门诊护理环境中的处方错误:降低门诊用药单中的风险,横断面回顾。

Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.36401/JQSH-24-2
Wesam S Abdel-Razaq, Ghada Mardawi, Aiman A Obaidat, Lama Aljahani, Maram Almutairi, Reham Almotiri, Nataleen A Albekairy, Tariq Aldebasi, Abdulkareem M Albekairy, Mohammad S Shawaqfeh
{"title":"门诊护理环境中的处方错误:降低门诊用药单中的风险,横断面回顾。","authors":"Wesam S Abdel-Razaq, Ghada Mardawi, Aiman A Obaidat, Lama Aljahani, Maram Almutairi, Reham Almotiri, Nataleen A Albekairy, Tariq Aldebasi, Abdulkareem M Albekairy, Mohammad S Shawaqfeh","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-24-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescribing errors (PEs) are the most common type of medication error, which may occur by prescribing the wrong medication, improper dose, dosage, and/or even prescribing a drug to the wrong patient. The present study aims to compile PEs that were generated in an ambulatory care setting at a tertiary-care hospital in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional review was conducted for all reported PEs in ambulatory care clinics for 3 years. The potential hazardous outcomes of these PEs were classified according to the medication error index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 897 records containing 1199 PEs were retrieved. More than a third of prescribers had frequently committed PEs-ranging from 2 to 39 times. The most encountered errors were prescribing incorrect doses, medication duplication, incorrect dosing frequency, and inappropriate duration (34.5%, 14.1%, 11.6%, and 9.8%, respectively). The most frequent mistakes were when prescribing antibiotics (22.9%) and drugs for cardiovascular conditions (18.5%). Most errors were of mild to moderate severity, mostly type-B near-miss errors and did not reach patients. Only two prescription events (0.17%) had severe consequences that required intervention to avoid any subsequent harm or damage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current investigation has revealed a substantial percentage of PEs, mostly in internal medicine and cardiology departments. Although PEs are undoubtedly not easy to avoid, monitoring and recognizing these inaccuracies is pivotal to preventing potential harm and promoting patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"7 4","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.\",\"authors\":\"Wesam S Abdel-Razaq, Ghada Mardawi, Aiman A Obaidat, Lama Aljahani, Maram Almutairi, Reham Almotiri, Nataleen A Albekairy, Tariq Aldebasi, Abdulkareem M Albekairy, Mohammad S Shawaqfeh\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/JQSH-24-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescribing errors (PEs) are the most common type of medication error, which may occur by prescribing the wrong medication, improper dose, dosage, and/or even prescribing a drug to the wrong patient. The present study aims to compile PEs that were generated in an ambulatory care setting at a tertiary-care hospital in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional review was conducted for all reported PEs in ambulatory care clinics for 3 years. The potential hazardous outcomes of these PEs were classified according to the medication error index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 897 records containing 1199 PEs were retrieved. More than a third of prescribers had frequently committed PEs-ranging from 2 to 39 times. The most encountered errors were prescribing incorrect doses, medication duplication, incorrect dosing frequency, and inappropriate duration (34.5%, 14.1%, 11.6%, and 9.8%, respectively). The most frequent mistakes were when prescribing antibiotics (22.9%) and drugs for cardiovascular conditions (18.5%). Most errors were of mild to moderate severity, mostly type-B near-miss errors and did not reach patients. Only two prescription events (0.17%) had severe consequences that required intervention to avoid any subsequent harm or damage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current investigation has revealed a substantial percentage of PEs, mostly in internal medicine and cardiology departments. Although PEs are undoubtedly not easy to avoid, monitoring and recognizing these inaccuracies is pivotal to preventing potential harm and promoting patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"175-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-24-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-24-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:处方错误(PEs)是最常见的用药错误类型,可能通过开错药、不适当的剂量、用法和/或甚至给错误的病人开药而发生。本研究旨在对沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院门诊护理环境中发生的用药错误进行汇编:方法:对门诊护理诊所 3 年内报告的所有 PE 进行了回顾性横断面审查。根据用药错误指数对这些 PE 的潜在危险结果进行了分类:结果:共检索到 897 份记录,其中包含 1199 例 PE。超过三分之一的处方者经常发生 PE,次数从 2 次到 39 次不等。最常见的错误是处方剂量错误、用药重复、用药频率错误和用药时间不当(分别占 34.5%、14.1%、11.6% 和 9.8%)。最常见的错误是开抗生素(22.9%)和治疗心血管疾病的药物(18.5%)。大多数错误的严重程度为轻度至中度,多为 B 类近乎失误的错误,且未波及患者。只有两起处方事件(0.17%)造成了严重后果,需要进行干预以避免任何后续伤害或损害:目前的调查显示,PE 占了相当大的比例,主要发生在内科和心内科。尽管 PE 无疑不容易避免,但监测和识别这些不准确性对于防止潜在伤害和促进患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.

Introduction: Prescribing errors (PEs) are the most common type of medication error, which may occur by prescribing the wrong medication, improper dose, dosage, and/or even prescribing a drug to the wrong patient. The present study aims to compile PEs that were generated in an ambulatory care setting at a tertiary-care hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional review was conducted for all reported PEs in ambulatory care clinics for 3 years. The potential hazardous outcomes of these PEs were classified according to the medication error index.

Results: A total of 897 records containing 1199 PEs were retrieved. More than a third of prescribers had frequently committed PEs-ranging from 2 to 39 times. The most encountered errors were prescribing incorrect doses, medication duplication, incorrect dosing frequency, and inappropriate duration (34.5%, 14.1%, 11.6%, and 9.8%, respectively). The most frequent mistakes were when prescribing antibiotics (22.9%) and drugs for cardiovascular conditions (18.5%). Most errors were of mild to moderate severity, mostly type-B near-miss errors and did not reach patients. Only two prescription events (0.17%) had severe consequences that required intervention to avoid any subsequent harm or damage.

Conclusion: The current investigation has revealed a substantial percentage of PEs, mostly in internal medicine and cardiology departments. Although PEs are undoubtedly not easy to avoid, monitoring and recognizing these inaccuracies is pivotal to preventing potential harm and promoting patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care. Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions. Summary of the 5th International Pharmacoeconomics Forum. Community Health Needs Assessment of Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1