在安宁疗护多学科团队会议期间启动预后谈话:对话分析研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1177/08258597241286347
Andrea Bruun, Nicola White, Linda Oostendorp, Patrick Stone, Steven Bloch
{"title":"在安宁疗护多学科团队会议期间启动预后谈话:对话分析研究。","authors":"Andrea Bruun, Nicola White, Linda Oostendorp, Patrick Stone, Steven Bloch","doi":"10.1177/08258597241286347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Guidelines recommend that patients' prognoses should be discussed by the palliative care multidisciplinary team. However, there is a lack of evidence on how multidisciplinary teams carry out prognostic discussions, and especially how prognostic talk is initiated during team meetings. This study explored how prognostic talk is initiated and responded to during meetings of a hospice multidisciplinary team. <b>Methods:</b> Video-recordings of 24 inpatient multidisciplinary team meetings in a UK hospice were collected from May to December 2021. A total of 65 multidisciplinary team members participated in the meetings. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using Conversation Analysis. <b>Results:</b> Prognostic talk was initiated during multidisciplinary team members' patient case presentations. Case presentations followed a certain template, and prognoses could be initiated as responses to template items such as the patient's Phase of Illness and Karnofsky's Performance Status score and the patient's main diagnosis and issues. Prognoses also occurred as accounts for a lack of template item responses. Beyond the patient case presentation, prognostic talk was initiated in relation to discharge planning. Prognoses appeared with sequences of assessments that accounted for them. When a prognosis was provided, it received confirming minimal responses from other team members. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients' prognoses were embedded into other care discussions during meetings of a hospice multidisciplinary team. These findings can be used to inform the development of clinical guidelines and interventions aiming at improving multidisciplinary team discussions around prognosis in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initiating Prognostic Talk During Hospice Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Bruun, Nicola White, Linda Oostendorp, Patrick Stone, Steven Bloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08258597241286347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Guidelines recommend that patients' prognoses should be discussed by the palliative care multidisciplinary team. However, there is a lack of evidence on how multidisciplinary teams carry out prognostic discussions, and especially how prognostic talk is initiated during team meetings. This study explored how prognostic talk is initiated and responded to during meetings of a hospice multidisciplinary team. <b>Methods:</b> Video-recordings of 24 inpatient multidisciplinary team meetings in a UK hospice were collected from May to December 2021. A total of 65 multidisciplinary team members participated in the meetings. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using Conversation Analysis. <b>Results:</b> Prognostic talk was initiated during multidisciplinary team members' patient case presentations. Case presentations followed a certain template, and prognoses could be initiated as responses to template items such as the patient's Phase of Illness and Karnofsky's Performance Status score and the patient's main diagnosis and issues. Prognoses also occurred as accounts for a lack of template item responses. Beyond the patient case presentation, prognostic talk was initiated in relation to discharge planning. Prognoses appeared with sequences of assessments that accounted for them. When a prognosis was provided, it received confirming minimal responses from other team members. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients' prognoses were embedded into other care discussions during meetings of a hospice multidisciplinary team. These findings can be used to inform the development of clinical guidelines and interventions aiming at improving multidisciplinary team discussions around prognosis in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241286347\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241286347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:指南建议病人的预后应由姑息关怀多学科团队进行讨论。然而,关于多学科团队如何开展预后讨论,尤其是在团队会议期间如何启动预后讨论,目前还缺乏相关证据。本研究探讨了在安宁疗护多学科团队会议期间如何启动预后讨论并做出回应。研究方法从 2021 年 5 月到 12 月,收集了英国一家安宁疗护机构 24 次住院患者多学科团队会议的视频记录。共有 65 名多学科团队成员参加了会议。采用会话分析法对记录进行转录和分析。结果预后谈话是在多学科团队成员介绍病人病例时开始的。病例陈述遵循一定的模板,预后可作为对模板项目的回应,如患者的疾病阶段和卡诺夫斯基表现状态评分以及患者的主要诊断和问题。预后也可作为缺乏模板项目回答的原因。除了病人的病例介绍外,预后谈话还与出院计划有关。预后的出现与评估序列有关。当提供预后时,团队其他成员的回应也是微乎其微。结论在安宁疗护多学科团队会议期间,病人的预后被纳入了其他护理讨论中。这些研究结果可用于制定临床指南和干预措施,以改善未来多学科团队围绕预后进行的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Initiating Prognostic Talk During Hospice Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study.

Objective: Guidelines recommend that patients' prognoses should be discussed by the palliative care multidisciplinary team. However, there is a lack of evidence on how multidisciplinary teams carry out prognostic discussions, and especially how prognostic talk is initiated during team meetings. This study explored how prognostic talk is initiated and responded to during meetings of a hospice multidisciplinary team. Methods: Video-recordings of 24 inpatient multidisciplinary team meetings in a UK hospice were collected from May to December 2021. A total of 65 multidisciplinary team members participated in the meetings. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using Conversation Analysis. Results: Prognostic talk was initiated during multidisciplinary team members' patient case presentations. Case presentations followed a certain template, and prognoses could be initiated as responses to template items such as the patient's Phase of Illness and Karnofsky's Performance Status score and the patient's main diagnosis and issues. Prognoses also occurred as accounts for a lack of template item responses. Beyond the patient case presentation, prognostic talk was initiated in relation to discharge planning. Prognoses appeared with sequences of assessments that accounted for them. When a prognosis was provided, it received confirming minimal responses from other team members. Conclusions: Patients' prognoses were embedded into other care discussions during meetings of a hospice multidisciplinary team. These findings can be used to inform the development of clinical guidelines and interventions aiming at improving multidisciplinary team discussions around prognosis in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
期刊最新文献
Initiating Prognostic Talk During Hospice Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study. Palliative Homecare in Chronic Liver Disease: A Cohort Analysis of Factors and Outcomes Associated with Home Palliative Care in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease. Effect of Auricular Acupressure in Management of Constipation in Palliative Care Patients. Cocreating Meaning Through Expressive Writing and Reading for Cancer Caregivers. The Italian McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQoL-R): Psychometrics in Neurological and Neoplastic Populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1