与安宁疗护病人体验相关的设施和社区层面的因素。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Palliative & Supportive Care Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1017/S1478951524000907
Mengying He, Ganisher Davlyatov, Gregory Orewa, Haiyan Qu, Robert Weech-Maldonado
{"title":"与安宁疗护病人体验相关的设施和社区层面的因素。","authors":"Mengying He, Ganisher Davlyatov, Gregory Orewa, Haiyan Qu, Robert Weech-Maldonado","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524000907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mandated by the Affordable Care Act of 2010, hospices were required to provide information regarding the Hospice Quality Reporting Program, with a reduced reimbursement tied to hospices if they fail to submit data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between hospice organizational and community factors and quality of hospice care as measured by patient experience through Hospice Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS®) survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used secondary data from Hospice Compare, Healthcare Cost Report Information System Dataset, Rural-urban commuting area codes, and the American Community Survey to examine the relationship between hospice patient/family experience and hospice organizational-level and community-level factors for the period 2017-2020. The unit of analysis was hospice-year observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For-profit and chain-affiliated hospices were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores. Organizational longevity and Medicare payer mix were positively associated with CAHPS® scores. Hospice community factors including competition, per capita income, and the racial/ethnic minorities' percentage were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Hospice organizational and community factors were related to hospice quality of care. Interventions that account for organizational and community factors may be needed to improve patient/family experience of hospice care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facility- and community-level factors associated with hospice patient experience.\",\"authors\":\"Mengying He, Ganisher Davlyatov, Gregory Orewa, Haiyan Qu, Robert Weech-Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478951524000907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mandated by the Affordable Care Act of 2010, hospices were required to provide information regarding the Hospice Quality Reporting Program, with a reduced reimbursement tied to hospices if they fail to submit data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between hospice organizational and community factors and quality of hospice care as measured by patient experience through Hospice Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS®) survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used secondary data from Hospice Compare, Healthcare Cost Report Information System Dataset, Rural-urban commuting area codes, and the American Community Survey to examine the relationship between hospice patient/family experience and hospice organizational-level and community-level factors for the period 2017-2020. The unit of analysis was hospice-year observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For-profit and chain-affiliated hospices were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores. Organizational longevity and Medicare payer mix were positively associated with CAHPS® scores. Hospice community factors including competition, per capita income, and the racial/ethnic minorities' percentage were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Hospice organizational and community factors were related to hospice quality of care. Interventions that account for organizational and community factors may be needed to improve patient/family experience of hospice care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524000907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524000907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:根据 2010 年《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act of 2010)的规定,安宁疗护机构必须提供有关安宁疗护质量报告计划的信息,如果安宁疗护机构未能向医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)提交数据,其报销额度将被降低。本研究的目的是研究安宁疗护组织和社区因素与安宁疗护质量之间的关联,安宁疗护质量通过安宁疗护医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS®)调查的患者体验来衡量:我们利用安宁疗护比较、医疗成本报告信息系统数据集、城乡通勤区代码和美国社区调查的二手数据,研究了2017-2020年间安宁疗护患者/家属体验与安宁疗护组织层面和社区层面因素之间的关系。分析单位为安宁疗护年观测值:营利性安宁疗护机构和连锁安宁疗护机构与 CAHPS® 评分呈负相关。组织寿命和医疗保险支付方组合与 CAHPS® 分数呈正相关。安宁疗护社区因素(包括竞争、人均收入和少数种族/族裔比例)与 CAHPS® 分数呈负相关:安宁疗护组织和社区因素与安宁疗护质量有关。可能需要考虑组织和社区因素的干预措施来改善病人/家属的安宁疗护体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facility- and community-level factors associated with hospice patient experience.

Objectives: Mandated by the Affordable Care Act of 2010, hospices were required to provide information regarding the Hospice Quality Reporting Program, with a reduced reimbursement tied to hospices if they fail to submit data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between hospice organizational and community factors and quality of hospice care as measured by patient experience through Hospice Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS®) survey.

Methods: We used secondary data from Hospice Compare, Healthcare Cost Report Information System Dataset, Rural-urban commuting area codes, and the American Community Survey to examine the relationship between hospice patient/family experience and hospice organizational-level and community-level factors for the period 2017-2020. The unit of analysis was hospice-year observations.

Results: For-profit and chain-affiliated hospices were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores. Organizational longevity and Medicare payer mix were positively associated with CAHPS® scores. Hospice community factors including competition, per capita income, and the racial/ethnic minorities' percentage were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores.

Significance of results: Hospice organizational and community factors were related to hospice quality of care. Interventions that account for organizational and community factors may be needed to improve patient/family experience of hospice care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
期刊最新文献
An interpretative qualitative case study of a Compassionate Cities initiative in the United Kingdom: Lessons for implementation in other settings. Stigma in Mexican patients with Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) - Brief version. Benefit-finding in children with advanced cancer and their parents. Predictors of mortality among older adults discharged to or readmitted from a skilled nursing facility. Nurses' models of spiritual care: Predictors of spiritual care competence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1