深部脑刺激对睡眠的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Aryan Wadhwa, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Shreya Tripathy, Rohan Jha, Millen Wadhwa, Aaron E L Warren, Lan Luo, John D Rolston
{"title":"深部脑刺激对睡眠的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Aryan Wadhwa, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Shreya Tripathy, Rohan Jha, Millen Wadhwa, Aaron E L Warren, Lan Luo, John D Rolston","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a standard treatment for movement disorders, epilepsy, and others, yet its influence on postprocedural sleep quality remains an under-researched topic.</p><p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all DBS effects on sleep.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The use of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA) was utilized. We extracted demographic data, disease type/duration, DBS target, stimulation laterality (unilateral vs bilateral), follow-up lengths, and sleep pre/post-op measurements with polysomnography or across four standard sleep scales. The Cochrane methodology for evaluating RCTs was employed using the risk of bias assessments, data synthesis, and statistical methods, including forest plots (risk ratio; M-H random effects; 95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three studies were included in the overall analysis, representing 3022 patients. In a subgroup meta-analysis of subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD), patients showed significant sleep improvement at three but not 12 months postoperatively with PDSS, at 12 but not 3 months with Epworth sleep scale, and at 6 months with nonmotor symptom scale. Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) showed no significant improvement in sleep at any time. Bilateral DBS showed significantly more improvement than unilateral DBS in the PSQI at 6 but not 3 months. Polysomnography showed significant sleep improvement at 1 week but not at 3 or 6 months. Most studies showed no significant sleep improvement for globus pallidus internus, centromedian thalamus, and ventral intermediate nucleus DBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STN-DBS for PD likely improves sleep; however, significant standardization in sleep scale outcome reporting and follow-up time is needed to effectively determine the target-dependent effects of DBS surgery on sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"zpae079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of deep brain stimulation on sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aryan Wadhwa, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Shreya Tripathy, Rohan Jha, Millen Wadhwa, Aaron E L Warren, Lan Luo, John D Rolston\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a standard treatment for movement disorders, epilepsy, and others, yet its influence on postprocedural sleep quality remains an under-researched topic.</p><p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all DBS effects on sleep.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The use of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA) was utilized. We extracted demographic data, disease type/duration, DBS target, stimulation laterality (unilateral vs bilateral), follow-up lengths, and sleep pre/post-op measurements with polysomnography or across four standard sleep scales. The Cochrane methodology for evaluating RCTs was employed using the risk of bias assessments, data synthesis, and statistical methods, including forest plots (risk ratio; M-H random effects; 95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three studies were included in the overall analysis, representing 3022 patients. In a subgroup meta-analysis of subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD), patients showed significant sleep improvement at three but not 12 months postoperatively with PDSS, at 12 but not 3 months with Epworth sleep scale, and at 6 months with nonmotor symptom scale. Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) showed no significant improvement in sleep at any time. Bilateral DBS showed significantly more improvement than unilateral DBS in the PSQI at 6 but not 3 months. Polysomnography showed significant sleep improvement at 1 week but not at 3 or 6 months. Most studies showed no significant sleep improvement for globus pallidus internus, centromedian thalamus, and ventral intermediate nucleus DBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STN-DBS for PD likely improves sleep; however, significant standardization in sleep scale outcome reporting and follow-up time is needed to effectively determine the target-dependent effects of DBS surgery on sleep.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"zpae079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543990/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:深部脑刺激(DBS)是治疗运动障碍、癫痫等疾病的标准疗法,但其对术后睡眠质量的影响仍是一个研究不足的课题:我们对所有 DBS 对睡眠的影响进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:方法:采用系统综述和荟萃分析指南(PRISMA)的首选报告项目。我们提取了人口统计学数据、疾病类型/持续时间、DBS靶点、刺激侧位(单侧与双侧)、随访时间以及通过多导睡眠图或四种标准睡眠量表进行的术前/术后睡眠测量。采用 Cochrane 方法评估 RCT,使用了偏倚风险评估、数据综合和统计方法,包括森林图(风险比;M-H 随机效应;95% CI):63项研究被纳入总体分析,代表了3022名患者。在眼下核(STN)DBS治疗帕金森病(PD)的亚组荟萃分析中,患者在术后3个月而非12个月时的PDSS、12个月而非3个月时的Epworth睡眠量表以及6个月时的非运动症状量表均显示出显著的睡眠改善。匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)显示,睡眠在任何时候都没有明显改善。在 6 个月时,双侧 DBS 对 PSQI 的改善明显多于单侧 DBS,但在 3 个月时则不然。多导睡眠监测显示,1 周后睡眠有明显改善,但 3 个月或 6 个月后无明显改善。大多数研究显示,苍白球内肌、丘脑中央和腹侧中间核 DBS 对睡眠没有明显改善:STN-DBS治疗帕金森病可能会改善睡眠;然而,需要对睡眠量表结果报告和随访时间进行显著的标准化,以有效确定DBS手术对睡眠的靶向效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of deep brain stimulation on sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a standard treatment for movement disorders, epilepsy, and others, yet its influence on postprocedural sleep quality remains an under-researched topic.

Study objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all DBS effects on sleep.

Methods: The use of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA) was utilized. We extracted demographic data, disease type/duration, DBS target, stimulation laterality (unilateral vs bilateral), follow-up lengths, and sleep pre/post-op measurements with polysomnography or across four standard sleep scales. The Cochrane methodology for evaluating RCTs was employed using the risk of bias assessments, data synthesis, and statistical methods, including forest plots (risk ratio; M-H random effects; 95% CI).

Results: Sixty-three studies were included in the overall analysis, representing 3022 patients. In a subgroup meta-analysis of subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD), patients showed significant sleep improvement at three but not 12 months postoperatively with PDSS, at 12 but not 3 months with Epworth sleep scale, and at 6 months with nonmotor symptom scale. Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) showed no significant improvement in sleep at any time. Bilateral DBS showed significantly more improvement than unilateral DBS in the PSQI at 6 but not 3 months. Polysomnography showed significant sleep improvement at 1 week but not at 3 or 6 months. Most studies showed no significant sleep improvement for globus pallidus internus, centromedian thalamus, and ventral intermediate nucleus DBS.

Conclusions: STN-DBS for PD likely improves sleep; however, significant standardization in sleep scale outcome reporting and follow-up time is needed to effectively determine the target-dependent effects of DBS surgery on sleep.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A life of research on everyday sleep(iness). How openness and inquisitiveness led to a career as a sleep researcher and a broad contribution to sleep science. How did I come to sleep research and stay there? Looking beyond sleep duration in understanding obesity risk in adolescents: the role of circadian timing and misalignment on adolescent dietary outcomes, physical activity, and body mass index. The relationships between wanting to nap, actually napping, and depressed and anxious mood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1