生命体征是非休克性心脏骤停后接受体外心肺复苏术的有利预测指标。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.046
Naofumi Bunya MD, PhD , Hirofumi Ohnishi MD, PhD , Takehiko Kasai MD , Ryo Nishikawa MD , Keigo Sawamoto MD , Shuji Uemura MD, PhD , Narimatsu Eichi MD, PhD
{"title":"生命体征是非休克性心脏骤停后接受体外心肺复苏术的有利预测指标。","authors":"Naofumi Bunya MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Ohnishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takehiko Kasai MD ,&nbsp;Ryo Nishikawa MD ,&nbsp;Keigo Sawamoto MD ,&nbsp;Shuji Uemura MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Narimatsu Eichi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>When the initial rhythm of cardiac arrest is non-shockable, resuscitation outcomes tend to be unfavorable. However, signs of life (gasping, pupillary light reaction, or any form of body movement) have been suggested as favorable prognostic factors for patients with refractory cardiac arrest who are undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This study determined whether signs of life are favorable neurological prognostic factors for patients undergoing ECPR post non-shockable cardiac arrest.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study included 227 refractory out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients who had undergone ECPR, divided into four groups according to shockability of initial cardiac rhythms and presence of signs of life. Initial cardiac rhythms were shockable in 154 patients (67.8 %) and non-shockable in 73 (32.2). Favorable neurological outcomes were observed in 4.1 %, 48.2 %, 0.0 %, and 38.7 % of patients with shockable rhythm without signs of life, shockable rhythm with signs of life, non-shockable rhythm without signs of life, and non-shockable rhythm with signs of life, respectively, with significant differences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an independent association of signs of life during resuscitation with favorable neurological outcomes. The adjusted odds ratios for patients with shockable and non-shockable rhythm with signs of life were 34.33 and 96.51, respectively, compared with those without signs of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Signs of life during resuscitation were favorable prognostic factors in patients with refractory cardiac arrest and non-shockable rhythm. When these patients are considered for ECPR, the status of signs of life during resuscitation may facilitate the decision to perform ECPR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"87 ","pages":"Pages 95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signs of life as a favorable predictor for non-shockable cardiac arrest undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation post non-shockable cardiac arrest\",\"authors\":\"Naofumi Bunya MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Ohnishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takehiko Kasai MD ,&nbsp;Ryo Nishikawa MD ,&nbsp;Keigo Sawamoto MD ,&nbsp;Shuji Uemura MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Narimatsu Eichi MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>When the initial rhythm of cardiac arrest is non-shockable, resuscitation outcomes tend to be unfavorable. However, signs of life (gasping, pupillary light reaction, or any form of body movement) have been suggested as favorable prognostic factors for patients with refractory cardiac arrest who are undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This study determined whether signs of life are favorable neurological prognostic factors for patients undergoing ECPR post non-shockable cardiac arrest.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study included 227 refractory out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients who had undergone ECPR, divided into four groups according to shockability of initial cardiac rhythms and presence of signs of life. Initial cardiac rhythms were shockable in 154 patients (67.8 %) and non-shockable in 73 (32.2). Favorable neurological outcomes were observed in 4.1 %, 48.2 %, 0.0 %, and 38.7 % of patients with shockable rhythm without signs of life, shockable rhythm with signs of life, non-shockable rhythm without signs of life, and non-shockable rhythm with signs of life, respectively, with significant differences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an independent association of signs of life during resuscitation with favorable neurological outcomes. The adjusted odds ratios for patients with shockable and non-shockable rhythm with signs of life were 34.33 and 96.51, respectively, compared with those without signs of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Signs of life during resuscitation were favorable prognostic factors in patients with refractory cardiac arrest and non-shockable rhythm. When these patients are considered for ECPR, the status of signs of life during resuscitation may facilitate the decision to perform ECPR.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005606\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当心脏骤停的初始节律为非休克时,复苏效果往往不佳。然而,生命迹象(喘息、瞳孔光反应或任何形式的身体运动)被认为是正在接受体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的难治性心脏骤停患者的有利预后因素。本研究确定了生命迹象是否是接受 ECPR 的非休克性心脏骤停患者神经预后的有利因素:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 227 名接受过 ECPR 的难治性院外心脏骤停患者,根据初始心律的可电击性和生命体征的存在分为四组。初始心律可电击的患者有 154 人(67.8%),不可电击的患者有 73 人(32.2%)。在无生命体征的可电击心律、有生命体征的可电击心律、无生命体征的非可电击心律和有生命体征的非可电击心律患者中,分别有 4.1%、48.2%、0.0% 和 38.7%的患者观察到了良好的神经功能预后,且差异显著。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,复苏期间的生命体征与良好的神经系统预后有独立关联。与无生命体征的患者相比,有生命体征的可电击和不可电击心律患者的调整后几率分别为 34.33 和 96.51:结论:复苏过程中的生命迹象是难治性心脏骤停和不可电击心律患者的有利预后因素。当考虑对这些患者进行 ECPR 时,复苏期间的生命体征状况可能有助于做出实施 ECPR 的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Signs of life as a favorable predictor for non-shockable cardiac arrest undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation post non-shockable cardiac arrest

Background

When the initial rhythm of cardiac arrest is non-shockable, resuscitation outcomes tend to be unfavorable. However, signs of life (gasping, pupillary light reaction, or any form of body movement) have been suggested as favorable prognostic factors for patients with refractory cardiac arrest who are undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This study determined whether signs of life are favorable neurological prognostic factors for patients undergoing ECPR post non-shockable cardiac arrest.

Methods and results

This single-center retrospective study included 227 refractory out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients who had undergone ECPR, divided into four groups according to shockability of initial cardiac rhythms and presence of signs of life. Initial cardiac rhythms were shockable in 154 patients (67.8 %) and non-shockable in 73 (32.2). Favorable neurological outcomes were observed in 4.1 %, 48.2 %, 0.0 %, and 38.7 % of patients with shockable rhythm without signs of life, shockable rhythm with signs of life, non-shockable rhythm without signs of life, and non-shockable rhythm with signs of life, respectively, with significant differences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an independent association of signs of life during resuscitation with favorable neurological outcomes. The adjusted odds ratios for patients with shockable and non-shockable rhythm with signs of life were 34.33 and 96.51, respectively, compared with those without signs of life.

Conclusions

Signs of life during resuscitation were favorable prognostic factors in patients with refractory cardiac arrest and non-shockable rhythm. When these patients are considered for ECPR, the status of signs of life during resuscitation may facilitate the decision to perform ECPR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Early crystalloid resuscitation in Trauma: How much is too much? Insights from a National Trauma Registry Impact of doxycycline discharge kits on appropriate treatment of sexually transmitted infections among patients in the ED Response to commentary on "A new score predicting renal replacement therapy in patients with crush injuries: Analysis of a major earthquake". Factors associated with emergency department methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage in patients with skin and soft tissue infections in an urban, tertiary care emergency department Bariatric surgery complications: Purulent pericarditis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1