年轻与老年患者的乳头保留乳房切除术。

Antônio Luiz Frasson, Isabela Miranda, Betina Vollbrecht, Carolina Malhone, Ana Beatriz Falcone, Fernanda Barbosa, Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Martina Lichtenfels
{"title":"年轻与老年患者的乳头保留乳房切除术。","authors":"Antônio Luiz Frasson, Isabela Miranda, Betina Vollbrecht, Carolina Malhone, Ana Beatriz Falcone, Fernanda Barbosa, Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Martina Lichtenfels","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we compared indications and outcomes of 115 young (< 40 years) versus 40 elderly (> 60 years) patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as risk-reducing surgery or for breast cancer (BC) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2004 and December 2018, young and elderly patients undergoing NSM with complete data from at least 6 months of follow-up were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BC treatment was the main indication for NSM, observed in 85(73.9%) young versus 33(82.5%) elderly patients, followed by risk-reducing surgery in 30(26.1%) young versus 7(17.5%) elderly patients. Complication rates did not differ between the age groups. At a median follow-up of 43 months, the overall recurrence rate was higher in the younger cohort (p = 0.04). However, when stratified into local, locoregional, contralateral, and distant metastasis, no statistical difference was observed. During the follow-up, only 2(1.7%) young patients died.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings elucidate a higher recurrence rate of breast cancer in younger patients undergoing NSM, which may correlate with the fact that age is an independent prognostic factor. High overall survival and low complication rates were evidenced in the two groups showing the safety of NSM for young and elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"46 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nipple-sparing mastectomy in young versus elderly patients.\",\"authors\":\"Antônio Luiz Frasson, Isabela Miranda, Betina Vollbrecht, Carolina Malhone, Ana Beatriz Falcone, Fernanda Barbosa, Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Martina Lichtenfels\",\"doi\":\"10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we compared indications and outcomes of 115 young (< 40 years) versus 40 elderly (> 60 years) patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as risk-reducing surgery or for breast cancer (BC) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2004 and December 2018, young and elderly patients undergoing NSM with complete data from at least 6 months of follow-up were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BC treatment was the main indication for NSM, observed in 85(73.9%) young versus 33(82.5%) elderly patients, followed by risk-reducing surgery in 30(26.1%) young versus 7(17.5%) elderly patients. Complication rates did not differ between the age groups. At a median follow-up of 43 months, the overall recurrence rate was higher in the younger cohort (p = 0.04). However, when stratified into local, locoregional, contralateral, and distant metastasis, no statistical difference was observed. During the follow-up, only 2(1.7%) young patients died.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings elucidate a higher recurrence rate of breast cancer in younger patients undergoing NSM, which may correlate with the fact that age is an independent prognostic factor. High overall survival and low complication rates were evidenced in the two groups showing the safety of NSM for young and elderly patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554330/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的在这项研究中,我们比较了115名年轻患者(小于40岁)和40名老年患者(大于60岁)接受乳头保留乳房切除术(NSM)作为降低风险手术或乳腺癌(BC)治疗的适应症和结果:方法:纳入2004年1月至2018年12月期间接受乳头保留乳腺切除术且至少有6个月随访完整数据的年轻和老年患者:BC治疗是NSM的主要适应症,85(73.9%)名年轻患者和33(82.5%)名老年患者接受了NSM,其次是降低风险手术,30(26.1%)名年轻患者和7(17.5%)名老年患者接受了NSM。不同年龄组的并发症发生率没有差异。中位随访时间为43个月,年轻组的总体复发率更高(P = 0.04)。不过,如果按局部、局部区域、对侧和远处转移进行分层,则未观察到统计学差异。在随访期间,只有2名(1.7%)年轻患者死亡:我们的研究结果表明,接受 NSM 治疗的年轻患者的乳腺癌复发率较高,这可能与年龄是一个独立的预后因素有关。两组患者的总生存率都很高,并发症发生率也很低,这表明NSM对年轻患者和老年患者都很安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nipple-sparing mastectomy in young versus elderly patients.

Objective: In this study, we compared indications and outcomes of 115 young (< 40 years) versus 40 elderly (> 60 years) patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as risk-reducing surgery or for breast cancer (BC) treatment.

Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2018, young and elderly patients undergoing NSM with complete data from at least 6 months of follow-up were included.

Results: BC treatment was the main indication for NSM, observed in 85(73.9%) young versus 33(82.5%) elderly patients, followed by risk-reducing surgery in 30(26.1%) young versus 7(17.5%) elderly patients. Complication rates did not differ between the age groups. At a median follow-up of 43 months, the overall recurrence rate was higher in the younger cohort (p = 0.04). However, when stratified into local, locoregional, contralateral, and distant metastasis, no statistical difference was observed. During the follow-up, only 2(1.7%) young patients died.

Conclusion: Our findings elucidate a higher recurrence rate of breast cancer in younger patients undergoing NSM, which may correlate with the fact that age is an independent prognostic factor. High overall survival and low complication rates were evidenced in the two groups showing the safety of NSM for young and elderly patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The gynecologist and cancer in women. The role of HIV as an independent risk factor to cervical HSIL recurrence. Access and adequacy of antenatal care in a city in Brazil during two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Validation of Brazilian Version of the Sexual Desire Inventory 2 (SDI-2). Assessment of risk factors associated with post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1