慢性肝病患者的居家姑息治疗:晚期肝病患者居家姑息护理相关因素和结果的队列分析》(A Cohort Analysis of Factors and Outcomes Associated with Home Palliative Care in End-Stage Liver Disease)。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1177/08258597241296116
Hugo M Oliveira, Céu Rocha, Maria Francisca Rego, Rui Nunes
{"title":"慢性肝病患者的居家姑息治疗:晚期肝病患者居家姑息护理相关因素和结果的队列分析》(A Cohort Analysis of Factors and Outcomes Associated with Home Palliative Care in End-Stage Liver Disease)。","authors":"Hugo M Oliveira, Céu Rocha, Maria Francisca Rego, Rui Nunes","doi":"10.1177/08258597241296116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden, integration of palliative care in ESLD is reduced, and the majority of patients continue to die in inpatient care. We aim to assess predictors and outcomes of home palliative care, as well as factors associated with death at home in patients with ESLD. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study of patients with ESLD, followed by a palliative care team between 2017 and 2022. Information regarding patient demographics, ESLD etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests were used to identify factors associated with home palliative care. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed 75 patients: 44% had home palliative care and 33% died at home. ESLD patients with home palliative care were older (72.52 vs 64.45; <i>p</i> = 0.002), had a longer palliative care intervention time (149.97 ± 196.23 vs 43.69 ± 100.60 days; <i>p</i> = 0.007), higher rates of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 11.024; <i>p</i> = 0.029), and hepatocarcinoma (90.9% vs 64.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.007). Patients with home palliative care had a reduction in-hospital admissions (2.61 vs 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.000) and a greater probability of death at home (66.7% vs 33.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.000). Patients who died at home (33.3%) were older (72.20 vs 64.40; <i>p</i> = 0.000) and had longer palliative care intervention time (178.80 ± 211.78 vs 46.28 ± 99.67 days; <i>p</i> = 0.006). <b>Conclusion:</b> Home palliative care in ESLD differs based on demographics and disease complications, with a positive impact of homecare translated into a reduction in hospital admissions and an increased probability of death at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"8258597241296116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Homecare in Chronic Liver Disease: A Cohort Analysis of Factors and Outcomes Associated with Home Palliative Care in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Hugo M Oliveira, Céu Rocha, Maria Francisca Rego, Rui Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08258597241296116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden, integration of palliative care in ESLD is reduced, and the majority of patients continue to die in inpatient care. We aim to assess predictors and outcomes of home palliative care, as well as factors associated with death at home in patients with ESLD. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study of patients with ESLD, followed by a palliative care team between 2017 and 2022. Information regarding patient demographics, ESLD etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests were used to identify factors associated with home palliative care. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed 75 patients: 44% had home palliative care and 33% died at home. ESLD patients with home palliative care were older (72.52 vs 64.45; <i>p</i> = 0.002), had a longer palliative care intervention time (149.97 ± 196.23 vs 43.69 ± 100.60 days; <i>p</i> = 0.007), higher rates of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 11.024; <i>p</i> = 0.029), and hepatocarcinoma (90.9% vs 64.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.007). Patients with home palliative care had a reduction in-hospital admissions (2.61 vs 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.000) and a greater probability of death at home (66.7% vs 33.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.000). Patients who died at home (33.3%) were older (72.20 vs 64.40; <i>p</i> = 0.000) and had longer palliative care intervention time (178.80 ± 211.78 vs 46.28 ± 99.67 days; <i>p</i> = 0.006). <b>Conclusion:</b> Home palliative care in ESLD differs based on demographics and disease complications, with a positive impact of homecare translated into a reduction in hospital admissions and an increased probability of death at home.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8258597241296116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241296116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241296116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:慢性肝病的发病率和死亡率大幅上升。在终末期肝病(ESLD)中,患者的生存期约为 2 年。尽管 ESLD 预后不佳且症状负担较重,但姑息治疗的整合程度却很低,大多数患者仍死于住院治疗。我们旨在评估居家姑息治疗的预测因素和结果,以及 ESLD 患者居家死亡的相关因素。方法:回顾性队列研究对2017年至2022年间由姑息治疗团队随访的ESLD患者进行回顾性队列研究。收集了有关患者人口统计学、ESLD 病因、失代偿和干预措施的信息。采用双侧检验来确定与家庭姑息治疗相关的因素。结果:我们对 75 名患者进行了分析:44%的患者接受了居家姑息治疗,33%的患者死于家中。接受家庭姑息治疗的 ESLD 患者年龄更大(72.52 vs 64.45;p = 0.002),姑息治疗干预时间更长(149.97 ± 196.23 vs 43.69 ± 100.60 天;p = 0.007),腹水或肝性脑病发生率更高(χ2 = 11.024;p = 0.029),肝癌发生率更高(90.9% vs 64.3%;p = 0.007)。接受居家姑息治疗的患者入院率降低(2.61 vs 1.06;p = 0.000),在家中死亡的概率增加(66.7% vs 33.3%;p = 0.000)。在家中死亡的患者(33.3%)年龄更大(72.20 对 64.40;P = 0.000),姑息治疗干预时间更长(178.80 ± 211.78 对 46.28 ± 99.67 天;P = 0.006)。结论ESLD患者的居家姑息治疗因人口统计学和疾病并发症而异,居家姑息治疗的积极影响可转化为入院次数的减少和居家死亡概率的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative Homecare in Chronic Liver Disease: A Cohort Analysis of Factors and Outcomes Associated with Home Palliative Care in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease.

Objective: The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden, integration of palliative care in ESLD is reduced, and the majority of patients continue to die in inpatient care. We aim to assess predictors and outcomes of home palliative care, as well as factors associated with death at home in patients with ESLD. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with ESLD, followed by a palliative care team between 2017 and 2022. Information regarding patient demographics, ESLD etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests were used to identify factors associated with home palliative care. Results: We analyzed 75 patients: 44% had home palliative care and 33% died at home. ESLD patients with home palliative care were older (72.52 vs 64.45; p = 0.002), had a longer palliative care intervention time (149.97 ± 196.23 vs 43.69 ± 100.60 days; p = 0.007), higher rates of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (χ2 = 11.024; p = 0.029), and hepatocarcinoma (90.9% vs 64.3%; p = 0.007). Patients with home palliative care had a reduction in-hospital admissions (2.61 vs 1.06; p = 0.000) and a greater probability of death at home (66.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.000). Patients who died at home (33.3%) were older (72.20 vs 64.40; p = 0.000) and had longer palliative care intervention time (178.80 ± 211.78 vs 46.28 ± 99.67 days; p = 0.006). Conclusion: Home palliative care in ESLD differs based on demographics and disease complications, with a positive impact of homecare translated into a reduction in hospital admissions and an increased probability of death at home.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Practice Guidelines on Palliative Sedation Around the World: A Systematic Review. Palliative Care Consultation in the Intensive Care Unit Reduces Hospital Costs: A Cost-Analysis. Caregiving Strain Mediates the Relationship Between Terminally Ill Patient's Physical Symptoms and Their Family Caregivers' Wellbeing: A Multicentered Longitudinal Study. Relatives' Unmet Needs in the Last Year of Life of Patients With Advanced Cancer: Results of a Dutch Prospective, Longitudinal Study (eQuiPe). The Impact of Palliative Care Consultation on Aggressive Medical Interventions in End-of-life Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Insights from the U.S. National Patient Sample.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1