2024 through June 19, 2024 we filtered tweets by using the twitter advanced search tool and applying the following criteria in the tweet text: #ASCO OR #ASCO24 OR #ASCO2024. Tweets were classified as being about research (yes or no) and if media was included (yes or no). Additional information about research related tweets was gathered, such as whether the research was observational or interventional. If it was interventional, we characterized whether the tweet was supportive, critical, or neutral of the research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find that 229 (28.3 %) of 810 tweets commented on research. Of the 229 research related tweets, 136 (59.4 %) were related to interventional trials of which they were supportive 65.3 % of the time. Media was included in 280 (34.6 %) of 810 tweets. 219 were photos of a person and 80 were selfies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ASCO Featured Voices tweeted more photos, including selfies (n=299), than commentary about research (n=229). When research was referenced, individuals were rarely critical. Trials presented at ASCO have the ability to impact guidelines, so it is important that they are appraised critically and discussed in an unbiased way. How Featured Voices are chosen requires further scrutiny.</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary statement at the end</h3><div>ASCO should disclose financial relationships in the future when selecting Featured Voices to represent the organization and provide insight.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)每年举办一次年会,是全球最大的医学会议之一。他们为 ASCO 2024 挑选了 25 位有特色的声音人物,并在整个会议期间在 Twitter/X 上对他们进行宣传。本研究的目的是分析这 25 位特色人物的推文特征:从 2024 年 5 月 16 日到 2024 年 6 月 19 日,我们使用 twitter 高级搜索工具过滤推文,并在推文中应用以下标准:#asco 或 #asco24 或 #asco2024。推文被归类为与研究相关(是或否),以及是否包含媒体(是或否)。我们还收集了与研究相关的推文的其他信息,如研究是观察性的还是干预性的。如果是干预性研究,我们就会描述推文对研究的支持、批评或中立态度:我们发现,在 810 条推文中,有 229 条(28.3%)对研究发表了评论。在这 229 条与研究相关的推文中,136 条(59.4%)与介入性试验有关,其中 65.3% 的推文表示支持。810条推文中有280条(34.6%)涉及媒体:令人担忧的是,包含媒体的推文多于与研究相关的推文。结论:令人担忧的是,包含媒体的推文多于与研究相关的推文。在 ASCO 上展示的试验能够对指南产生影响,因此对这些试验进行批判性评估非常重要,而这对于复杂的方法论来说可能很困难。这项分析提供了数据,并提高了人们的认识,以便在今后的 ASCO 会议上加以改进:美国临床肿瘤学会今后在选择代表该组织发表见解的嘉宾时应披露财务关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of 810 tweets from 25 unofficial ASCO representatives (Featured Voices) at ASCO 2024

Aim of the study

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) hosts an annual conference and is one of the largest medical conferences globally. For ASCO 2024, they selected 25 Featured Voices, advertising them as individuals to follow on Twitter/X throughout the conference. The aim of this study was to characterize tweets from each of the 25 featured individuals.

Brief summary of the methods

From May 16, 2024 through June 19, 2024 we filtered tweets by using the twitter advanced search tool and applying the following criteria in the tweet text: #ASCO OR #ASCO24 OR #ASCO2024. Tweets were classified as being about research (yes or no) and if media was included (yes or no). Additional information about research related tweets was gathered, such as whether the research was observational or interventional. If it was interventional, we characterized whether the tweet was supportive, critical, or neutral of the research.

Results

We find that 229 (28.3 %) of 810 tweets commented on research. Of the 229 research related tweets, 136 (59.4 %) were related to interventional trials of which they were supportive 65.3 % of the time. Media was included in 280 (34.6 %) of 810 tweets. 219 were photos of a person and 80 were selfies.

Conclusion

ASCO Featured Voices tweeted more photos, including selfies (n=299), than commentary about research (n=229). When research was referenced, individuals were rarely critical. Trials presented at ASCO have the ability to impact guidelines, so it is important that they are appraised critically and discussed in an unbiased way. How Featured Voices are chosen requires further scrutiny.

Policy summary statement at the end

ASCO should disclose financial relationships in the future when selecting Featured Voices to represent the organization and provide insight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Cancer research funding in South Asia" [J. Cancer Policy 41 (2024) 100489]. Utilisation Patterns of Radiotherapy Among Older Patients: Insights from Portuguese National Cancer Registry Data. Time in the U.S. and colorectal cancer screening adherence among diverse immigrants Rapid diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer: A realist synthesis Overcoming barriers of cervical cancer elimination in India: A practice to policy level advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1