患者性别对慢性阻塞性肺病治疗结果的影响:IMPACT 试验的事后分析。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541
Alejandra Hernández Alberola, Natalia Bartolomé Nogal, Almudena Blanco Miranda, David A Lipson, Lee Tombs, MeiLan K Han
{"title":"患者性别对慢性阻塞性肺病治疗结果的影响:IMPACT 试验的事后分析。","authors":"Alejandra Hernández Alberola, Natalia Bartolomé Nogal, Almudena Blanco Miranda, David A Lipson, Lee Tombs, MeiLan K Han","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung physiology and COPD pathophysiology differ between sexes. This post hoc analysis investigated IMPACT trial outcomes by patient sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and history of exacerbations were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25μg, FF/VI 100/25μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg. Annual rate and risk of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> and SGRQ score, and safety were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,355 patients, 66.3% were male. More females reported ≥2 moderate/severe prior exacerbations (58% vs 53%) at screening versus males. Additionally, females had worse mean (SD) SGRQ scores (52.4[15.97] vs 49.8[17.24]) at baseline. FF/UMEC/VI improved annual exacerbation rate, lung function and health status for both sexes versus dual therapy. The difference in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> across time points with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI was 103-110mL in males and 70-84mL in females. On-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates remained higher for females (FF/UMEC/VI: 0.99; FF/VI: 1.19; UMEC/VI: 1.35) than males (0.87; 1.01; 1.14). Females experienced fewer exacerbations with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL (0.81[0.68,0.97], p=0.024) or <2 exacerbations in the past year (0.73[0.57,0.94],p=0.013) with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More females with COPD reported exacerbations in the prior year at screening, as well as during the study, versus males, across all treatments. FF/UMEC/VI improved exacerbation rates versus UMEC/VI in females with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL or <2 exacerbations in the prior year, suggesting inhaled corticosteroids may play an important role in exacerbation reduction for females in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Patient Sex on Treatment Outcomes in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Hernández Alberola, Natalia Bartolomé Nogal, Almudena Blanco Miranda, David A Lipson, Lee Tombs, MeiLan K Han\",\"doi\":\"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung physiology and COPD pathophysiology differ between sexes. This post hoc analysis investigated IMPACT trial outcomes by patient sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and history of exacerbations were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25μg, FF/VI 100/25μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg. Annual rate and risk of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> and SGRQ score, and safety were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,355 patients, 66.3% were male. More females reported ≥2 moderate/severe prior exacerbations (58% vs 53%) at screening versus males. Additionally, females had worse mean (SD) SGRQ scores (52.4[15.97] vs 49.8[17.24]) at baseline. FF/UMEC/VI improved annual exacerbation rate, lung function and health status for both sexes versus dual therapy. The difference in trough FEV<sub>1</sub> across time points with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI was 103-110mL in males and 70-84mL in females. On-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates remained higher for females (FF/UMEC/VI: 0.99; FF/VI: 1.19; UMEC/VI: 1.35) than males (0.87; 1.01; 1.14). Females experienced fewer exacerbations with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL (0.81[0.68,0.97], p=0.024) or <2 exacerbations in the past year (0.73[0.57,0.94],p=0.013) with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More females with COPD reported exacerbations in the prior year at screening, as well as during the study, versus males, across all treatments. FF/UMEC/VI improved exacerbation rates versus UMEC/VI in females with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL or <2 exacerbations in the prior year, suggesting inhaled corticosteroids may play an important role in exacerbation reduction for females in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介肺部生理和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的病理生理学在性别上存在差异。这项事后分析调查了按患者性别分列的 IMPACT 试验结果:IMPACT是一项为期52周的双盲试验。年龄≥40岁、有症状且有加重病史的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者按2:2:1随机分配到糠酸氟替卡松/优甲乐/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)100/62.5/25μg、FF/VI 100/25μg或UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg。对中度/重度病情恶化的年发生率和风险、谷值 FEV1 和 SGRQ 评分与基线相比的变化以及安全性进行了评估:在 10,355 名患者中,66.3% 为男性。与男性相比,更多女性在筛查时报告了≥2次中度/重度病情加重(58% vs 53%)。此外,基线时女性的平均(标清)SGRQ 评分较低(52.4[15.97] vs 49.8[17.24])。与双重疗法相比,FF/UMEC/VI 可改善男女患者的年度恶化率、肺功能和健康状况。FF/UMEC/VI与FF/VI在不同时间点的FEV1谷值差异为:男性103-110毫升,女性70-84毫升。女性治疗中度/重度恶化率(FF/UMEC/VI:0.99;FF/VI:1.19;UMEC/VI:1.35)仍高于男性(0.87;1.01;1.14)。女性嗜酸性粒细胞计数较低,病情加重的次数也较少 结论:女性慢性阻塞性肺病患者的病情加重次数较多:在所有治疗方法中,女性慢性阻塞性肺病患者在筛查时和研究期间报告的上一年病情加重的人数均多于男性。FF/UMEC/VI 与 UMEC/VI 相比,嗜酸性粒细胞计数女性患者的病情加重率有所改善
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Patient Sex on Treatment Outcomes in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT Trial.

Introduction: Lung physiology and COPD pathophysiology differ between sexes. This post hoc analysis investigated IMPACT trial outcomes by patient sex.

Methods: IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and history of exacerbations were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25μg, FF/VI 100/25μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg. Annual rate and risk of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough FEV1 and SGRQ score, and safety were assessed.

Results: Of 10,355 patients, 66.3% were male. More females reported ≥2 moderate/severe prior exacerbations (58% vs 53%) at screening versus males. Additionally, females had worse mean (SD) SGRQ scores (52.4[15.97] vs 49.8[17.24]) at baseline. FF/UMEC/VI improved annual exacerbation rate, lung function and health status for both sexes versus dual therapy. The difference in trough FEV1 across time points with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI was 103-110mL in males and 70-84mL in females. On-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates remained higher for females (FF/UMEC/VI: 0.99; FF/VI: 1.19; UMEC/VI: 1.35) than males (0.87; 1.01; 1.14). Females experienced fewer exacerbations with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL (0.81[0.68,0.97], p=0.024) or <2 exacerbations in the past year (0.73[0.57,0.94],p=0.013) with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.

Conclusion: More females with COPD reported exacerbations in the prior year at screening, as well as during the study, versus males, across all treatments. FF/UMEC/VI improved exacerbation rates versus UMEC/VI in females with eosinophil counts <150 cells/µL or <2 exacerbations in the prior year, suggesting inhaled corticosteroids may play an important role in exacerbation reduction for females in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Patient Sex on Treatment Outcomes in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT Trial. Structured Evaluation and Management of Patients with COPD in an Accredited Program. Associations of Smoking, Cytomegalovirus Serostatus, and Natural Killer Cell Phenotypes in Smokers With and At Risk for COPD. Clinical Use of an Exposure, Symptom, and Spirometry Algorithm to Stratify Smokers into COPD Risk Phenotypes: A Case Finding Study Combined with Smoking Cessation Counseling. Inhaled Corticosteroids and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1