癫痫患者视网膜神经轴突缺失情况下的视敏度。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2024.10.019
Luisa Delazer , Joachim Havla , Soheyl Noachtar , Elisabeth Kaufmann
{"title":"癫痫患者视网膜神经轴突缺失情况下的视敏度。","authors":"Luisa Delazer ,&nbsp;Joachim Havla ,&nbsp;Soheyl Noachtar ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Kaufmann","doi":"10.1016/j.seizure.2024.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Recent studies reported a significant retinal neuroaxonal loss in people with epilepsy (PWE). However, the impact of these structural alterations on visual function, i.e., visual acuity is yet unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective cohort study, 70 PWE and 76 healthy controls (HC), all aged 18–55 years, underwent an assessment of visual acuity with 100 % high contrast (HCVA) and 2.5 % low contrast (LCVA) Sloan letter charts. Thickness of the global peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (G-pRNFL) and volume of the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIP) were assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). For the statistical analyses, the epilepsy group was subdivided into PWE with sodium channel blocking (SCB)-drug intake (<em>n</em> = 52) and PWE without SCB-drug intake (<em>n</em> = 18), since an effect of SCB-drugs on visual perception has been reported previously.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall PWE cohort presented significantly lower structural retinal measures, i.e., G-pRNFL thickness (97.57 ± 9.06 µm) and GCIP volume (1.99 ± 0.13 mm<sup>3</sup>) than HC (101.31 ± 8.28 µm, <em>p</em> = .01; 2.10 ± 0.15 mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Subgroup analyses revealed that PWE who were treated with SCB-drugs had a significantly reduced G-pRNFL thickness (96.61 ± 9.70 µm, <em>p</em> = .01) and GCIP volume (1.98 ± 0.14mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) compared to HC, while PWE without SCB-drugs (100.36 ± 6.32 µm, 2.01 ± 0.13 mm<sup>3</sup>) did not differ from HC or PWE with SCB-drugs. In visual acuity tests (HCVA and LCVA), the overall PWE cohort (52.28 ± 8.56; 31.71 ± 8.49) scored significantly lower than HC (56.57 ± 4.74, <em>p</em> = .001; 35.13 ± 5.50, <em>p</em> = .04). In subgroup analyses only PWE with SCB-drugs presented significantly lower HCVA (51.25 ± 9.35, <em>p</em> = .003) and LCVA (30.04 ± 8.93, <em>p</em> = .03) scores compared to HC, while visual acuity scores did not differ between PWE without SCB-drugs (55.25 ± 4.75, 36.53 ± 4.50) and HC. PWE with SCB-drugs had significantly lower LCVA scores than PWE without SCB-drugs (<em>p</em> = .03). Importantly, no association was found between visual acuity scores and structural parameters, neither in the overall sample, nor in any of the subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Retinal neuroaxonal loss in PWE was not associated with reduced visual acuity under high and low contrast. Instead, our findings reinforce SCB-drug intake as an important factor for reduced visual acuity under high and low contrast.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49552,"journal":{"name":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","volume":"123 ","pages":"Pages 116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual acuity in the context of retinal neuroaxonal loss in people with epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Delazer ,&nbsp;Joachim Havla ,&nbsp;Soheyl Noachtar ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Kaufmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seizure.2024.10.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Recent studies reported a significant retinal neuroaxonal loss in people with epilepsy (PWE). However, the impact of these structural alterations on visual function, i.e., visual acuity is yet unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective cohort study, 70 PWE and 76 healthy controls (HC), all aged 18–55 years, underwent an assessment of visual acuity with 100 % high contrast (HCVA) and 2.5 % low contrast (LCVA) Sloan letter charts. Thickness of the global peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (G-pRNFL) and volume of the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIP) were assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). For the statistical analyses, the epilepsy group was subdivided into PWE with sodium channel blocking (SCB)-drug intake (<em>n</em> = 52) and PWE without SCB-drug intake (<em>n</em> = 18), since an effect of SCB-drugs on visual perception has been reported previously.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall PWE cohort presented significantly lower structural retinal measures, i.e., G-pRNFL thickness (97.57 ± 9.06 µm) and GCIP volume (1.99 ± 0.13 mm<sup>3</sup>) than HC (101.31 ± 8.28 µm, <em>p</em> = .01; 2.10 ± 0.15 mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Subgroup analyses revealed that PWE who were treated with SCB-drugs had a significantly reduced G-pRNFL thickness (96.61 ± 9.70 µm, <em>p</em> = .01) and GCIP volume (1.98 ± 0.14mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) compared to HC, while PWE without SCB-drugs (100.36 ± 6.32 µm, 2.01 ± 0.13 mm<sup>3</sup>) did not differ from HC or PWE with SCB-drugs. In visual acuity tests (HCVA and LCVA), the overall PWE cohort (52.28 ± 8.56; 31.71 ± 8.49) scored significantly lower than HC (56.57 ± 4.74, <em>p</em> = .001; 35.13 ± 5.50, <em>p</em> = .04). In subgroup analyses only PWE with SCB-drugs presented significantly lower HCVA (51.25 ± 9.35, <em>p</em> = .003) and LCVA (30.04 ± 8.93, <em>p</em> = .03) scores compared to HC, while visual acuity scores did not differ between PWE without SCB-drugs (55.25 ± 4.75, 36.53 ± 4.50) and HC. PWE with SCB-drugs had significantly lower LCVA scores than PWE without SCB-drugs (<em>p</em> = .03). Importantly, no association was found between visual acuity scores and structural parameters, neither in the overall sample, nor in any of the subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Retinal neuroaxonal loss in PWE was not associated with reduced visual acuity under high and low contrast. Instead, our findings reinforce SCB-drug intake as an important factor for reduced visual acuity under high and low contrast.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 116-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131124003108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131124003108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的研究报告显示,癫痫患者(PWE)视网膜神经轴突明显缺失。然而,这些结构改变对视觉功能(即视力)的影响尚不清楚:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,年龄均在 18-55 岁之间的 70 名癫痫患者和 76 名健康对照者(HC)接受了 100 % 高对比度(HCVA)和 2.5 % 低对比度(LCVA)斯隆字母图视力评估。用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估了全周视网膜神经纤维层(G-pRNFL)的厚度和神经节细胞内丛状层(GCIP)的体积。为了进行统计分析,癫痫组被细分为服用钠通道阻滞药物(SCB)的癫痫患者(n = 52)和未服用钠通道阻滞药物的癫痫患者(n = 18),因为之前已有报道称钠离子通道阻滞药物会影响视觉感知:结果:与 HC(101.31 ± 8.28 µm,p = .01;2.10 ± 0.15 mm3,p < .001)相比,PWE 整体队列的视网膜结构指标,即 G-pRNFL 厚度(97.57 ± 9.06 µm)和 GCIP 体积(1.99 ± 0.13 mm3)明显较低。亚组分析显示,与 HC 相比,接受 SCB 药物治疗的 PWE 的 G-pRNFL 厚度(96.61 ± 9.70 µm,p = .01)和 GCIP 体积(1.98 ± 0.14 mm3,p < .001)显著减少,而未接受 SCB 药物治疗的 PWE(100.36 ± 6.32 µm,2.01 ± 0.13 mm3)与 HC 或接受 SCB 药物治疗的 PWE 没有差异。在视力测试(HCVA 和 LCVA)中,PWE 群体的总体得分(52.28 ± 8.56;31.71 ± 8.49)明显低于 HC(56.57 ± 4.74,p = .001;35.13 ± 5.50,p = .04)。在亚组分析中,只有使用 SCB 药物的 PWE 的 HCVA(51.25 ± 9.35,p = .003)和 LCVA(30.04 ± 8.93,p = .03)得分明显低于 HC,而未使用 SCB 药物的 PWE(55.25 ± 4.75,36.53 ± 4.50)和 HC 的视力得分没有差异。使用 SCB 药物的 PWE 的 LCVA 分数明显低于未使用 SCB 药物的 PWE(p = 0.03)。重要的是,无论是在总体样本中,还是在任何亚组中,均未发现视力评分与结构参数之间存在关联:意义:PWE 患者视网膜神经轴突缺失与高低对比度下视力下降无关。相反,我们的研究结果强化了SCB药物摄入量是导致高、低对比度下视力下降的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Visual acuity in the context of retinal neuroaxonal loss in people with epilepsy

Objective

Recent studies reported a significant retinal neuroaxonal loss in people with epilepsy (PWE). However, the impact of these structural alterations on visual function, i.e., visual acuity is yet unknown.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, 70 PWE and 76 healthy controls (HC), all aged 18–55 years, underwent an assessment of visual acuity with 100 % high contrast (HCVA) and 2.5 % low contrast (LCVA) Sloan letter charts. Thickness of the global peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (G-pRNFL) and volume of the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIP) were assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). For the statistical analyses, the epilepsy group was subdivided into PWE with sodium channel blocking (SCB)-drug intake (n = 52) and PWE without SCB-drug intake (n = 18), since an effect of SCB-drugs on visual perception has been reported previously.

Results

The overall PWE cohort presented significantly lower structural retinal measures, i.e., G-pRNFL thickness (97.57 ± 9.06 µm) and GCIP volume (1.99 ± 0.13 mm3) than HC (101.31 ± 8.28 µm, p = .01; 2.10 ± 0.15 mm3, p < .001). Subgroup analyses revealed that PWE who were treated with SCB-drugs had a significantly reduced G-pRNFL thickness (96.61 ± 9.70 µm, p = .01) and GCIP volume (1.98 ± 0.14mm3, p < .001) compared to HC, while PWE without SCB-drugs (100.36 ± 6.32 µm, 2.01 ± 0.13 mm3) did not differ from HC or PWE with SCB-drugs. In visual acuity tests (HCVA and LCVA), the overall PWE cohort (52.28 ± 8.56; 31.71 ± 8.49) scored significantly lower than HC (56.57 ± 4.74, p = .001; 35.13 ± 5.50, p = .04). In subgroup analyses only PWE with SCB-drugs presented significantly lower HCVA (51.25 ± 9.35, p = .003) and LCVA (30.04 ± 8.93, p = .03) scores compared to HC, while visual acuity scores did not differ between PWE without SCB-drugs (55.25 ± 4.75, 36.53 ± 4.50) and HC. PWE with SCB-drugs had significantly lower LCVA scores than PWE without SCB-drugs (p = .03). Importantly, no association was found between visual acuity scores and structural parameters, neither in the overall sample, nor in any of the subgroups.

Significance

Retinal neuroaxonal loss in PWE was not associated with reduced visual acuity under high and low contrast. Instead, our findings reinforce SCB-drug intake as an important factor for reduced visual acuity under high and low contrast.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
231
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Seizure - European Journal of Epilepsy is an international journal owned by Epilepsy Action (the largest member led epilepsy organisation in the UK). It provides a forum for papers on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders.
期刊最新文献
Parent-Reported mental health in nearest age siblings of children with Dravet Syndrome in Sweden Visual acuity in the context of retinal neuroaxonal loss in people with epilepsy Ictal tachycardia in children with epilepsy Critical care EEG monitoring in children with abusive head trauma: A retrospective study of seizure burden and predictors of neurological outcomes Epilepsy-surgery for fronto-basal lesions: Management, outcome, and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1