比较 OpenPose 系统和参考光电系统对儿童下肢角度参数的步态分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104044
Roxane Henry, Sébastien Cordillet, Hélène Rauscent, Isabelle Bonan, Arnaud Huaulmé, Sylvette Marleix, Pierre Jannin, Tiphaine Casy, Philippe Violas
{"title":"比较 OpenPose 系统和参考光电系统对儿童下肢角度参数的步态分析。","authors":"Roxane Henry, Sébastien Cordillet, Hélène Rauscent, Isabelle Bonan, Arnaud Huaulmé, Sylvette Marleix, Pierre Jannin, Tiphaine Casy, Philippe Violas","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative Gait Analysis (QGA) is the gold-standard for detailed study of lower-limb movement, angles and forces, especially in pediatrics, providing a decision aid for treatment and for assessment of results. However, widespread use of QGA is hindered by the need for specific equipment and trained personnel and high costs. Recently, the OpenPose system used algorithms for 2D video movement analysis, to determine joint points and angles without any supplementary equipment or great expertise. The present study therefore aimed to validate application of OpenPose for gait analysis in children with locomotor pathology, thereby circumventing the limitations of QGA.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The OpenPose system is as precise as QGA for measuring lower-limb angles in gait in children.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Gait analysis was studied prospectively, between January and July 2023, in 20 children: 13 boys, 7 girls; mean age, 13 years. There was no selection for pathology or use of walking aids. QGA was performed, measuring joint angles in the hips, knees and ankles. The same measurements were then made using the points obtained on OpenPose. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were only slight differences in angle measurements (in degrees) for the knees: right, 0.54 [-0.61; 1.71], p = 0.361; left, -1.09 [-2.16; 0.01], p = 0.051. Differences were greater for the hips (right, 9.32 [8.28; 10.35]; left, 7.54 [6.55; 8.54], p < 0.01) and ankles (right, -6.67 [-7.22; -6.12]; left, -7.07 [-7.60; -6.54], p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>OpenPose provided angle values close to those of QGA for the knees in the sagittal plane, independently of pathology and walking aid. In the hips and ankles, on the other hand, differences were too great to allow clinical application of OpenPose.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the OpenPose system and the reference optoelectronic system for gait analysis of lower-limb angular parameters in children.\",\"authors\":\"Roxane Henry, Sébastien Cordillet, Hélène Rauscent, Isabelle Bonan, Arnaud Huaulmé, Sylvette Marleix, Pierre Jannin, Tiphaine Casy, Philippe Violas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative Gait Analysis (QGA) is the gold-standard for detailed study of lower-limb movement, angles and forces, especially in pediatrics, providing a decision aid for treatment and for assessment of results. However, widespread use of QGA is hindered by the need for specific equipment and trained personnel and high costs. Recently, the OpenPose system used algorithms for 2D video movement analysis, to determine joint points and angles without any supplementary equipment or great expertise. The present study therefore aimed to validate application of OpenPose for gait analysis in children with locomotor pathology, thereby circumventing the limitations of QGA.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The OpenPose system is as precise as QGA for measuring lower-limb angles in gait in children.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Gait analysis was studied prospectively, between January and July 2023, in 20 children: 13 boys, 7 girls; mean age, 13 years. There was no selection for pathology or use of walking aids. QGA was performed, measuring joint angles in the hips, knees and ankles. The same measurements were then made using the points obtained on OpenPose. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were only slight differences in angle measurements (in degrees) for the knees: right, 0.54 [-0.61; 1.71], p = 0.361; left, -1.09 [-2.16; 0.01], p = 0.051. Differences were greater for the hips (right, 9.32 [8.28; 10.35]; left, 7.54 [6.55; 8.54], p < 0.01) and ankles (right, -6.67 [-7.22; -6.12]; left, -7.07 [-7.60; -6.54], p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>OpenPose provided angle values close to those of QGA for the knees in the sagittal plane, independently of pathology and walking aid. In the hips and ankles, on the other hand, differences were too great to allow clinical application of OpenPose.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:步态定量分析(QGA)是详细研究下肢运动、角度和力量的黄金标准,尤其是在儿科,可为治疗和结果评估提供辅助决策。然而,由于需要特定的设备和训练有素的人员以及高昂的费用,QGA 的广泛使用受到了阻碍。最近,OpenPose 系统使用算法进行二维视频运动分析,无需任何辅助设备或丰富的专业知识即可确定关节点和角度。因此,本研究旨在验证 OpenPose 在运动病理儿童步态分析中的应用,从而规避 QGA 的局限性:假设:在测量儿童步态的下肢角度方面,OpenPose 系统与 QGA 一样精确:2023年1月至7月期间,对20名儿童的步态分析进行了前瞻性研究:13名男孩,7名女孩;平均年龄13岁。没有选择病理或使用行走辅助工具的儿童。进行了 QGA 测量,测量了髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的关节角度。然后使用在 OpenPose 上获得的点进行同样的测量。采用曼-惠特尼检验对两种方法进行比较:膝关节的角度测量值(单位:度)仅有微小差异:右侧,0.54 [-0.61 ; 1.71],p = 0.361;左侧,-1.09 [-2.16 ; 0.01],p = 0.051。臀部的差异更大(右侧,9.32 [8.28 ; 10.35];左侧,7.54 [6.55 ; 8.54],p 讨论):OpenPose 提供的膝关节矢状面角度值接近 QGA 的角度值,与病理和助行器无关。而在髋关节和踝关节方面,由于差异太大,OpenPose无法应用于临床:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the OpenPose system and the reference optoelectronic system for gait analysis of lower-limb angular parameters in children.

Introduction: Quantitative Gait Analysis (QGA) is the gold-standard for detailed study of lower-limb movement, angles and forces, especially in pediatrics, providing a decision aid for treatment and for assessment of results. However, widespread use of QGA is hindered by the need for specific equipment and trained personnel and high costs. Recently, the OpenPose system used algorithms for 2D video movement analysis, to determine joint points and angles without any supplementary equipment or great expertise. The present study therefore aimed to validate application of OpenPose for gait analysis in children with locomotor pathology, thereby circumventing the limitations of QGA.

Hypothesis: The OpenPose system is as precise as QGA for measuring lower-limb angles in gait in children.

Materials and methods: Gait analysis was studied prospectively, between January and July 2023, in 20 children: 13 boys, 7 girls; mean age, 13 years. There was no selection for pathology or use of walking aids. QGA was performed, measuring joint angles in the hips, knees and ankles. The same measurements were then made using the points obtained on OpenPose. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two methods.

Results: There were only slight differences in angle measurements (in degrees) for the knees: right, 0.54 [-0.61; 1.71], p = 0.361; left, -1.09 [-2.16; 0.01], p = 0.051. Differences were greater for the hips (right, 9.32 [8.28; 10.35]; left, 7.54 [6.55; 8.54], p < 0.01) and ankles (right, -6.67 [-7.22; -6.12]; left, -7.07 [-7.60; -6.54], p < 0.01).

Discussion: OpenPose provided angle values close to those of QGA for the knees in the sagittal plane, independently of pathology and walking aid. In the hips and ankles, on the other hand, differences were too great to allow clinical application of OpenPose.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Collection of Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (CRAM-PROMs) in orthopaedic trauma: a randomized trial to assess the impact of quantity on quality. Is pre-operative block-test with lidocaine injection efficient in predicting the functional result of revision total hip arthroplasty? Learning curve for combined reconstruction of the anterolateral and anterior cruciate ligaments: a report of 108 cases with a single surgeon. Editorial Board Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1