Alejandra Hernández Alberola, Natalia Bartolomé Nogal, Almudena Blanco Miranda, David A Lipson, Lee Tombs, MeiLan K Han
{"title":"患者性别对慢性阻塞性肺病治疗结果的影响:IMPACT 试验的事后分析。","authors":"Alejandra Hernández Alberola, Natalia Bartolomé Nogal, Almudena Blanco Miranda, David A Lipson, Lee Tombs, MeiLan K Han","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung physiology and COPD pathophysiology differ between sexes. This post hoc analysis investigated IMPACT trial outcomes by patient sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and history of exacerbations were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25μg, FF/VI 100/25μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg. Annual rate and risk of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> and SGRQ score, and safety were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,355 patients, 66.3% were male. More females reported ≥2 moderate/severe prior exacerbations (58% vs 53%) at screening versus males. Additionally, females had worse mean (SD) SGRQ scores (52.4[15.97] vs 49.8[17.24]) at baseline. FF/UMEC/VI improved annual exacerbation rate, lung function and health status for both sexes versus dual therapy. The difference in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> across time points with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI was 103-110mL in males and 70-84mL in females. On-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates remained higher for females (FF/UMEC/VI: 0.99; FF/VI: 1.19; UMEC/VI: 1.35) than males (0.87; 1.01; 1.14). Females experienced fewer exacerbations with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL (0.81[0.68,0.97], p=0.024) or <2 exacerbations in the past year (0.73[0.57,0.94],p=0.013) with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More females with COPD reported exacerbations in the prior year at screening, as well as during the study, versus males, across all treatments. FF/UMEC/VI improved exacerbation rates versus UMEC/VI in females with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL or <2 exacerbations in the prior year, suggesting inhaled corticosteroids may play an important role in exacerbation reduction for females in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Patient Sex on Treatment Outcomes in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Hernández Alberola, Natalia Bartolomé Nogal, Almudena Blanco Miranda, David A Lipson, Lee Tombs, MeiLan K Han\",\"doi\":\"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung physiology and COPD pathophysiology differ between sexes. This post hoc analysis investigated IMPACT trial outcomes by patient sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and history of exacerbations were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25μg, FF/VI 100/25μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg. Annual rate and risk of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> and SGRQ score, and safety were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,355 patients, 66.3% were male. More females reported ≥2 moderate/severe prior exacerbations (58% vs 53%) at screening versus males. Additionally, females had worse mean (SD) SGRQ scores (52.4[15.97] vs 49.8[17.24]) at baseline. FF/UMEC/VI improved annual exacerbation rate, lung function and health status for both sexes versus dual therapy. The difference in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> across time points with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI was 103-110mL in males and 70-84mL in females. On-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates remained higher for females (FF/UMEC/VI: 0.99; FF/VI: 1.19; UMEC/VI: 1.35) than males (0.87; 1.01; 1.14). Females experienced fewer exacerbations with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL (0.81[0.68,0.97], p=0.024) or <2 exacerbations in the past year (0.73[0.57,0.94],p=0.013) with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More females with COPD reported exacerbations in the prior year at screening, as well as during the study, versus males, across all treatments. FF/UMEC/VI improved exacerbation rates versus UMEC/VI in females with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL or <2 exacerbations in the prior year, suggesting inhaled corticosteroids may play an important role in exacerbation reduction for females in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Patient Sex on Treatment Outcomes in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT Trial.
Introduction: Lung physiology and COPD pathophysiology differ between sexes. This post hoc analysis investigated IMPACT trial outcomes by patient sex.
Methods: IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and history of exacerbations were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25μg, FF/VI 100/25μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg. Annual rate and risk of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough FEV1 and SGRQ score, and safety were assessed.
Results: Of 10,355 patients, 66.3% were male. More females reported ≥2 moderate/severe prior exacerbations (58% vs 53%) at screening versus males. Additionally, females had worse mean (SD) SGRQ scores (52.4[15.97] vs 49.8[17.24]) at baseline. FF/UMEC/VI improved annual exacerbation rate, lung function and health status for both sexes versus dual therapy. The difference in trough FEV1 across time points with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI was 103-110mL in males and 70-84mL in females. On-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates remained higher for females (FF/UMEC/VI: 0.99; FF/VI: 1.19; UMEC/VI: 1.35) than males (0.87; 1.01; 1.14). Females experienced fewer exacerbations with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL (0.81[0.68,0.97], p=0.024) or <2 exacerbations in the past year (0.73[0.57,0.94],p=0.013) with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.
Conclusion: More females with COPD reported exacerbations in the prior year at screening, as well as during the study, versus males, across all treatments. FF/UMEC/VI improved exacerbation rates versus UMEC/VI in females with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL or <2 exacerbations in the prior year, suggesting inhaled corticosteroids may play an important role in exacerbation reduction for females in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).