黄热病疫苗接种后的黄热病突破性感染:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 20.9 1区 生物学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Microbe Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.06.004
Jenny L Schnyder, Bache E Bache, Matthijs R A Welkers, René Spijker, Frieder Schaumburg, Abraham Goorhuis, Martin P Grobusch, Hanna K de Jong
{"title":"黄热病疫苗接种后的黄热病突破性感染:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jenny L Schnyder, Bache E Bache, Matthijs R A Welkers, René Spijker, Frieder Schaumburg, Abraham Goorhuis, Martin P Grobusch, Hanna K de Jong","doi":"10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Yellow fever vaccination is considered to provide effective long-term immunity. However, yellow fever breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients have been reported. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to identify and summarise all documented symptomatic yellow fever breakthrough infections in the literature occurring less than 10 years and 10 years or more after primary yellow fever vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Global Index Medicus for records published between Jan 1, 1936 (introduction of yellow fever vaccination) and June 16, 2023. We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series and reports, and epidemiological reports from national and international health organisations reporting symptomatic yellow fever among individuals vaccinated 30 days or more before symptom onset. We excluded cases vaccinated less than 30 days before symptom onset. The primary outcome for the meta-analysis was the proportions of vaccinees among virologically confirmed and probable cases of yellow fever (IgM seroconversion without seroconversion to other flaviviruses). Risk of bias was assessed with an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Records of moderate or good quality (probable or confirmed yellow fever diagnosis with documented proof of previous vaccination) were included for random-effects meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42023450205.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>After reviewing 1975 records, 37 records reported a total of 6951 yellow fever cases, of which 537 were vaccinated. 31 records were of low quality. Nine confirmed and 24 probable cases with proof of previous yellow fever vaccination were identified, all from Brazil. Confirmed cases were vaccinated 3 months to 3 years before symptom onset; of these patients two fell severely ill and died. The pooled proportion of verified yellow fever breakthrough infections among probable and confirmed cases was 3% (95% CI 1-19%). No confirmed yellow fever breakthrough infections were identified occurring 10 years or more after yellow fever vaccination.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Yellow fever breakthrough infections documented in literature are rare, and not necessarily more common 10 years or more after primary yellow fever vaccination. This finding suggests that a single dose of yellow fever vaccination is sufficient to provide lifelong protective immunity against symptomatic yellow fever.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":" ","pages":"100937"},"PeriodicalIF":20.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yellow fever breakthrough infections after yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny L Schnyder, Bache E Bache, Matthijs R A Welkers, René Spijker, Frieder Schaumburg, Abraham Goorhuis, Martin P Grobusch, Hanna K de Jong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Yellow fever vaccination is considered to provide effective long-term immunity. However, yellow fever breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients have been reported. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to identify and summarise all documented symptomatic yellow fever breakthrough infections in the literature occurring less than 10 years and 10 years or more after primary yellow fever vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Global Index Medicus for records published between Jan 1, 1936 (introduction of yellow fever vaccination) and June 16, 2023. We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series and reports, and epidemiological reports from national and international health organisations reporting symptomatic yellow fever among individuals vaccinated 30 days or more before symptom onset. We excluded cases vaccinated less than 30 days before symptom onset. The primary outcome for the meta-analysis was the proportions of vaccinees among virologically confirmed and probable cases of yellow fever (IgM seroconversion without seroconversion to other flaviviruses). Risk of bias was assessed with an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Records of moderate or good quality (probable or confirmed yellow fever diagnosis with documented proof of previous vaccination) were included for random-effects meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42023450205.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>After reviewing 1975 records, 37 records reported a total of 6951 yellow fever cases, of which 537 were vaccinated. 31 records were of low quality. Nine confirmed and 24 probable cases with proof of previous yellow fever vaccination were identified, all from Brazil. Confirmed cases were vaccinated 3 months to 3 years before symptom onset; of these patients two fell severely ill and died. The pooled proportion of verified yellow fever breakthrough infections among probable and confirmed cases was 3% (95% CI 1-19%). No confirmed yellow fever breakthrough infections were identified occurring 10 years or more after yellow fever vaccination.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Yellow fever breakthrough infections documented in literature are rare, and not necessarily more common 10 years or more after primary yellow fever vaccination. This finding suggests that a single dose of yellow fever vaccination is sufficient to provide lifelong protective immunity against symptomatic yellow fever.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Microbe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Microbe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.06.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.06.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接种黄热病疫苗被认为可提供有效的长期免疫力。然而,也有接种过疫苗的患者出现黄热病突破性感染的报道。在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们旨在识别和总结文献中所有有记录的、发生在初次接种黄热病疫苗后 10 年以内和 10 年或以上的症状性黄热病突破性感染:我们检索了 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid) 和 Global Index Medicus 在 1936 年 1 月 1 日(黄热病疫苗接种开始)至 2023 年 6 月 16 日期间发表的记录。我们纳入了前瞻性和回顾性队列研究、系列病例和报告,以及来自国家和国际卫生组织的流行病学报告,报告了在症状出现前 30 天或 30 天以上接种过黄热病疫苗的人中出现的黄热病症状。我们排除了发病前不到 30 天接种疫苗的病例。荟萃分析的主要结果是黄热病病毒学确诊病例和疑似病例(IgM血清转换而无其他黄热病病毒血清转换)中接种者的比例。偏倚风险采用改编版纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。随机效应荟萃分析纳入了中等或良好质量的记录(可能或确诊为黄热病,有文件证明曾接种过疫苗)。本系统综述和荟萃分析已在 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42023450205:审查了 1975 份记录后,37 份记录共报告了 6951 例黄热病病例,其中 537 例已接种疫苗。31 份记录质量不高。经鉴定,9 例确诊病例和 24 例疑似病例有证据证明曾接种过黄热病疫苗,全部来自巴西。确诊病例在症状出现前 3 个月至 3 年接种过疫苗;其中两名患者病情严重并死亡。在疑似病例和确诊病例中,经核实的黄热病突破性感染的总比例为 3% (95% CI 1-19%)。在接种黄热病疫苗 10 年或更长时间后,未发现确诊的黄热病突破性感染:文献中记录的黄热病突破性感染很少见,接种黄热病疫苗 10 年或更长时间后也不一定更常见。这一结果表明,接种一剂黄热病疫苗足以提供针对有症状黄热病的终身保护性免疫:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yellow fever breakthrough infections after yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Yellow fever vaccination is considered to provide effective long-term immunity. However, yellow fever breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients have been reported. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to identify and summarise all documented symptomatic yellow fever breakthrough infections in the literature occurring less than 10 years and 10 years or more after primary yellow fever vaccination.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Global Index Medicus for records published between Jan 1, 1936 (introduction of yellow fever vaccination) and June 16, 2023. We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series and reports, and epidemiological reports from national and international health organisations reporting symptomatic yellow fever among individuals vaccinated 30 days or more before symptom onset. We excluded cases vaccinated less than 30 days before symptom onset. The primary outcome for the meta-analysis was the proportions of vaccinees among virologically confirmed and probable cases of yellow fever (IgM seroconversion without seroconversion to other flaviviruses). Risk of bias was assessed with an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Records of moderate or good quality (probable or confirmed yellow fever diagnosis with documented proof of previous vaccination) were included for random-effects meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42023450205.

Findings: After reviewing 1975 records, 37 records reported a total of 6951 yellow fever cases, of which 537 were vaccinated. 31 records were of low quality. Nine confirmed and 24 probable cases with proof of previous yellow fever vaccination were identified, all from Brazil. Confirmed cases were vaccinated 3 months to 3 years before symptom onset; of these patients two fell severely ill and died. The pooled proportion of verified yellow fever breakthrough infections among probable and confirmed cases was 3% (95% CI 1-19%). No confirmed yellow fever breakthrough infections were identified occurring 10 years or more after yellow fever vaccination.

Interpretation: Yellow fever breakthrough infections documented in literature are rare, and not necessarily more common 10 years or more after primary yellow fever vaccination. This finding suggests that a single dose of yellow fever vaccination is sufficient to provide lifelong protective immunity against symptomatic yellow fever.

Funding: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Microbe
Lancet Microbe Multiple-
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
0.80%
发文量
278
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.
期刊最新文献
Genomic reconstruction of an azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis outbreak and the creation of a multi-locus sequence typing scheme: a retrospective observational and genomic epidemiology study. Reassessing the role of butyrate-producing bacteria in infection risk. Using demographics of patients to inform treatment of shigellosis in England. Variability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipid body content in sputum and its implications for treatment response. Therapeutics for Nipah virus disease: a systematic review to support prioritisation of drug candidates for clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1