开发合格的护理教育评估项目:进度测试经验。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104199
Bruna Moreno Dias , Lúcia Marta Giunta da Silva , Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho , Valdes Roberto Bollela , Carmen Silvia Gabriel
{"title":"开发合格的护理教育评估项目:进度测试经验。","authors":"Bruna Moreno Dias ,&nbsp;Lúcia Marta Giunta da Silva ,&nbsp;Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho ,&nbsp;Valdes Roberto Bollela ,&nbsp;Carmen Silvia Gabriel","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To analyze the psychometric characteristics of items in the nursing inter-institutional progress testing for the years 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Progress testing is a validated method for evaluating professional undergraduate education, aimed at identifying knowledge gain in a continuous and progressive manner, with potential benefits for nursing education. However, for its results to be useful, the evaluation items used in the test must have good psychometric performance.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 377 items (multiple-choice questions) was applied to 4678 students in four years of progress testing. The difficulty and discrimination indexes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA and simple linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average difficulty index of the test items ranged between 0.39 and 0.46. The areas of child and adolescent health, women's health and adult health had the most difficult items, while the areas of management, mental health and public health had the least difficult items. Discrimination index ranged from 0.35 to 0.43. There was a difference between discrimination index between the years of application (p &lt; 0.001), with a significant increase in the discrimination index (p &lt; 0.001) in the trend analysis. Students in the final years showed lower levels of difficulty and discrimination when compared with students in the initial years, demonstrating that the test is easier and there is less dispersion of performance among students in the final years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The items are not difficult and have good discrimination. A gradual annual increase in the discrimination index of the items was observed. This study provides useful information for the psychometric analysis and quality assurance of knowledge assessment items, both for the implementation of similar PT experiences and in the use of multiple-choice questions for other knowledge assessment purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 104199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of qualified items for nursing education assessment: The progress testing experience\",\"authors\":\"Bruna Moreno Dias ,&nbsp;Lúcia Marta Giunta da Silva ,&nbsp;Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho ,&nbsp;Valdes Roberto Bollela ,&nbsp;Carmen Silvia Gabriel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To analyze the psychometric characteristics of items in the nursing inter-institutional progress testing for the years 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Progress testing is a validated method for evaluating professional undergraduate education, aimed at identifying knowledge gain in a continuous and progressive manner, with potential benefits for nursing education. However, for its results to be useful, the evaluation items used in the test must have good psychometric performance.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 377 items (multiple-choice questions) was applied to 4678 students in four years of progress testing. The difficulty and discrimination indexes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA and simple linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average difficulty index of the test items ranged between 0.39 and 0.46. The areas of child and adolescent health, women's health and adult health had the most difficult items, while the areas of management, mental health and public health had the least difficult items. Discrimination index ranged from 0.35 to 0.43. There was a difference between discrimination index between the years of application (p &lt; 0.001), with a significant increase in the discrimination index (p &lt; 0.001) in the trend analysis. Students in the final years showed lower levels of difficulty and discrimination when compared with students in the initial years, demonstrating that the test is easier and there is less dispersion of performance among students in the final years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The items are not difficult and have good discrimination. A gradual annual increase in the discrimination index of the items was observed. This study provides useful information for the psychometric analysis and quality assurance of knowledge assessment items, both for the implementation of similar PT experiences and in the use of multiple-choice questions for other knowledge assessment purposes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324003287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324003287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析 2019 年、2021 年、2022 年和 2023 年护理院校间进度测试项目的心理测量特征:进度测试是评价专业本科教育的一种有效方法,旨在以持续和渐进的方式确定知识的获得情况,对护理教育具有潜在的益处。然而,要使其结果有用,测试中使用的评价项目必须具有良好的心理测量性能:设计:横断面研究:方法:在四年的进展测试中,对 4678 名学生进行了 377 个项目(多项选择题)的抽样测试。采用描述性统计、方差分析和简单线性回归分析了难度和区分度指数:测试项目的平均难度指数介于 0.39 和 0.46 之间。儿童与青少年健康、妇女健康和成人健康领域的项目难度最大,而管理、心理健康和公共卫生领域的项目难度最小。歧视指数在 0.35 至 0.43 之间。在趋势分析中,不同申请年级之间的歧视指数存在差异(p < 0.001),歧视指数显著上升(p < 0.001)。与最初几年的学生相比,最后几年的学生显示出较低的难度和区分度,这表明测试较为简单,最后几年学生之间的成绩分散程度较小:结论:题目不难,区分度较好。结论:测验项目不难,区分度高,测验项目的区分度指数呈逐年上升趋势。这项研究为知识测评项目的心理测量分析和质量保证提供了有用的信息,既有助于类似的教学经验的实施,也有助于将选择题用于其他知识测评目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of qualified items for nursing education assessment: The progress testing experience

Aim

To analyze the psychometric characteristics of items in the nursing inter-institutional progress testing for the years 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023.

Background

Progress testing is a validated method for evaluating professional undergraduate education, aimed at identifying knowledge gain in a continuous and progressive manner, with potential benefits for nursing education. However, for its results to be useful, the evaluation items used in the test must have good psychometric performance.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Methods

A sample of 377 items (multiple-choice questions) was applied to 4678 students in four years of progress testing. The difficulty and discrimination indexes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA and simple linear regression.

Results

The average difficulty index of the test items ranged between 0.39 and 0.46. The areas of child and adolescent health, women's health and adult health had the most difficult items, while the areas of management, mental health and public health had the least difficult items. Discrimination index ranged from 0.35 to 0.43. There was a difference between discrimination index between the years of application (p < 0.001), with a significant increase in the discrimination index (p < 0.001) in the trend analysis. Students in the final years showed lower levels of difficulty and discrimination when compared with students in the initial years, demonstrating that the test is easier and there is less dispersion of performance among students in the final years.

Conclusions

The items are not difficult and have good discrimination. A gradual annual increase in the discrimination index of the items was observed. This study provides useful information for the psychometric analysis and quality assurance of knowledge assessment items, both for the implementation of similar PT experiences and in the use of multiple-choice questions for other knowledge assessment purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of high versus mixed-level fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students: A randomised controlled trial Effectiveness of an e-book in enhancing knowledge, coping behaviors and preventive strategies for sexual harassment prevention among new nurses: A randomized controlled study Features influencing surface acting of different clusters of nursing students in vocational college based on interpretable machine learning: A cross-sectional study Impact of a mindful self-compassion workshop incorporating sandtray on burnout in undergraduate nursing students: A mixed methods, pre-post study Professional identity development of advanced practice nurses: Evaluating its integration in curricula and relevance for professional practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1