抗体药物共轭物暴露与不良事件关系的 Meta 分析。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1002/jcph.6160
Cheng Wang, Linda Irons, Holly Kimko, Dhaval K Shah
{"title":"抗体药物共轭物暴露与不良事件关系的 Meta 分析。","authors":"Cheng Wang, Linda Irons, Holly Kimko, Dhaval K Shah","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a vital class of therapeutics in oncology because of their ability to selectively deliver potent drug molecules to tumor cells. However, ADC-associated toxicities cause high failure rates in the clinic and hinder their full potential. Due to the complex structure and pharmacokinetics of ADCs, it is challenging to identify the drivers of their toxicities. Here, quantitative analysis was performed to correlate the incidence of clinical adverse events (AEs) with nine different commonly measured exposure parameters collected from study-level summary data. We considered ADC analytes for different classes of ADCs, to identify ADC analytes that are strongly associated with the AEs for ADCs. Published clinical exposure and safety data for any grade and grade ≥3 AEs from 40 publications across six ADCs and three payloads were collected and analyzed. Exposure-AE relationships were quantified using logit models, and the strength of the correlations and rank order were determined. The analysis suggests that deruxtecan ADC-related toxicities correlated most strongly with the exposure of the free payload; monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC-related toxicities correlated with the free MMAE area under the curve; and pyrrolobenzodiazepine ADC-related toxicities correlated with no specific analyte but the dose. These findings agree with the published literature and support the notion that AE profiles are often shared by ADCs that deliver the same cytotoxic payload. The exposure-AE relationships presented here, together with identification of the most informative ADC analytes, may facilitate more focused mechanistic studies on the drivers of clinical AEs and could support dosing decisions during clinical development of ADCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Exposure-Adverse Event Relationships for Antibody-Drug Conjugates.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Wang, Linda Irons, Holly Kimko, Dhaval K Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.6160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a vital class of therapeutics in oncology because of their ability to selectively deliver potent drug molecules to tumor cells. However, ADC-associated toxicities cause high failure rates in the clinic and hinder their full potential. Due to the complex structure and pharmacokinetics of ADCs, it is challenging to identify the drivers of their toxicities. Here, quantitative analysis was performed to correlate the incidence of clinical adverse events (AEs) with nine different commonly measured exposure parameters collected from study-level summary data. We considered ADC analytes for different classes of ADCs, to identify ADC analytes that are strongly associated with the AEs for ADCs. Published clinical exposure and safety data for any grade and grade ≥3 AEs from 40 publications across six ADCs and three payloads were collected and analyzed. Exposure-AE relationships were quantified using logit models, and the strength of the correlations and rank order were determined. The analysis suggests that deruxtecan ADC-related toxicities correlated most strongly with the exposure of the free payload; monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC-related toxicities correlated with the free MMAE area under the curve; and pyrrolobenzodiazepine ADC-related toxicities correlated with no specific analyte but the dose. These findings agree with the published literature and support the notion that AE profiles are often shared by ADCs that deliver the same cytotoxic payload. The exposure-AE relationships presented here, together with identification of the most informative ADC analytes, may facilitate more focused mechanistic studies on the drivers of clinical AEs and could support dosing decisions during clinical development of ADCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.6160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.6160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗体药物共轭物(ADC)能够选择性地向肿瘤细胞递送强效药物分子,因此已成为肿瘤学中一类重要的治疗药物。然而,与 ADC 相关的毒性导致其在临床上的失败率很高,阻碍了其潜力的充分发挥。由于 ADC 的结构和药代动力学非常复杂,因此确定其毒性的驱动因素非常具有挑战性。在此,我们进行了定量分析,将临床不良事件(AEs)的发生率与从研究水平汇总数据中收集的九种不同的常用测量暴露参数相关联。我们考虑了不同类别 ADC 的 ADC 分析物,以确定与 ADC 不良事件密切相关的 ADC 分析物。我们收集并分析了 40 篇出版物中已发表的六种 ADC 和三种有效载荷的任何等级和等级≥3 的 AE 的临床暴露和安全性数据。使用Logit模型对暴露-AE关系进行了量化,并确定了相关性的强度和排序。分析表明,德鲁替康 ADC 相关毒性与游离有效载荷的暴露相关性最强;一甲基乌司他丁 E (MMAE) ADC 相关毒性与游离 MMAE 的曲线下面积相关;吡咯并二氮杂卓 ADC 相关毒性与除剂量外的任何特定分析物无关。这些发现与已发表的文献一致,并支持这样一种观点,即提供相同细胞毒性有效载荷的 ADC 通常具有共同的 AE 特征。本文介绍的暴露-AE关系以及对最有参考价值的ADC分析物的鉴定,可能有助于对临床AE的驱动因素进行更有针对性的机理研究,并能在ADC的临床开发过程中为剂量决策提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta-Analysis of Exposure-Adverse Event Relationships for Antibody-Drug Conjugates.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a vital class of therapeutics in oncology because of their ability to selectively deliver potent drug molecules to tumor cells. However, ADC-associated toxicities cause high failure rates in the clinic and hinder their full potential. Due to the complex structure and pharmacokinetics of ADCs, it is challenging to identify the drivers of their toxicities. Here, quantitative analysis was performed to correlate the incidence of clinical adverse events (AEs) with nine different commonly measured exposure parameters collected from study-level summary data. We considered ADC analytes for different classes of ADCs, to identify ADC analytes that are strongly associated with the AEs for ADCs. Published clinical exposure and safety data for any grade and grade ≥3 AEs from 40 publications across six ADCs and three payloads were collected and analyzed. Exposure-AE relationships were quantified using logit models, and the strength of the correlations and rank order were determined. The analysis suggests that deruxtecan ADC-related toxicities correlated most strongly with the exposure of the free payload; monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC-related toxicities correlated with the free MMAE area under the curve; and pyrrolobenzodiazepine ADC-related toxicities correlated with no specific analyte but the dose. These findings agree with the published literature and support the notion that AE profiles are often shared by ADCs that deliver the same cytotoxic payload. The exposure-AE relationships presented here, together with identification of the most informative ADC analytes, may facilitate more focused mechanistic studies on the drivers of clinical AEs and could support dosing decisions during clinical development of ADCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Garadacimab Following Single-Dose Administration in Healthy Japanese and White Adults. Sentinel Dosing-Time for a Risk-Based Approach? Relative Bioavailability of Dordaviprone (ONC201) is Not Affected by Co-Administration of the Proton-Pump Inhibitor Rabeprazole. Patients in Clinical Trials are Sub-Optimally Protected for Drug-Drug Interactions: A Call for Action. Results of the ACTION-Galactosemia Kids Study to Evaluate the Effects of Govorestat in Pediatric Patients with Classic Galactosemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1