四种工具性日常生活活动评估的预测效用与认知障碍老年人的认知状态变化。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging and Health Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1177/08982643241297193
Christine B Phillips, Ava McVey, Briana N Sprague, Kalvry Cooper, Abigail T Stephan, Lesley A Ross
{"title":"四种工具性日常生活活动评估的预测效用与认知障碍老年人的认知状态变化。","authors":"Christine B Phillips, Ava McVey, Briana N Sprague, Kalvry Cooper, Abigail T Stephan, Lesley A Ross","doi":"10.1177/08982643241297193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the factor structure and predictive utility of four instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) measures to identify cognitive status changes among older adults enrolled in the ACTIVE Trial.</p><p><strong>Major findings: </strong>Extracted factors represented IADL instruments. Baseline performance on the Everyday Problems Test (EPT) predicted 5-year MMSE scores (est. = .08, <i>p</i> < .001), adjusting for demographic and health covariates, baseline MMSE, self-reported IADL function, and the performance-based Observed Tasks of Daily Living and Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessments. For each 1-point increase in baseline EPT financial performance, the odds of cognitive impairment decreased by 26%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IADL functional domains were not interchangeable across instruments. The EPT demonstrated better predictive utility compared to other instruments for detecting subsequent cognitive decline/impairment. This is a useful step in developing effective tools to detect early functional deficits indicating subsequent clinical impairment. Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Trial (ACTIVE), NCT00298558, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00298558.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"8982643241297193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Utility of Four Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Assessments and Cognitive Status Changes Among Cognitively In-Tact Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Christine B Phillips, Ava McVey, Briana N Sprague, Kalvry Cooper, Abigail T Stephan, Lesley A Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08982643241297193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the factor structure and predictive utility of four instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) measures to identify cognitive status changes among older adults enrolled in the ACTIVE Trial.</p><p><strong>Major findings: </strong>Extracted factors represented IADL instruments. Baseline performance on the Everyday Problems Test (EPT) predicted 5-year MMSE scores (est. = .08, <i>p</i> < .001), adjusting for demographic and health covariates, baseline MMSE, self-reported IADL function, and the performance-based Observed Tasks of Daily Living and Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessments. For each 1-point increase in baseline EPT financial performance, the odds of cognitive impairment decreased by 26%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IADL functional domains were not interchangeable across instruments. The EPT demonstrated better predictive utility compared to other instruments for detecting subsequent cognitive decline/impairment. This is a useful step in developing effective tools to detect early functional deficits indicating subsequent clinical impairment. Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Trial (ACTIVE), NCT00298558, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00298558.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8982643241297193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643241297193\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643241297193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究四种工具性日常生活活动(IADL)测量方法的因子结构和预测效用,以确定参加 ACTIVE 试验的老年人的认知状况变化:提取的因子代表了 IADL 工具。日常问题测试(EPT)的基线表现预测了5年的MMSE得分(est. = .08,p < .001),调整了人口统计学和健康协变量、基线MMSE、自我报告的IADL功能以及基于表现的日常生活观察任务和定时日常生活工具活动评估。基线EPT财务表现每提高1分,认知障碍的几率就会降低26%:不同工具的 IADL 功能域不可互换。与其他工具相比,EPT 在检测后续认知能力下降/受损方面具有更好的预测效用。这对于开发有效工具以检测早期功能障碍、预示后续临床损害非常有用。独立和活力老人高级认知训练试验(ACTIVE),NCT00298558,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00298558。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Utility of Four Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Assessments and Cognitive Status Changes Among Cognitively In-Tact Older Adults.

Purpose: To examine the factor structure and predictive utility of four instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) measures to identify cognitive status changes among older adults enrolled in the ACTIVE Trial.

Major findings: Extracted factors represented IADL instruments. Baseline performance on the Everyday Problems Test (EPT) predicted 5-year MMSE scores (est. = .08, p < .001), adjusting for demographic and health covariates, baseline MMSE, self-reported IADL function, and the performance-based Observed Tasks of Daily Living and Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessments. For each 1-point increase in baseline EPT financial performance, the odds of cognitive impairment decreased by 26%.

Conclusions: IADL functional domains were not interchangeable across instruments. The EPT demonstrated better predictive utility compared to other instruments for detecting subsequent cognitive decline/impairment. This is a useful step in developing effective tools to detect early functional deficits indicating subsequent clinical impairment. Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Trial (ACTIVE), NCT00298558, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00298558.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood Built Environments and Health in Later Life: A Literature Review. Age Changes in Religious Service Attendance in Mexican American Older Adults: A Growth Curve Analysis. Coping with Discrimination: A Longitudinal Study of Health Outcomes in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual and Heterosexual Midlife and Older Adults. An Exploration of Methods to Resolve Inconsistent Self-Reporting of Chronic Conditions and Impact on Multimorbidity in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Exploring the Characteristics of Men Aged 55+ Who Use Mental Health Community Care and Support Services: A Secondary Analysis of the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Study in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1