放射技师遵守规章制度能否促进急诊科快速通道的患者安全?一项回顾性试点研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.014
B. Pearce , S. Uribe , C. Cowling , J.-A. Pinson , W. Smith , J. Sim
{"title":"放射技师遵守规章制度能否促进急诊科快速通道的患者安全?一项回顾性试点研究。","authors":"B. Pearce ,&nbsp;S. Uribe ,&nbsp;C. Cowling ,&nbsp;J.-A. Pinson ,&nbsp;W. Smith ,&nbsp;J. Sim","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiographers in clinical imaging pathways ensure regulatory compliance by justifying X-ray requests, optimising exposure, and communicating urgent findings. In Australia, adherence to Australian regulatory directives is crucial for patient safety, particularly in Emergency Departments (EDs) where immediate radiologist report or guidance may be unavailable. This study explores whether Australian radiographers working within regulatory compliance of justification, optimisation and Preliminary Image Evaluation (PIE) in the ED contribute to improving patient safety?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a retrospective blinded single-phase study, 28 radiographers reviewed 50 cases of single extremity trauma in the ED Fast-Track (FT) pathway. Data analysis assessed compliance with regulatory directives, evaluating justification, optimisation, and accuracy of Preliminary Image Evaluations (PIE) against established standards.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Justification: Radiographers found 67.8 % (n = 881) of X-ray requests compliant and 32.2 % (n = 419) non-compliant. Optimisation: Participants optimised referrals by correcting anatomical selection (52.0 %, n = 676), adjusting the number of images (11.6 %, n = 151), or both (17.5 %, n = 227). PIE: Radiographer PIE demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 94.7 % (CI: 92.9 %–96.6 %), specificity of 89.6 % (CI: 87.0 %–92.2 %), and accuracy of 92.7 % (CI: 91.6 %–93.8 %). The average Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 93.2 % (CI: 92.0–94.9 %), the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 91.9 % (CI: 90.2–95.0 %), and Cohen’s Kappa inter-rater reliability median was K = 0.85, with an average result of K = 0.85 (range: K = 0.74 to K = 0.96).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, radiographer compliance with regulatory standards for justification, optimisation, and PIE is high but not fully consistent. When radiographers adhere to regulations, there is potential to improve patient safety. Collaborative compliance between radiologists, referrers, and radiographers within the ED FT pathway could further improve patient safety outcomes. Additional research, including prospective studies, is necessary to further evaluate radiographer compliance in the ED FT pathway.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Radiographers are professionally obligated to follow Australian regulatory directives for safe medical radiation practice, guided by imaging protocols. Timely and accurate PIE by radiographers can enhance patient safety in ED.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can radiographer regulatory compliance contribute to patient safety in the emergency department fast-track pathway? A retrospective pilot study\",\"authors\":\"B. Pearce ,&nbsp;S. Uribe ,&nbsp;C. Cowling ,&nbsp;J.-A. Pinson ,&nbsp;W. Smith ,&nbsp;J. Sim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiographers in clinical imaging pathways ensure regulatory compliance by justifying X-ray requests, optimising exposure, and communicating urgent findings. In Australia, adherence to Australian regulatory directives is crucial for patient safety, particularly in Emergency Departments (EDs) where immediate radiologist report or guidance may be unavailable. This study explores whether Australian radiographers working within regulatory compliance of justification, optimisation and Preliminary Image Evaluation (PIE) in the ED contribute to improving patient safety?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a retrospective blinded single-phase study, 28 radiographers reviewed 50 cases of single extremity trauma in the ED Fast-Track (FT) pathway. Data analysis assessed compliance with regulatory directives, evaluating justification, optimisation, and accuracy of Preliminary Image Evaluations (PIE) against established standards.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Justification: Radiographers found 67.8 % (n = 881) of X-ray requests compliant and 32.2 % (n = 419) non-compliant. Optimisation: Participants optimised referrals by correcting anatomical selection (52.0 %, n = 676), adjusting the number of images (11.6 %, n = 151), or both (17.5 %, n = 227). PIE: Radiographer PIE demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 94.7 % (CI: 92.9 %–96.6 %), specificity of 89.6 % (CI: 87.0 %–92.2 %), and accuracy of 92.7 % (CI: 91.6 %–93.8 %). The average Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 93.2 % (CI: 92.0–94.9 %), the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 91.9 % (CI: 90.2–95.0 %), and Cohen’s Kappa inter-rater reliability median was K = 0.85, with an average result of K = 0.85 (range: K = 0.74 to K = 0.96).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, radiographer compliance with regulatory standards for justification, optimisation, and PIE is high but not fully consistent. When radiographers adhere to regulations, there is potential to improve patient safety. Collaborative compliance between radiologists, referrers, and radiographers within the ED FT pathway could further improve patient safety outcomes. Additional research, including prospective studies, is necessary to further evaluate radiographer compliance in the ED FT pathway.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Radiographers are professionally obligated to follow Australian regulatory directives for safe medical radiation practice, guided by imaging protocols. Timely and accurate PIE by radiographers can enhance patient safety in ED.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 53-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:临床成像路径中的放射技师通过证明 X 射线请求的合理性、优化曝光和传达紧急发现,确保符合法规要求。在澳大利亚,遵守澳大利亚的监管指令对患者安全至关重要,尤其是在急诊科(ED),放射科医生可能无法提供即时报告或指导。本研究探讨了澳大利亚放射技师在急诊室工作时是否遵守了合理、优化和初步图像评估(PIE)的规定,是否有助于提高患者安全?在一项回顾性盲法单相研究中,28 名放射技师对急诊室快速通道 (FT) 中的 50 例单侧四肢创伤病例进行了审查。数据分析评估了监管指令的遵守情况,根据既定标准评估了初步图像评估(PIE)的合理性、优化和准确性:结果:合理性:放射技师发现67.8%(n=881)的X光请求符合要求,32.2%(n=419)不符合要求。优化:参与者通过纠正解剖选择(52.0%,n = 676)、调整图像数量(11.6%,n = 151)或两者(17.5%,n = 227)来优化转诊。PIE:放射技师 PIE 的平均灵敏度为 94.7 %(CI:92.9 %-96.6 %),特异度为 89.6 %(CI:87.0 %-92.2 %),准确度为 92.7 %(CI:91.6 %-93.8 %)。平均阳性预测值(PPV)为 93.2 %(CI:92.0-94.9 %),阴性预测值(NPV)为 91.9 %(CI:90.2-95.0 %),Cohen's Kappa评分者间可靠性中位数为 K = 0.85,平均结果为 K = 0.85(范围:K = 0.74 至 K = 0.96):在这项研究中,放射技师对合理性、优化和PIE等监管标准的遵守程度较高,但并不完全一致。如果放射技师遵守相关规定,就有可能提高患者安全。放射科医生、转诊医生和放射技师在急诊室快速转诊路径中的合作合规性可进一步改善患者安全结果。有必要开展更多的研究,包括前瞻性研究,以进一步评估放射技师在急诊室急诊途径中的合规性:放射技师的职业义务是在成像协议的指导下,遵守澳大利亚有关安全医疗放射实践的监管指令。放射技师及时、准确地进行 PIE 可提高急诊室患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can radiographer regulatory compliance contribute to patient safety in the emergency department fast-track pathway? A retrospective pilot study

Introduction

Radiographers in clinical imaging pathways ensure regulatory compliance by justifying X-ray requests, optimising exposure, and communicating urgent findings. In Australia, adherence to Australian regulatory directives is crucial for patient safety, particularly in Emergency Departments (EDs) where immediate radiologist report or guidance may be unavailable. This study explores whether Australian radiographers working within regulatory compliance of justification, optimisation and Preliminary Image Evaluation (PIE) in the ED contribute to improving patient safety?

Methods

In a retrospective blinded single-phase study, 28 radiographers reviewed 50 cases of single extremity trauma in the ED Fast-Track (FT) pathway. Data analysis assessed compliance with regulatory directives, evaluating justification, optimisation, and accuracy of Preliminary Image Evaluations (PIE) against established standards.

Results

Justification: Radiographers found 67.8 % (n = 881) of X-ray requests compliant and 32.2 % (n = 419) non-compliant. Optimisation: Participants optimised referrals by correcting anatomical selection (52.0 %, n = 676), adjusting the number of images (11.6 %, n = 151), or both (17.5 %, n = 227). PIE: Radiographer PIE demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 94.7 % (CI: 92.9 %–96.6 %), specificity of 89.6 % (CI: 87.0 %–92.2 %), and accuracy of 92.7 % (CI: 91.6 %–93.8 %). The average Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 93.2 % (CI: 92.0–94.9 %), the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 91.9 % (CI: 90.2–95.0 %), and Cohen’s Kappa inter-rater reliability median was K = 0.85, with an average result of K = 0.85 (range: K = 0.74 to K = 0.96).

Conclusion

In this study, radiographer compliance with regulatory standards for justification, optimisation, and PIE is high but not fully consistent. When radiographers adhere to regulations, there is potential to improve patient safety. Collaborative compliance between radiologists, referrers, and radiographers within the ED FT pathway could further improve patient safety outcomes. Additional research, including prospective studies, is necessary to further evaluate radiographer compliance in the ED FT pathway.

Implications for practice

Radiographers are professionally obligated to follow Australian regulatory directives for safe medical radiation practice, guided by imaging protocols. Timely and accurate PIE by radiographers can enhance patient safety in ED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
"I used their criticisms as my weapon to succeed" Experiences in the dual learning environment of Black, Asian, and ethnically diverse therapeutic radiographer undergraduate students - results of a UK survey. Radiographers' perspective of patient safety at ultrasound units in radiology departments. Uniformity test in three-dimensional rotational angiography: Novel tools and methods for advanced performance evaluation. Co-production of a novel intervention targeting obesity-related barriers to mammographic screening participation. Communicating the risk of recall in mammography screening - Enskilment in breast radiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1