María Anguita-Gámez, David Vivas, Raquel Ferrandis, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Rafael González-Manzanares, Marysol Echeverri, Jesús Igualada, Isabel Egocheaga, Beatriz Nozal-Mateo, Ane Abad-Motos, Elena Figuero, Nuria Bouzó-Molina, Teresa Lozano, Carlos Álvarez-Ortega, Javier Torres, María José Descalzo, Juan Carlos Catalá, Enrique Martín-Rioboo, Alejandra Moliner, Rocío Rodríguez-Contreras, Manuel Carnero-Alcázar, Francisco Marín, Manuel Anguita
{"title":"高缺血和出血风险患者坚持围手术期抗血栓治疗建议及其对预后的影响。","authors":"María Anguita-Gámez, David Vivas, Raquel Ferrandis, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Rafael González-Manzanares, Marysol Echeverri, Jesús Igualada, Isabel Egocheaga, Beatriz Nozal-Mateo, Ane Abad-Motos, Elena Figuero, Nuria Bouzó-Molina, Teresa Lozano, Carlos Álvarez-Ortega, Javier Torres, María José Descalzo, Juan Carlos Catalá, Enrique Martín-Rioboo, Alejandra Moliner, Rocío Rodríguez-Contreras, Manuel Carnero-Alcázar, Francisco Marín, Manuel Anguita","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>To analyze the clinical impact of the inappropriate use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with high ischemic or hemorrhagic risk during the periprocedural/perisurgical period in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective multicenter observational registry of patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy who required an intervention. The incidence of 30-day events was compared based on the peri-intervention management of antithrombotic treatment and the patients' risk classification (high vs. moderate-to-low risk). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiovascular ischemic events, or bleeding events classified as BARC 2 or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1152 patients were analyzed. Of these, 1.9% had both high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (A);10.8% had high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risk (B); 12% had high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C); and 75.3% had both low-to-moderate risks (D). The prevalence of inappropriate treatment was higher in the subgroup with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C) (62.6% vs 40.9% in subgroup A; P < .05; 40.3% in subgroup B; P < .001; and 39.8% in subgroup D; P < .05). The incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (22.7%) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (20.9%), compared with 3.6% in subgroup C (P < .05) and 5.7% in subgroup D (P < .001). Among patients with inappropriate treatment, the incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (44.4% vs 7.7%; P = .043) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (30% vs 14.8%; P = .042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of inappropriate periprocedural/perisurgical treatment was higher in patients with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk. The incidence of events was higher in patients with high ischemic risk, with inadequate antithrombotic management being associated with a higher event rate in these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to periprocedural antithrombotic treatment recommendations and its prognostic impact in patients with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk.\",\"authors\":\"María Anguita-Gámez, David Vivas, Raquel Ferrandis, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Rafael González-Manzanares, Marysol Echeverri, Jesús Igualada, Isabel Egocheaga, Beatriz Nozal-Mateo, Ane Abad-Motos, Elena Figuero, Nuria Bouzó-Molina, Teresa Lozano, Carlos Álvarez-Ortega, Javier Torres, María José Descalzo, Juan Carlos Catalá, Enrique Martín-Rioboo, Alejandra Moliner, Rocío Rodríguez-Contreras, Manuel Carnero-Alcázar, Francisco Marín, Manuel Anguita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rec.2024.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>To analyze the clinical impact of the inappropriate use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with high ischemic or hemorrhagic risk during the periprocedural/perisurgical period in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective multicenter observational registry of patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy who required an intervention. The incidence of 30-day events was compared based on the peri-intervention management of antithrombotic treatment and the patients' risk classification (high vs. moderate-to-low risk). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiovascular ischemic events, or bleeding events classified as BARC 2 or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1152 patients were analyzed. Of these, 1.9% had both high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (A);10.8% had high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risk (B); 12% had high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C); and 75.3% had both low-to-moderate risks (D). The prevalence of inappropriate treatment was higher in the subgroup with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C) (62.6% vs 40.9% in subgroup A; P < .05; 40.3% in subgroup B; P < .001; and 39.8% in subgroup D; P < .05). The incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (22.7%) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (20.9%), compared with 3.6% in subgroup C (P < .05) and 5.7% in subgroup D (P < .001). Among patients with inappropriate treatment, the incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (44.4% vs 7.7%; P = .043) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (30% vs 14.8%; P = .042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of inappropriate periprocedural/perisurgical treatment was higher in patients with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk. The incidence of events was higher in patients with high ischemic risk, with inadequate antithrombotic management being associated with a higher event rate in these groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.09.010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.09.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adherence to periprocedural antithrombotic treatment recommendations and its prognostic impact in patients with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk.
Introduction and objectives: To analyze the clinical impact of the inappropriate use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with high ischemic or hemorrhagic risk during the periprocedural/perisurgical period in Spain.
Methods: Prospective multicenter observational registry of patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy who required an intervention. The incidence of 30-day events was compared based on the peri-intervention management of antithrombotic treatment and the patients' risk classification (high vs. moderate-to-low risk). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiovascular ischemic events, or bleeding events classified as BARC 2 or higher.
Results: A total of 1152 patients were analyzed. Of these, 1.9% had both high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (A);10.8% had high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risk (B); 12% had high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C); and 75.3% had both low-to-moderate risks (D). The prevalence of inappropriate treatment was higher in the subgroup with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C) (62.6% vs 40.9% in subgroup A; P < .05; 40.3% in subgroup B; P < .001; and 39.8% in subgroup D; P < .05). The incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (22.7%) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (20.9%), compared with 3.6% in subgroup C (P < .05) and 5.7% in subgroup D (P < .001). Among patients with inappropriate treatment, the incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (44.4% vs 7.7%; P = .043) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (30% vs 14.8%; P = .042).
Conclusions: The prevalence of inappropriate periprocedural/perisurgical treatment was higher in patients with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk. The incidence of events was higher in patients with high ischemic risk, with inadequate antithrombotic management being associated with a higher event rate in these groups.