认知行为疗法中的分层护理:个性化治疗预测模型方法的比较评估。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1177/07067437241295635
Margaret Jamieson, Andrew Putman, Marsha Bryan, Bojay Hansen, Phillip E Klassen, Nicholas Li, Bethany McQuaid, David Rudoler
{"title":"认知行为疗法中的分层护理:个性化治疗预测模型方法的比较评估。","authors":"Margaret Jamieson, Andrew Putman, Marsha Bryan, Bojay Hansen, Phillip E Klassen, Nicholas Li, Bethany McQuaid, David Rudoler","doi":"10.1177/07067437241295635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In response to high demand and prolonged wait times for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in Ontario, Canada, we developed predictive models to stratify patients into high- or low-intensity treatment, aiming to optimize limited healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using client records (<i>n</i> = 953) from Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (January 2017-2021), we estimated four binary outcome models to assign patients into complex and standard cases based on the probability of reliable improvement in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores. We evaluated two choices of cut-offs for patient complexity assignment: models at an ROC (receiver operating characteristic)-derived cut-off and a 0.5 probability cut-off. Final model effectiveness was assessed by assigning treatment intensity (high-intensity or low-intensity CBT) based on the combined performance of both GAD-7 and PHQ-9 models. We compared the treatment assignment recommendations provided by the models to those assigned by clinical assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predictive models demonstrated higher accuracy in selecting treatment modality compared to provider-assigned treatment selection. The ROC cut-off achieved the highest prediction accuracy of case complexity (0.749). The predictive models exhibited large sensitivity and specificity trade-offs (which influence the rates of patient assignment to high-intensity CBT) despite having similar accuracy statistics (ROC cut-off = 0.749, 0.5 cut-off = 0.690), emphasizing the impact of cut-off choices when implementing predictive models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our findings suggest that the predictive model has the potential to improve the allocation of CBT services by shifting incoming clients with milder symptoms of depression to low-intensity CBT, with those at highest risk of not improving beginning in high-intensity CBT. We have demonstrated that models can have significant sensitivity and specificity trade-offs depending on the chosen acceptable threshold for the model to make positive predictions of case complexity. Further research could assess the use of the predictive model in real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary title: </strong>Stratified Care in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Comparative Evaluation of Predictive Modeling Approaches for Individualized Treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"880-887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratified Care in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Comparative Evaluation of Predictive Modelling Approaches for Individualized Treatment: La stratification des soins pour l'orientation vers une thérapie cognitivo-comportementale: une évaluation comparative des approches de modélisation prédictive pour un traitement individualisé.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Jamieson, Andrew Putman, Marsha Bryan, Bojay Hansen, Phillip E Klassen, Nicholas Li, Bethany McQuaid, David Rudoler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07067437241295635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In response to high demand and prolonged wait times for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in Ontario, Canada, we developed predictive models to stratify patients into high- or low-intensity treatment, aiming to optimize limited healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using client records (<i>n</i> = 953) from Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (January 2017-2021), we estimated four binary outcome models to assign patients into complex and standard cases based on the probability of reliable improvement in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores. We evaluated two choices of cut-offs for patient complexity assignment: models at an ROC (receiver operating characteristic)-derived cut-off and a 0.5 probability cut-off. Final model effectiveness was assessed by assigning treatment intensity (high-intensity or low-intensity CBT) based on the combined performance of both GAD-7 and PHQ-9 models. We compared the treatment assignment recommendations provided by the models to those assigned by clinical assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predictive models demonstrated higher accuracy in selecting treatment modality compared to provider-assigned treatment selection. The ROC cut-off achieved the highest prediction accuracy of case complexity (0.749). The predictive models exhibited large sensitivity and specificity trade-offs (which influence the rates of patient assignment to high-intensity CBT) despite having similar accuracy statistics (ROC cut-off = 0.749, 0.5 cut-off = 0.690), emphasizing the impact of cut-off choices when implementing predictive models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our findings suggest that the predictive model has the potential to improve the allocation of CBT services by shifting incoming clients with milder symptoms of depression to low-intensity CBT, with those at highest risk of not improving beginning in high-intensity CBT. We have demonstrated that models can have significant sensitivity and specificity trade-offs depending on the chosen acceptable threshold for the model to make positive predictions of case complexity. Further research could assess the use of the predictive model in real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary title: </strong>Stratified Care in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Comparative Evaluation of Predictive Modeling Approaches for Individualized Treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"880-887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241295635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241295635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:针对加拿大安大略省认知行为疗法(CBT)的高需求量和漫长的等待时间,我们开发了预测模型,将患者分层为高强度或低强度治疗,旨在优化有限的医疗资源:利用安大略省海岸心理健康科学中心(Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences)的客户记录(n = 953)(2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月),我们估算了四个二元结果模型,根据患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和广泛焦虑症-7(GAD-7)得分的可靠改善概率,将患者分为复杂病例和标准病例。我们评估了患者复杂性分配的两种临界值选择:ROC(接收者操作特征)得出的临界值模型和 0.5 概率临界值模型。根据 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 模型的综合表现,通过分配治疗强度(高强度或低强度 CBT)来评估模型的最终有效性。我们将模型提供的治疗分配建议与临床评估人员的建议进行了比较:结果:与提供者指定的治疗选择相比,预测模型在选择治疗方式方面表现出更高的准确性。ROC 临界值对病例复杂性的预测准确率最高(0.749)。尽管预测模型具有相似的准确性统计(ROC 临界值 = 0.749,0.5 临界值 = 0.690),但却表现出较大的灵敏度和特异性权衡(影响患者被分配到高强度 CBT 的比率),这强调了在实施预测模型时选择临界值的影响:总之,我们的研究结果表明,预测模型具有改善 CBT 服务分配的潜力,它能将抑郁症状较轻的患者转移到低强度的 CBT,而那些抑郁症状没有改善的高风险患者则开始接受高强度的 CBT。我们已经证明,根据模型对病例复杂性做出积极预测时所选择的可接受阈值,模型可能会在灵敏度和特异性方面做出重大权衡。进一步的研究可以评估预测模型在实际临床环境中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stratified Care in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Comparative Evaluation of Predictive Modelling Approaches for Individualized Treatment: La stratification des soins pour l'orientation vers une thérapie cognitivo-comportementale: une évaluation comparative des approches de modélisation prédictive pour un traitement individualisé.

Objective: In response to high demand and prolonged wait times for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in Ontario, Canada, we developed predictive models to stratify patients into high- or low-intensity treatment, aiming to optimize limited healthcare resources.

Method: Using client records (n = 953) from Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (January 2017-2021), we estimated four binary outcome models to assign patients into complex and standard cases based on the probability of reliable improvement in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores. We evaluated two choices of cut-offs for patient complexity assignment: models at an ROC (receiver operating characteristic)-derived cut-off and a 0.5 probability cut-off. Final model effectiveness was assessed by assigning treatment intensity (high-intensity or low-intensity CBT) based on the combined performance of both GAD-7 and PHQ-9 models. We compared the treatment assignment recommendations provided by the models to those assigned by clinical assessors.

Results: The predictive models demonstrated higher accuracy in selecting treatment modality compared to provider-assigned treatment selection. The ROC cut-off achieved the highest prediction accuracy of case complexity (0.749). The predictive models exhibited large sensitivity and specificity trade-offs (which influence the rates of patient assignment to high-intensity CBT) despite having similar accuracy statistics (ROC cut-off = 0.749, 0.5 cut-off = 0.690), emphasizing the impact of cut-off choices when implementing predictive models.

Conclusions: Overall, our findings suggest that the predictive model has the potential to improve the allocation of CBT services by shifting incoming clients with milder symptoms of depression to low-intensity CBT, with those at highest risk of not improving beginning in high-intensity CBT. We have demonstrated that models can have significant sensitivity and specificity trade-offs depending on the chosen acceptable threshold for the model to make positive predictions of case complexity. Further research could assess the use of the predictive model in real-world clinical settings.

Plain language summary title: Stratified Care in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Comparative Evaluation of Predictive Modeling Approaches for Individualized Treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments Task Force Recommendations for the Use of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Fecal Microbiota Transplants in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: Recommandations du Groupe de travail du Réseau canadien pour le traitement des troubles de l'humeur et de l'anxiété (Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments, CANMAT) concernant l'utilisation des probiotiques, des prébiotiques, des symbiotiques et de la transplantation de microbiote fécal chez les adultes atteints de trouble dépressif majeur. Rising Escitalopram Use in British Columbia: Is it Rational and Evidence-Informed? Health-Related Outcome Improvements Via the ACCESS Open Minds Youth Mental Health Service Transformation Project in Edmonton, Canada: Amélioration des résultats en matière de santé grâce au projet de transformation des services de santé mentale jeunes d'ACCESS Open Minds/Esprits ouverts à Edmonton, Canada. What Matters Most When Visiting a Rapid Access Addiction Medicine Clinic in Canada for Alcohol Use Care: A National eDelphi Study: Ce qui compte le plus lorsque l'on visite une clinique d'accès rapide au traitement médical de la toxicomanie (RAAM) au Canada pour des soins liés à la consommation d'alcool : une étude eDelphi nationale. Changes in Cross-Sectional Associations Between Cannabis Use and Anxiety, Depression, and Suicidality in a Nationally Representative Sample of Canadians From 2012 to 2022: Évolution des relations transversales entre la consommation de cannabis et la dépression, l'anxiété et les idées suicidaires au sein d'un échantillon représentatif de Canadiens à l'échelle nationale, de 2012 à 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1