超声引导下微创取出深部避孕植入物:结果与挑战。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-356
Juan Carlos Soler-Perromat, Jaime Isern-Kebschull, Montserrat Del Amo, Álvaro Bartolomé-Solanas, José Ríos, Cristian de Guirior, Francisco Carmona, Ana-Isabel García-Diez, Marta Porta-Vilaró, Xavier Tomás
{"title":"超声引导下微创取出深部避孕植入物:结果与挑战。","authors":"Juan Carlos Soler-Perromat, Jaime Isern-Kebschull, Montserrat Del Amo, Álvaro Bartolomé-Solanas, José Ríos, Cristian de Guirior, Francisco Carmona, Ana-Isabel García-Diez, Marta Porta-Vilaró, Xavier Tomás","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contraceptive arm implants, such as Implanon NXT<sup>®</sup>/Nexplanon<sup>®</sup>, are reversible methods of birth control that have gained global popularity, with over 20 million worldwide users. While palpable implants can be easily removed, deep or non-palpable implants pose complications during extraction, often requiring open surgery. This ultrasound-guided removal technique offers a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative, providing real-time control over the implant and neurovascular structures. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and challenges of this implant removal method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, all cases referred to our institution for ultrasound-guided removal of contraceptive implants, from June 2022 to December 2023, were reviewed. Our facility serves as a referral center for handling challenging implants. Twenty-nine women with contraceptive implants were referred for implant removal in this period of time. Thirty implants were sent for removal in total (one patient had a double implant). Data specific to the patients were collected: age and body mass index (BMI). Data specific to the implant were also collected: time since implant insertion (months), history of a previous removal attempt, type of implant (single or double rod), implant palpability, laterality of the implant, supra or subfascial location, success or failure of the ultrasound-guided removal procedure and presence of complications in the post-procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the procedure success rate and these variables, and also between these variables and the supra or subfascial location of the implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six of the 30 implants (86.67%) were successfully removed with this fully ultrasound-guided technique. In cases where the implant could not be removed, there was a higher rate of subfascial implant location (75%), while in cases where the removal was successful, the rate of subfascial implant location was significantly lower at 19.23% (P=0.048). Patients whose implants could be removed had a median BMI of 23.71 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, which was higher than the BMI of patients whose implants could not be removed (20.82 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), with a P=0.022. No complications were registered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided implant removal is effective, safe and offers a minimally-invasive alternative to open surgery. The removal of subfascial implants is also feasible but more challenging, leading to a reduction of success rate in this group. These positive outcomes suggest its potential as a standard initial approach for deep contraceptive implant removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"14 11","pages":"7791-7802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants: outcomes and challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Soler-Perromat, Jaime Isern-Kebschull, Montserrat Del Amo, Álvaro Bartolomé-Solanas, José Ríos, Cristian de Guirior, Francisco Carmona, Ana-Isabel García-Diez, Marta Porta-Vilaró, Xavier Tomás\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-24-356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contraceptive arm implants, such as Implanon NXT<sup>®</sup>/Nexplanon<sup>®</sup>, are reversible methods of birth control that have gained global popularity, with over 20 million worldwide users. While palpable implants can be easily removed, deep or non-palpable implants pose complications during extraction, often requiring open surgery. This ultrasound-guided removal technique offers a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative, providing real-time control over the implant and neurovascular structures. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and challenges of this implant removal method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, all cases referred to our institution for ultrasound-guided removal of contraceptive implants, from June 2022 to December 2023, were reviewed. Our facility serves as a referral center for handling challenging implants. Twenty-nine women with contraceptive implants were referred for implant removal in this period of time. Thirty implants were sent for removal in total (one patient had a double implant). Data specific to the patients were collected: age and body mass index (BMI). Data specific to the implant were also collected: time since implant insertion (months), history of a previous removal attempt, type of implant (single or double rod), implant palpability, laterality of the implant, supra or subfascial location, success or failure of the ultrasound-guided removal procedure and presence of complications in the post-procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the procedure success rate and these variables, and also between these variables and the supra or subfascial location of the implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six of the 30 implants (86.67%) were successfully removed with this fully ultrasound-guided technique. In cases where the implant could not be removed, there was a higher rate of subfascial implant location (75%), while in cases where the removal was successful, the rate of subfascial implant location was significantly lower at 19.23% (P=0.048). Patients whose implants could be removed had a median BMI of 23.71 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, which was higher than the BMI of patients whose implants could not be removed (20.82 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), with a P=0.022. No complications were registered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided implant removal is effective, safe and offers a minimally-invasive alternative to open surgery. The removal of subfascial implants is also feasible but more challenging, leading to a reduction of success rate in this group. These positive outcomes suggest its potential as a standard initial approach for deep contraceptive implant removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 11\",\"pages\":\"7791-7802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-356\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:避孕臂植入物(如 Implanon NXT®/Nexplanon®)是一种可逆的节育方法,在全球广受欢迎,全球用户已超过 2000 万。虽然可触及的植入物很容易取出,但深部或不可触及的植入物在取出时会造成并发症,通常需要进行开刀手术。这种超声引导下的取出技术提供了一种微创、安全、有效的替代方法,可实时控制植入物和神经血管结构。我们的研究旨在评估这种植入物取出方法的有效性和挑战性:在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们回顾了 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 12 月期间转诊到我院进行超声引导下取出避孕植入物的所有病例。我院是处理高难度植入物的转诊中心。在此期间,共有 29 名植入避孕药具的女性被转诊进行植入物取出手术。共有 30 个植入物被送去取出(其中一名患者有两个植入物)。收集了患者的具体数据:年龄和体重指数(BMI)。此外,还收集了植入物的具体数据:植入时间(月)、之前的移除尝试史、植入物类型(单棒或双棒)、植入物的可触及性、植入物的侧位、筋膜上或筋膜下位置、超声引导下移除手术的成败以及术后是否出现并发症。统计分析旨在确定手术成功率与这些变量之间的关系,以及这些变量与植入物筋膜上或筋膜下位置之间的关系:结果:在 30 个植入物中,有 26 个(86.67%)通过这种完全超声引导的技术成功取出。在无法取出植入物的病例中,筋膜下植入物位置的比例较高(75%),而在成功取出植入物的病例中,筋膜下植入物位置的比例明显较低,仅为 19.23%(P=0.048)。植入物可以取出的患者的体重指数中位数为 23.71 kg/m2,高于植入物无法取出的患者的体重指数(20.82 kg/m2),P=0.022。无并发症发生:结论:经皮实时超声引导植入物取出术有效、安全,是开放手术的微创替代方案。切除筋膜下植入物也是可行的,但更具挑战性,导致该组成功率降低。这些积极的结果表明,它有可能成为深部避孕植入物取出的标准初始方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants: outcomes and challenges.

Background: Contraceptive arm implants, such as Implanon NXT®/Nexplanon®, are reversible methods of birth control that have gained global popularity, with over 20 million worldwide users. While palpable implants can be easily removed, deep or non-palpable implants pose complications during extraction, often requiring open surgery. This ultrasound-guided removal technique offers a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative, providing real-time control over the implant and neurovascular structures. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and challenges of this implant removal method.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, all cases referred to our institution for ultrasound-guided removal of contraceptive implants, from June 2022 to December 2023, were reviewed. Our facility serves as a referral center for handling challenging implants. Twenty-nine women with contraceptive implants were referred for implant removal in this period of time. Thirty implants were sent for removal in total (one patient had a double implant). Data specific to the patients were collected: age and body mass index (BMI). Data specific to the implant were also collected: time since implant insertion (months), history of a previous removal attempt, type of implant (single or double rod), implant palpability, laterality of the implant, supra or subfascial location, success or failure of the ultrasound-guided removal procedure and presence of complications in the post-procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the procedure success rate and these variables, and also between these variables and the supra or subfascial location of the implant.

Results: Twenty-six of the 30 implants (86.67%) were successfully removed with this fully ultrasound-guided technique. In cases where the implant could not be removed, there was a higher rate of subfascial implant location (75%), while in cases where the removal was successful, the rate of subfascial implant location was significantly lower at 19.23% (P=0.048). Patients whose implants could be removed had a median BMI of 23.71 kg/m2, which was higher than the BMI of patients whose implants could not be removed (20.82 kg/m2), with a P=0.022. No complications were registered.

Conclusions: Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided implant removal is effective, safe and offers a minimally-invasive alternative to open surgery. The removal of subfascial implants is also feasible but more challenging, leading to a reduction of success rate in this group. These positive outcomes suggest its potential as a standard initial approach for deep contraceptive implant removal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Metastatic bone lesion type in gastric cancer patients: imaging findings of case reports. Minimally invasive interventional guided imaging therapies of musculoskeletal tumors. Myosteatosis: diagnostic significance and assessment by imaging approaches. Narrative review of chest wall ultrasound: a practical approach. Natural language processing-based analysis of the level of adoption by expert radiologists of the ASSR, ASNR and NASS version 2.0 of lumbar disc nomenclature: an eight-year survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1