在线生活方式医学继续医学教育(CME)课程的完成可预测临床医生对生活方式医学知识、信心和实践的增加。

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1177/15598276241279523
Meghan L Ames, Kara Livingston Staffier, Alexandra Kees, Kelly Freeman, Paulina Shetty, Joel Gittelsohn, Micaela C Karlsen
{"title":"在线生活方式医学继续医学教育(CME)课程的完成可预测临床医生对生活方式医学知识、信心和实践的增加。","authors":"Meghan L Ames, Kara Livingston Staffier, Alexandra Kees, Kelly Freeman, Paulina Shetty, Joel Gittelsohn, Micaela C Karlsen","doi":"10.1177/15598276241279523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite growing evidence linking lifestyle changes to disease reversal, lifestyle medicine (LM) is not widely practiced. Lack of clinician training and knowledge is cited as a barrier to LM adoption. This study measures changes in LM knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice behaviors following completion of a 5.5-h, asynchronous, online continuing medical education (CME) course. <b>Methods:</b> Participants completed a pre- and post-course survey. A repeated-measures linear model tested changes in knowledge, confidence, interest, experience, and practice of LM, after adjusting for age, gender, race, ethnicity, clinical degree/licensure, and presence of a health system value-based care model. <b>Results:</b> Surveys from n = 2954 course participants were analyzed. Overall, statistically significant improvements were observed in self-reported knowledge (+.47 of points) and confidence (+.53 of points) of LM. Participants across the sample reported greater frequency (+.08 of 5 points) and reach (+.10 of 5 points) of LM with their patients (p<.0001 for both). <b>Discussion:</b> This study demonstrated that a brief, scalable, online CME course can improve LM knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and practice. Future research should examine long-term practice changes as well as differences in outcomes across types of healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15598276241279523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Lifestyle Medicine Continuing Medical Education (CME) Course Completion Predicts Increases in Clinician Knowledge, Confidence, and Practice of Lifestyle Medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan L Ames, Kara Livingston Staffier, Alexandra Kees, Kelly Freeman, Paulina Shetty, Joel Gittelsohn, Micaela C Karlsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15598276241279523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite growing evidence linking lifestyle changes to disease reversal, lifestyle medicine (LM) is not widely practiced. Lack of clinician training and knowledge is cited as a barrier to LM adoption. This study measures changes in LM knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice behaviors following completion of a 5.5-h, asynchronous, online continuing medical education (CME) course. <b>Methods:</b> Participants completed a pre- and post-course survey. A repeated-measures linear model tested changes in knowledge, confidence, interest, experience, and practice of LM, after adjusting for age, gender, race, ethnicity, clinical degree/licensure, and presence of a health system value-based care model. <b>Results:</b> Surveys from n = 2954 course participants were analyzed. Overall, statistically significant improvements were observed in self-reported knowledge (+.47 of points) and confidence (+.53 of points) of LM. Participants across the sample reported greater frequency (+.08 of 5 points) and reach (+.10 of 5 points) of LM with their patients (p<.0001 for both). <b>Discussion:</b> This study demonstrated that a brief, scalable, online CME course can improve LM knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and practice. Future research should examine long-term practice changes as well as differences in outcomes across types of healthcare professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15598276241279523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241279523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241279523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管越来越多的证据表明改变生活方式与疾病逆转有关,但生活方式医学(LM)并未得到广泛应用。临床医生缺乏培训和知识被认为是采用生活方式医学的一个障碍。本研究测量了完成 5.5 小时异步在线继续医学教育(CME)课程后生活方式医学知识、态度、信心和实践行为的变化。研究方法学员完成课前和课后调查。在对年龄、性别、种族、民族、临床学位/执照以及是否存在基于价值的医疗保健模式进行调整后,一个重复测量线性模型测试了LM在知识、信心、兴趣、经验和实践方面的变化。结果:分析了来自 2954 名课程参与者的调查问卷。总体而言,在自我报告的 LM 知识(+.47 个点)和信心(+.53 个点)方面,观察到明显的统计学进步。所有样本的参与者都报告说,他们与病人进行 LM 的频率(+.08,共 5 分)和达到率(+.10,共 5 分)都有所提高(讨论:本研究表明,简短、可扩展的在线继续医学教育课程可以提高 LM 的知识、信心、态度和实践。未来的研究应考察长期的实践变化以及不同类型医护人员的成果差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online Lifestyle Medicine Continuing Medical Education (CME) Course Completion Predicts Increases in Clinician Knowledge, Confidence, and Practice of Lifestyle Medicine.

Introduction: Despite growing evidence linking lifestyle changes to disease reversal, lifestyle medicine (LM) is not widely practiced. Lack of clinician training and knowledge is cited as a barrier to LM adoption. This study measures changes in LM knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice behaviors following completion of a 5.5-h, asynchronous, online continuing medical education (CME) course. Methods: Participants completed a pre- and post-course survey. A repeated-measures linear model tested changes in knowledge, confidence, interest, experience, and practice of LM, after adjusting for age, gender, race, ethnicity, clinical degree/licensure, and presence of a health system value-based care model. Results: Surveys from n = 2954 course participants were analyzed. Overall, statistically significant improvements were observed in self-reported knowledge (+.47 of points) and confidence (+.53 of points) of LM. Participants across the sample reported greater frequency (+.08 of 5 points) and reach (+.10 of 5 points) of LM with their patients (p<.0001 for both). Discussion: This study demonstrated that a brief, scalable, online CME course can improve LM knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and practice. Future research should examine long-term practice changes as well as differences in outcomes across types of healthcare professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
期刊最新文献
Health and Well-Being Coaching Adjuvant to GLP-1 Induced Weight Loss. Habit Formation in Older Adults. Impact of Physicians' Perception of Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) on the Practice of Lifestyle Medicine. Findings From a Family Physicians Survey. Recovery Horizons: Nature-Based Activities as Adjunctive Treatments for Co-Occurring Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorders. A Novel Scale of Lifestyle Physical Activity: Measure Description and Intervention Responsiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1