Thomas Wilson, Martin Checklin, Nadine Lawson, Alissa J Burnett, Theresa Lombardo, Amy Freeman-Sanderson
{"title":"了解用于灵活内窥镜吞咽评估(FEES)的咽残留物评分量表的用户体验和规范数据:范围综述。","authors":"Thomas Wilson, Martin Checklin, Nadine Lawson, Alissa J Burnett, Theresa Lombardo, Amy Freeman-Sanderson","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2024.2420606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pharyngeal residue rating scales are often used to rate pharyngeal residue observed during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Despite the widespread use of pharyngeal residue rating scales, there is no data that has systematically explored user experience. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate specific reporting of user experience, user centred design principles, and normative data in the development of pharyngeal residue rating scales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted across four electronic databases inclusive of all dates until June 2024. Grey literature searching occurred in March-April 2023 and was repeated in June 2024. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol. Titles/abstracts, full texts, and data extraction were reviewed by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 22 sources were included, with 18 unique pharyngeal residue rating scales identified. Two studies referred to user experience, seven included at least one user centred design principle, and four studies reported on normative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this review highlight few pharyngeal residue rating scales include the experience of the intended user and establish normative data in the initial development phase. User experience, user centred design principles, and normative data may be useful considerations to optimise functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding user experience and normative data in pharyngeal residue rating scales used in flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Wilson, Martin Checklin, Nadine Lawson, Alissa J Burnett, Theresa Lombardo, Amy Freeman-Sanderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17549507.2024.2420606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pharyngeal residue rating scales are often used to rate pharyngeal residue observed during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Despite the widespread use of pharyngeal residue rating scales, there is no data that has systematically explored user experience. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate specific reporting of user experience, user centred design principles, and normative data in the development of pharyngeal residue rating scales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted across four electronic databases inclusive of all dates until June 2024. Grey literature searching occurred in March-April 2023 and was repeated in June 2024. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol. Titles/abstracts, full texts, and data extraction were reviewed by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 22 sources were included, with 18 unique pharyngeal residue rating scales identified. Two studies referred to user experience, seven included at least one user centred design principle, and four studies reported on normative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this review highlight few pharyngeal residue rating scales include the experience of the intended user and establish normative data in the initial development phase. User experience, user centred design principles, and normative data may be useful considerations to optimise functionality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2420606\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2420606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:咽残留物评分量表通常用于对柔性内窥镜吞咽评估过程中观察到的咽残留物进行评分。尽管咽残留物评分量表已被广泛使用,但目前还没有系统探讨用户体验的数据。本次范围审查旨在调查用户体验的具体报告、以用户为中心的设计原则以及咽残留物评级量表开发过程中的规范数据:方法:在四个电子数据库中进行了范围界定审查,包括截至 2024 年 6 月的所有日期。2023 年 3-4 月进行了灰色文献检索,2024 年 6 月再次进行了灰色文献检索。本次综述遵循了《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)协议。标题/摘要、全文和数据提取均由两名独立审稿人审查:结果:共纳入了 22 项资料来源,确定了 18 个独特的咽残留物评分量表。两项研究提到了用户体验,七项研究包含至少一项以用户为中心的设计原则,四项研究报告了标准数据:结论:本综述的研究结果表明,很少有咽部残留物评分量表在最初的开发阶段包含预期用户的体验并建立标准数据。用户体验、以用户为中心的设计原则和标准数据可能是优化功能的有用考虑因素。
Understanding user experience and normative data in pharyngeal residue rating scales used in flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): A scoping review.
Purpose: Pharyngeal residue rating scales are often used to rate pharyngeal residue observed during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Despite the widespread use of pharyngeal residue rating scales, there is no data that has systematically explored user experience. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate specific reporting of user experience, user centred design principles, and normative data in the development of pharyngeal residue rating scales.
Method: A scoping review was conducted across four electronic databases inclusive of all dates until June 2024. Grey literature searching occurred in March-April 2023 and was repeated in June 2024. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol. Titles/abstracts, full texts, and data extraction were reviewed by two independent reviewers.
Result: A total of 22 sources were included, with 18 unique pharyngeal residue rating scales identified. Two studies referred to user experience, seven included at least one user centred design principle, and four studies reported on normative data.
Conclusion: The findings of this review highlight few pharyngeal residue rating scales include the experience of the intended user and establish normative data in the initial development phase. User experience, user centred design principles, and normative data may be useful considerations to optimise functionality.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.