排球运动的训练负荷与损伤:基于不同方法计算急性与慢性工作量比率的方法。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1177/19417381241293771
Thiago Ferreira Timoteo, Paula Barreiros Debien, Diogo Simões Fonseca, Diogo Carvalho Felício, Mauricio Gattás Bara Filho
{"title":"排球运动的训练负荷与损伤:基于不同方法计算急性与慢性工作量比率的方法。","authors":"Thiago Ferreira Timoteo, Paula Barreiros Debien, Diogo Simões Fonseca, Diogo Carvalho Felício, Mauricio Gattás Bara Filho","doi":"10.1177/19417381241293771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many questions persist regarding the relationship between training load and injuries in volleyball, as well as the best method for calculating acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between different metrics of training load and risk of injury in male professional volleyball players.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>ACWR, as a training load measure, is useful for identifying injury risk in volleyball players, regardless of calculation method.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Longitudinal, prospective, and observational design conducted over 3 seasons of professional male volleyball.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 43 male volleyball players. Internal training load was quantified using the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion. From daily training load values, absolute measures and relative measures were computed. For relative measures, 7 days were employed for acute training load, and 21 and 28 days for chronic training load. A distinction was made between coupled calculation and uncoupled calculation. Injuries were documented using the Injury Surveillance Form proposed by the International Volleyball Federation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACWR calculated in a coupled manner and by a rolling average demonstrated higher injury risks when analyzing the complete periods (odds ratio [OR] ACWR 7:28 = 2.040; ACWR 7:21 = 1.980) and competitive period (OR ACWR 7:28 = 2.044; ACWR 7:21 = 2.087). In contrast, during the preseason, the coupled exponential averages were more sensitive to the risk of injury (OR ACWR 7:28 = 4.370; ACWR 7.504).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both measures using rolling averages and those calculated from exponential averages can be employed to identify the risk of injuries in volleyball athletes.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The findings of this study can be useful to coaching staff, fitness trainers, and healthcare professionals involved in the challenge of reducing the risk of injury in volleyball athletes. The need for continuous monitoring and real-time adjustments of training load is emphasized.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381241293771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training Load and Injuries in Volleyball: An Approach Based on Different Methods of Calculating Acute to Chronic Workload Ratio.\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Ferreira Timoteo, Paula Barreiros Debien, Diogo Simões Fonseca, Diogo Carvalho Felício, Mauricio Gattás Bara Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381241293771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many questions persist regarding the relationship between training load and injuries in volleyball, as well as the best method for calculating acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between different metrics of training load and risk of injury in male professional volleyball players.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>ACWR, as a training load measure, is useful for identifying injury risk in volleyball players, regardless of calculation method.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Longitudinal, prospective, and observational design conducted over 3 seasons of professional male volleyball.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 43 male volleyball players. Internal training load was quantified using the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion. From daily training load values, absolute measures and relative measures were computed. For relative measures, 7 days were employed for acute training load, and 21 and 28 days for chronic training load. A distinction was made between coupled calculation and uncoupled calculation. Injuries were documented using the Injury Surveillance Form proposed by the International Volleyball Federation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACWR calculated in a coupled manner and by a rolling average demonstrated higher injury risks when analyzing the complete periods (odds ratio [OR] ACWR 7:28 = 2.040; ACWR 7:21 = 1.980) and competitive period (OR ACWR 7:28 = 2.044; ACWR 7:21 = 2.087). In contrast, during the preseason, the coupled exponential averages were more sensitive to the risk of injury (OR ACWR 7:28 = 4.370; ACWR 7.504).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both measures using rolling averages and those calculated from exponential averages can be employed to identify the risk of injuries in volleyball athletes.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The findings of this study can be useful to coaching staff, fitness trainers, and healthcare professionals involved in the challenge of reducing the risk of injury in volleyball athletes. The need for continuous monitoring and real-time adjustments of training load is emphasized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19417381241293771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241293771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241293771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于排球运动中训练负荷与损伤之间的关系,以及计算急性与慢性工作负荷比(ACWR)的最佳方法,一直存在许多疑问。本研究旨在调查训练负荷的不同指标与男子职业排球运动员受伤风险之间的关系:假设:无论采用哪种计算方法,ACWR 作为一种训练负荷指标,都有助于识别排球运动员的受伤风险:研究设计:纵向、前瞻性和观察性设计,在三个赛季的职业男子排球比赛中进行:证据等级:3 级:研究包括 43 名男子排球运动员。内部训练负荷使用 "会话感知劳累分级 "进行量化。根据每日训练负荷值计算出绝对值和相对值。对于相对测量值,急性训练负荷采用 7 天,慢性训练负荷采用 21 天和 28 天。耦合计算和非耦合计算有所区别。受伤情况使用国际排联提出的受伤监测表进行记录:结果:以耦合方式和滚动平均值计算的 ACWR 在分析完整周期(几率比 [OR] ACWR 7:28 = 2.040;ACWR 7:21 = 1.980)和竞技周期(OR ACWR 7:28 = 2.044;ACWR 7:21 = 2.087)时显示出更高的受伤风险。相比之下,在季前赛期间,耦合指数平均值对受伤风险更为敏感(OR ACWR 7:28 = 4.370; ACWR 7.504):结论:使用滚动平均值和指数平均值计算的测量方法均可用于识别排球运动员的受伤风险:这项研究的结果对教练员、体能教练和医护人员都很有用,他们都参与到降低排球运动员受伤风险的挑战中。研究强调了持续监测和实时调整训练负荷的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Training Load and Injuries in Volleyball: An Approach Based on Different Methods of Calculating Acute to Chronic Workload Ratio.

Background: Many questions persist regarding the relationship between training load and injuries in volleyball, as well as the best method for calculating acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between different metrics of training load and risk of injury in male professional volleyball players.

Hypothesis: ACWR, as a training load measure, is useful for identifying injury risk in volleyball players, regardless of calculation method.

Study design: Longitudinal, prospective, and observational design conducted over 3 seasons of professional male volleyball.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: The study included 43 male volleyball players. Internal training load was quantified using the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion. From daily training load values, absolute measures and relative measures were computed. For relative measures, 7 days were employed for acute training load, and 21 and 28 days for chronic training load. A distinction was made between coupled calculation and uncoupled calculation. Injuries were documented using the Injury Surveillance Form proposed by the International Volleyball Federation.

Results: ACWR calculated in a coupled manner and by a rolling average demonstrated higher injury risks when analyzing the complete periods (odds ratio [OR] ACWR 7:28 = 2.040; ACWR 7:21 = 1.980) and competitive period (OR ACWR 7:28 = 2.044; ACWR 7:21 = 2.087). In contrast, during the preseason, the coupled exponential averages were more sensitive to the risk of injury (OR ACWR 7:28 = 4.370; ACWR 7.504).

Conclusion: Both measures using rolling averages and those calculated from exponential averages can be employed to identify the risk of injuries in volleyball athletes.

Clinical relevance: The findings of this study can be useful to coaching staff, fitness trainers, and healthcare professionals involved in the challenge of reducing the risk of injury in volleyball athletes. The need for continuous monitoring and real-time adjustments of training load is emphasized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Youth and Young Adult Sport Training Patterns, Specialization, and Return to Sport Durations. A Narrative Review of Softball Pitching Workload and Pitch Counts in Relationship to Injury. A Novel Approach for Monitoring Training Load and Wellness in Women's College Gymnastics. Could Motor Imagery Training Provide a Novel Load Management Solution for Athletes? Recommendations for Sport Medicine and Performance Practitioners. Small-Sided-Game-Induced Mechanical Load in Adolescent Soccer: The Need for Care and Consideration for Athlete Preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1