可观察但不可观察的健康数字与自述健康状况相关:Nhanes 2017-2020.

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1177/15598276241291451
Michael DeDonno, Bella-Christina Objio, Alexis Crowder
{"title":"可观察但不可观察的健康数字与自述健康状况相关:Nhanes 2017-2020.","authors":"Michael DeDonno, Bella-Christina Objio, Alexis Crowder","doi":"10.1177/15598276241291451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Present study explored the influence of self-reported health on diff between observable and unobservable health factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data obtained through the 2017-2020 pre-pandemic dataset of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A series of analyses of covariance were conducted with self-reported health as the independent variable, and measures of blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting glucose and total cholesterol as dependent variables. Family income served as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed significant differences in self-reported health and blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and fasting glucose. Individuals who rated their health excellent or very good tended to have better health numbers than those who rated their health as fair or poor. No statistically significant difference was found with self-reported health and cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible that health numbers that can be observed (or assessed) at home, without a health care professional, may be more aligned with how individuals perceive their own health. Health care professionals may want to further help patients recognize their own health status. The use of wearable technologies may provide added health information resulting in more accurate perception of health. A more accurate perception of a patient's own health may aid health care professionals in further improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15598276241291451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observable, but Not Unobservable Health Numbers are Associated With Self-Reported Health: NHANES 2017-2020.\",\"authors\":\"Michael DeDonno, Bella-Christina Objio, Alexis Crowder\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15598276241291451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Present study explored the influence of self-reported health on diff between observable and unobservable health factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data obtained through the 2017-2020 pre-pandemic dataset of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A series of analyses of covariance were conducted with self-reported health as the independent variable, and measures of blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting glucose and total cholesterol as dependent variables. Family income served as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed significant differences in self-reported health and blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and fasting glucose. Individuals who rated their health excellent or very good tended to have better health numbers than those who rated their health as fair or poor. No statistically significant difference was found with self-reported health and cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible that health numbers that can be observed (or assessed) at home, without a health care professional, may be more aligned with how individuals perceive their own health. Health care professionals may want to further help patients recognize their own health status. The use of wearable technologies may provide added health information resulting in more accurate perception of health. A more accurate perception of a patient's own health may aid health care professionals in further improving patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15598276241291451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556545/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241291451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241291451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究探讨了自我报告的健康状况对可观察和不可观察健康因素之间差异的影响:数据来自 2017-2020 年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)大流行前的数据集。以自我报告的健康状况为自变量,以血压、腰臀比、空腹血糖和总胆固醇的测量值为因变量,进行了一系列协方差分析。家庭收入为协变量:结果显示,自我健康报告与血压、腰臀比和空腹血糖之间存在明显差异。健康状况为 "优 "或 "良 "的人往往比健康状况为 "一般 "或 "差 "的人拥有更好的健康数据。自我报告的健康状况和胆固醇在统计学上没有明显差异:在没有医护人员在场的情况下,可以在家中观察(或评估)的健康数据可能更符合个人对自身健康的看法。医护人员可能希望进一步帮助患者认识自己的健康状况。可穿戴技术的使用可提供更多的健康信息,从而使人们对健康的感知更加准确。更准确地感知患者自身的健康状况可以帮助医护人员进一步改善对患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observable, but Not Unobservable Health Numbers are Associated With Self-Reported Health: NHANES 2017-2020.

Objective: Present study explored the influence of self-reported health on diff between observable and unobservable health factors.

Method: Data obtained through the 2017-2020 pre-pandemic dataset of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A series of analyses of covariance were conducted with self-reported health as the independent variable, and measures of blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting glucose and total cholesterol as dependent variables. Family income served as a covariate.

Results: Results revealed significant differences in self-reported health and blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and fasting glucose. Individuals who rated their health excellent or very good tended to have better health numbers than those who rated their health as fair or poor. No statistically significant difference was found with self-reported health and cholesterol.

Conclusion: It is possible that health numbers that can be observed (or assessed) at home, without a health care professional, may be more aligned with how individuals perceive their own health. Health care professionals may want to further help patients recognize their own health status. The use of wearable technologies may provide added health information resulting in more accurate perception of health. A more accurate perception of a patient's own health may aid health care professionals in further improving patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
期刊最新文献
Health and Well-Being Coaching Adjuvant to GLP-1 Induced Weight Loss. Habit Formation in Older Adults. Impact of Physicians' Perception of Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) on the Practice of Lifestyle Medicine. Findings From a Family Physicians Survey. Recovery Horizons: Nature-Based Activities as Adjunctive Treatments for Co-Occurring Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorders. A Novel Scale of Lifestyle Physical Activity: Measure Description and Intervention Responsiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1