将任务从初级保健医生转给护士的效果:系统综述。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Human Resources for Health Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1186/s12960-024-00956-3
Muna Paier-Abuzahra, Nicole Posch, Klaus Jeitler, Thomas Semlitsch, Christina Radl-Karimi, Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Karl Horvath, Andrea Siebenhofer
{"title":"将任务从初级保健医生转给护士的效果:系统综述。","authors":"Muna Paier-Abuzahra, Nicole Posch, Klaus Jeitler, Thomas Semlitsch, Christina Radl-Karimi, Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Karl Horvath, Andrea Siebenhofer","doi":"10.1186/s12960-024-00956-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Task-shifting from primary care physicians (PCPs) to nurses is a means of overcoming PCP shortages and meeting the needs of patients receiving primary care. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to assess the effects of delegation or substitution of PCPs' activities by nurses on patient relevant, clinical, professional and health services-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search for secondary literature in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses that analysed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled, prospective trials in English and German. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened independently by two reviewers. Full-text articles were assessed using the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. After data extraction a narrative synthesis was performed. We defined patient-relevant outcomes as our primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included six systematic reviews. The interventions included first contact, history taking and assessment, patient education, review of drug treatment, referrals to GPs and other health professionals, ordering further investigations and ongoing care. Two meta-analyses showed a relative risk reduction of mortality in favour of nurse-led care, whereby the reduction in one analysis was significant. The effect was highest in the group of more highly qualified nurse practitioners (RR 0.19), as opposed to nurse practitioners (RR 0.76) and registered nurses (RR 0.92). Two meta-analyses showed a relative risk reduction in hospital admissions and patient satisfaction. Whereas care conducted by physicians and registered nurses led to the same outcomes, care conducted by nurse practitioners led to better outcomes (RR 0.74). An analysis according to nursing group showed that patients were more satisfied with treatment by registered nurses (SMD 1.37) than with treatment conducted by nurse practitioners and more qualified nurse practitioners (SMD 0.17). In terms of patient-relevant outcomes, no differences were observed between physician-led care and nurse-led care in terms of physical function, quality of life and pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse-led care is probably as safe or safer than physician-led care in terms of mortality and hospital admissions. However, the impact of nursing staff training has not been sufficiently examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of task-shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: an overview of systematic reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Muna Paier-Abuzahra, Nicole Posch, Klaus Jeitler, Thomas Semlitsch, Christina Radl-Karimi, Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Karl Horvath, Andrea Siebenhofer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12960-024-00956-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Task-shifting from primary care physicians (PCPs) to nurses is a means of overcoming PCP shortages and meeting the needs of patients receiving primary care. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to assess the effects of delegation or substitution of PCPs' activities by nurses on patient relevant, clinical, professional and health services-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search for secondary literature in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses that analysed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled, prospective trials in English and German. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened independently by two reviewers. Full-text articles were assessed using the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. After data extraction a narrative synthesis was performed. We defined patient-relevant outcomes as our primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included six systematic reviews. The interventions included first contact, history taking and assessment, patient education, review of drug treatment, referrals to GPs and other health professionals, ordering further investigations and ongoing care. Two meta-analyses showed a relative risk reduction of mortality in favour of nurse-led care, whereby the reduction in one analysis was significant. The effect was highest in the group of more highly qualified nurse practitioners (RR 0.19), as opposed to nurse practitioners (RR 0.76) and registered nurses (RR 0.92). Two meta-analyses showed a relative risk reduction in hospital admissions and patient satisfaction. Whereas care conducted by physicians and registered nurses led to the same outcomes, care conducted by nurse practitioners led to better outcomes (RR 0.74). An analysis according to nursing group showed that patients were more satisfied with treatment by registered nurses (SMD 1.37) than with treatment conducted by nurse practitioners and more qualified nurse practitioners (SMD 0.17). In terms of patient-relevant outcomes, no differences were observed between physician-led care and nurse-led care in terms of physical function, quality of life and pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse-led care is probably as safe or safer than physician-led care in terms of mortality and hospital admissions. However, the impact of nursing staff training has not been sufficiently examined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resources for Health\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resources for Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00956-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00956-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:将初级保健医生(PCP)的任务转移给护士是克服初级保健医生短缺和满足初级保健患者需求的一种手段。本系统性综述旨在评估护士委托或替代初级保健医生的活动对患者相关、临床、专业和医疗服务相关结果的影响:我们在 Medline、Embase、Pubmed、Cochrane 图书馆和护理及相关健康文献累积索引 (CINAHL) 中对二手文献进行了系统性检索。我们收录了对随机对照试验(RCT)和对照前瞻性试验进行分析的系统综述和荟萃分析(英语和德语)。摘要和全文由两名审稿人独立筛选。全文采用 "概述质量评估问卷 "进行评估。数据提取后进行了叙述性综合。我们将与患者相关的结果定义为主要结果:我们纳入了六篇系统综述。干预措施包括首次接触、病史采集和评估、患者教育、药物治疗复查、转诊至全科医生和其他医疗专业人员、下达进一步检查指令以及持续护理。两项荟萃分析表明,护士主导的护理可降低死亡率的相对风险,其中一项分析结果显示,护士主导的护理可显著降低死亡率。在资历较高的执业护士(RR 0.19)与执业护师(RR 0.76)和注册护士(RR 0.92)之间,护士主导护理的效果最高。两项荟萃分析表明,入院率和患者满意度相对风险降低。医生和注册护士提供的护理结果相同,而执业护士提供的护理结果更好(RR 0.74)。根据护理组别进行的分析表明,患者对注册护士的治疗满意度(SMD 1.37)高于执业护士和资质更高的执业护士的治疗满意度(SMD 0.17)。就与患者相关的结果而言,在身体功能、生活质量和疼痛方面,医生主导的护理与护士主导的护理之间没有发现差异:结论:就死亡率和入院率而言,护士主导型护理可能与医生主导型护理一样安全或更安全。然而,护理人员培训的影响尚未得到充分研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of task-shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: an overview of systematic reviews.

Background: Task-shifting from primary care physicians (PCPs) to nurses is a means of overcoming PCP shortages and meeting the needs of patients receiving primary care. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to assess the effects of delegation or substitution of PCPs' activities by nurses on patient relevant, clinical, professional and health services-related outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for secondary literature in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses that analysed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled, prospective trials in English and German. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened independently by two reviewers. Full-text articles were assessed using the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. After data extraction a narrative synthesis was performed. We defined patient-relevant outcomes as our primary outcomes.

Results: We included six systematic reviews. The interventions included first contact, history taking and assessment, patient education, review of drug treatment, referrals to GPs and other health professionals, ordering further investigations and ongoing care. Two meta-analyses showed a relative risk reduction of mortality in favour of nurse-led care, whereby the reduction in one analysis was significant. The effect was highest in the group of more highly qualified nurse practitioners (RR 0.19), as opposed to nurse practitioners (RR 0.76) and registered nurses (RR 0.92). Two meta-analyses showed a relative risk reduction in hospital admissions and patient satisfaction. Whereas care conducted by physicians and registered nurses led to the same outcomes, care conducted by nurse practitioners led to better outcomes (RR 0.74). An analysis according to nursing group showed that patients were more satisfied with treatment by registered nurses (SMD 1.37) than with treatment conducted by nurse practitioners and more qualified nurse practitioners (SMD 0.17). In terms of patient-relevant outcomes, no differences were observed between physician-led care and nurse-led care in terms of physical function, quality of life and pain.

Conclusion: Nurse-led care is probably as safe or safer than physician-led care in terms of mortality and hospital admissions. However, the impact of nursing staff training has not been sufficiently examined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
期刊最新文献
Surge capacity and practice management challenges of Canadian family physicians during COVID-19: a qualitative study. The effects of organization and community embeddedness on public health professionals' intention to stay during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Predictors of stress among nucleic acid sampling support nurses (NASSNs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A narrative review of pharmacy workforce challenges in Indonesia. Working life expectancy of physicians: the case of primary care physicians in Czechia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1