传统放射治疗和脉冲低剂量率放射治疗后的毒性评估:体内动物研究。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z
Noha Roshdy Salem, Ahmed Eldib, E M El-Sayed, Ehab Mostafa, Omar S Desouky
{"title":"传统放射治疗和脉冲低剂量率放射治疗后的毒性评估:体内动物研究。","authors":"Noha Roshdy Salem, Ahmed Eldib, E M El-Sayed, Ehab Mostafa, Omar S Desouky","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) is a new radiation delivery method, in which the fractional dose is divided into sub-fractional doses with periodical time breaks in between. The goal of our study is to assess the toxicity on healthy tissues resulting from PLDR as compared to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) using the same physical X-ray dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the weight and survival time for CRT and PLDR groups and studied the inflammatory cytokine transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), usually released following irradiation. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for intestinal and bone marrow tissues from rats subjected to 8 Gy whole- body irradiation using CRT and PLDR techniques. We investigated genotoxicity by performing a comet assay (CA) in splenic tissues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings showed an improvement in survival time with PLDR versus CRT by 82%.The mean survival time for CRT rats' group was 6.3 days, while it was 35.9 days for PLDR group.The weight of CRT group decreased gradually by 3.7%, while weight of PLDR group increased gradually by 2.4%.CRT resulted in more cellular atrophy in bone marrow and intestinal tissues than in PLDR treatments as shown by hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis. In addition, the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression in bone marrow and intestinal tissues of CRT was higher than those expressed in tissues from PLDR as demonstrated by the Immuno reactive score (IRS). It was10(0.53) and 9.8(0.55) for BM and intestinal tissues, respectively from CRT group and 5.8(0.63) for PLDR for both tissues. The measured CA parameters were larger with CRT compared to PLDR, where the Tail Length (TL), Tail DNA % (TD%) and Tail Moment (TM) measurements were 25.4(3.4), 56.5(7.6) % and 20.5(3.5) for CRT, 7.3(1.9), 30.0(7.2) % and 5.7(1.8) for PLDR, with P value 0.000064, 0.0004 and 0.00017, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that PLDR can reduce the toxicity on normal tissues compared to CRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicity assessment following conventional radiation therapy and pulsed low dose rate radiation therapy: an in vivo animal study.\",\"authors\":\"Noha Roshdy Salem, Ahmed Eldib, E M El-Sayed, Ehab Mostafa, Omar S Desouky\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) is a new radiation delivery method, in which the fractional dose is divided into sub-fractional doses with periodical time breaks in between. The goal of our study is to assess the toxicity on healthy tissues resulting from PLDR as compared to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) using the same physical X-ray dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the weight and survival time for CRT and PLDR groups and studied the inflammatory cytokine transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), usually released following irradiation. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for intestinal and bone marrow tissues from rats subjected to 8 Gy whole- body irradiation using CRT and PLDR techniques. We investigated genotoxicity by performing a comet assay (CA) in splenic tissues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings showed an improvement in survival time with PLDR versus CRT by 82%.The mean survival time for CRT rats' group was 6.3 days, while it was 35.9 days for PLDR group.The weight of CRT group decreased gradually by 3.7%, while weight of PLDR group increased gradually by 2.4%.CRT resulted in more cellular atrophy in bone marrow and intestinal tissues than in PLDR treatments as shown by hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis. In addition, the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression in bone marrow and intestinal tissues of CRT was higher than those expressed in tissues from PLDR as demonstrated by the Immuno reactive score (IRS). It was10(0.53) and 9.8(0.55) for BM and intestinal tissues, respectively from CRT group and 5.8(0.63) for PLDR for both tissues. The measured CA parameters were larger with CRT compared to PLDR, where the Tail Length (TL), Tail DNA % (TD%) and Tail Moment (TM) measurements were 25.4(3.4), 56.5(7.6) % and 20.5(3.5) for CRT, 7.3(1.9), 30.0(7.2) % and 5.7(1.8) for PLDR, with P value 0.000064, 0.0004 and 0.00017, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that PLDR can reduce the toxicity on normal tissues compared to CRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02545-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脉冲低剂量率放疗(PLDR)是一种新的放射治疗方法,它将小剂量分成亚小剂量,中间有一定的时间间隔。我们的研究目标是评估在相同物理 X 射线剂量下,脉冲低剂量率放疗与传统放疗(CRT)相比对健康组织造成的毒性:我们分析了 CRT 组和 PLDR 组的体重和存活时间,并研究了通常在照射后释放的炎症细胞因子转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)。使用 CRT 和 PLDR 技术对接受 8 Gy 全身辐照的大鼠的肠道和骨髓组织进行了组织病理学和免疫组化分析。我们通过对脾脏组织进行彗星试验(CA)来研究遗传毒性:CRT组大鼠的体重逐渐下降了3.7%,而PLDR组大鼠的体重逐渐增加了2.4%,苏木精和伊红染色分析表明,CRT导致骨髓和肠道组织细胞萎缩的程度高于PLDR。此外,免疫反应评分(IRS)显示,CRT 治疗组骨髓和肠道组织中转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)的表达高于 PLDR 治疗组。CRT组骨髓和肠道组织的IRS分别为10(0.53)和9.8(0.55),而PLDR组两种组织的IRS均为5.8(0.63)。与PLDR相比,CRT测量的CA参数更大,其中CRT的尾长(TL)、尾DNA%(TD%)和尾矩(TM)测量值分别为25.4(3.4)、56.5(7.6)%和20.5(3.5),PLDR的尾长(TL)、尾DNA%(TD%)和尾矩(TM)测量值分别为7.3(1.9)、30.0(7.2)%和5.7(1.8),P值分别为0.000064、0.0004和0.00017:本研究表明,与 CRT 相比,PLDR 可降低对正常组织的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toxicity assessment following conventional radiation therapy and pulsed low dose rate radiation therapy: an in vivo animal study.

Background: Pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) is a new radiation delivery method, in which the fractional dose is divided into sub-fractional doses with periodical time breaks in between. The goal of our study is to assess the toxicity on healthy tissues resulting from PLDR as compared to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) using the same physical X-ray dose.

Methods: We analyzed the weight and survival time for CRT and PLDR groups and studied the inflammatory cytokine transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), usually released following irradiation. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for intestinal and bone marrow tissues from rats subjected to 8 Gy whole- body irradiation using CRT and PLDR techniques. We investigated genotoxicity by performing a comet assay (CA) in splenic tissues.

Results: Our findings showed an improvement in survival time with PLDR versus CRT by 82%.The mean survival time for CRT rats' group was 6.3 days, while it was 35.9 days for PLDR group.The weight of CRT group decreased gradually by 3.7%, while weight of PLDR group increased gradually by 2.4%.CRT resulted in more cellular atrophy in bone marrow and intestinal tissues than in PLDR treatments as shown by hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis. In addition, the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression in bone marrow and intestinal tissues of CRT was higher than those expressed in tissues from PLDR as demonstrated by the Immuno reactive score (IRS). It was10(0.53) and 9.8(0.55) for BM and intestinal tissues, respectively from CRT group and 5.8(0.63) for PLDR for both tissues. The measured CA parameters were larger with CRT compared to PLDR, where the Tail Length (TL), Tail DNA % (TD%) and Tail Moment (TM) measurements were 25.4(3.4), 56.5(7.6) % and 20.5(3.5) for CRT, 7.3(1.9), 30.0(7.2) % and 5.7(1.8) for PLDR, with P value 0.000064, 0.0004 and 0.00017, respectively.

Conclusion: This study indicates that PLDR can reduce the toxicity on normal tissues compared to CRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of radiation-related lymphocyte recovery on the prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective analysis. Correction: Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas. Deep learning-based synthetic CT for dosimetric monitoring of combined conventional radiotherapy and lattice boost in large lung tumors. Correction: The significance of risk stratification through nomogram-based assessment in determining postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with pT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer. Sequential or simultaneous-integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer patients: trade-offs between skin toxicity and risk of compromised coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1