中风后痉挛治疗:加拿大艾伯塔省的一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1017/cjn.2024.342
Lalith Satkunam, Sean P Dukelow, Jaime C Yu, Stephen McNeil, Huong Luu, Karen J B Martins, Khanh Vu, Phuong Uyen Nguyen, Lawrence Richer, Tyler Williamson, Scott W Klarenbach
{"title":"中风后痉挛治疗:加拿大艾伯塔省的一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Lalith Satkunam, Sean P Dukelow, Jaime C Yu, Stephen McNeil, Huong Luu, Karen J B Martins, Khanh Vu, Phuong Uyen Nguyen, Lawrence Richer, Tyler Williamson, Scott W Klarenbach","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding post-stroke spasticity (PSS) treatment in everyday clinical practice may guide improvements in patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that used population-level administrative data. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who initiated PSS treatment (defined by the first PSS clinic visit, focal botulinum toxin injection, or anti-spasticity medication dispensation [baclofen, dantrolene and tizanidine] with none of these treatments occurring during the 2 years before the stroke) were identified between 2012 and 2019 in Alberta, Canada. Spasticity treatment use, time to treatment start and type of prescribing/treating physician were measured. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the cohort (n = 1,079), the most common PSS treatment was oral baclofen (initial treatment: 60.9%; received on/after the initial treatment date up to March 31, 2020: 69.0%), largely prescribed by primary care physicians (77.6%) and started a median of 348 (IQR 741) days after the stroke. Focal botulinum toxin (23.3%; 37.7%) was largely prescribed by physiatrists (72.2%) and started 311 (IQR 446) days after the stroke; spasticity clinic visits (18.6%; 23.8%) were also common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found evidence of gaps in provision of spasticity management in persons with PSS including overuse of systemic oral baclofen (that has common adverse side effects and lacks evidence of effectiveness in PSS) and potential underuse of focal botulinum toxin injections. Further investigation and strategies should be pursued to improve alignment of PSS treatment with guideline recommendations that in turn will support better outcomes for those with PSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Stroke Spasticity Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study From Alberta, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Lalith Satkunam, Sean P Dukelow, Jaime C Yu, Stephen McNeil, Huong Luu, Karen J B Martins, Khanh Vu, Phuong Uyen Nguyen, Lawrence Richer, Tyler Williamson, Scott W Klarenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding post-stroke spasticity (PSS) treatment in everyday clinical practice may guide improvements in patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that used population-level administrative data. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who initiated PSS treatment (defined by the first PSS clinic visit, focal botulinum toxin injection, or anti-spasticity medication dispensation [baclofen, dantrolene and tizanidine] with none of these treatments occurring during the 2 years before the stroke) were identified between 2012 and 2019 in Alberta, Canada. Spasticity treatment use, time to treatment start and type of prescribing/treating physician were measured. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the cohort (n = 1,079), the most common PSS treatment was oral baclofen (initial treatment: 60.9%; received on/after the initial treatment date up to March 31, 2020: 69.0%), largely prescribed by primary care physicians (77.6%) and started a median of 348 (IQR 741) days after the stroke. Focal botulinum toxin (23.3%; 37.7%) was largely prescribed by physiatrists (72.2%) and started 311 (IQR 446) days after the stroke; spasticity clinic visits (18.6%; 23.8%) were also common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found evidence of gaps in provision of spasticity management in persons with PSS including overuse of systemic oral baclofen (that has common adverse side effects and lacks evidence of effectiveness in PSS) and potential underuse of focal botulinum toxin injections. Further investigation and strategies should be pursued to improve alignment of PSS treatment with guideline recommendations that in turn will support better outcomes for those with PSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在日常临床实践中了解脑卒中后痉挛(PSS)的治疗可以指导患者护理的改进。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用人口水平的行政数据。2012年至2019年在加拿大阿尔伯塔省确定了开始PSS治疗的成年人(年龄≥18岁)(定义为首次PSS门诊就诊、局灶性肉毒杆菌毒素注射或抗痉挛药物配药[巴氯芬、丹trolene和替扎尼定],这些治疗在卒中前2年内均未发生)。测量痉挛治疗的使用、开始治疗的时间和开处方/治疗医生的类型。进行描述性统计。结果:在队列中(n = 1079),最常见的PSS治疗是口服巴氯芬(初始治疗:60.9%;在初始治疗日期(截至2020年3月31日)当天/之后接受治疗:69.0%),主要由初级保健医生开具处方(77.6%),中位数为中风后348天(IQR 741)。局灶性肉毒杆菌毒素(23.3%;37.7%)主要由物理医生开具处方(72.2%),并在中风后311天(IQR 446)开始;痉挛门诊就诊(18.6%;23.8%)也很常见。结论:我们发现了PSS患者痉挛管理存在不足的证据,包括过度使用全身口服巴氯芬(有常见的不良反应,缺乏证据表明对PSS有效)和局部肉毒毒素注射可能使用不足。应采取进一步的调查和策略,以改善PSS治疗与指南建议的一致性,从而支持PSS患者获得更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-Stroke Spasticity Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study From Alberta, Canada.

Background: Understanding post-stroke spasticity (PSS) treatment in everyday clinical practice may guide improvements in patient care.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that used population-level administrative data. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who initiated PSS treatment (defined by the first PSS clinic visit, focal botulinum toxin injection, or anti-spasticity medication dispensation [baclofen, dantrolene and tizanidine] with none of these treatments occurring during the 2 years before the stroke) were identified between 2012 and 2019 in Alberta, Canada. Spasticity treatment use, time to treatment start and type of prescribing/treating physician were measured. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: Within the cohort (n = 1,079), the most common PSS treatment was oral baclofen (initial treatment: 60.9%; received on/after the initial treatment date up to March 31, 2020: 69.0%), largely prescribed by primary care physicians (77.6%) and started a median of 348 (IQR 741) days after the stroke. Focal botulinum toxin (23.3%; 37.7%) was largely prescribed by physiatrists (72.2%) and started 311 (IQR 446) days after the stroke; spasticity clinic visits (18.6%; 23.8%) were also common.

Conclusions: We found evidence of gaps in provision of spasticity management in persons with PSS including overuse of systemic oral baclofen (that has common adverse side effects and lacks evidence of effectiveness in PSS) and potential underuse of focal botulinum toxin injections. Further investigation and strategies should be pursued to improve alignment of PSS treatment with guideline recommendations that in turn will support better outcomes for those with PSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
期刊最新文献
Access to Endovascular Thrombectomy: Does Driving Time to Comprehensive Stroke Center Matter More than Rurality? Creation and evolution of the Ontario Stroke Registry: protocol and two decades of data from a population-based clinical stroke registry. Improving Epilepsy Care in Ontario, Canada: the Impact of a Provincial Strategy for Epilepsy Care. Deep Brain Stimulation for Substance Use Disorder: Case Report of Fentanyl Use Disorder and Review of the Literature. Safety of Dabigatran in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Microbleeds: Post hoc Analysis of DATAS-II Randomized Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1