Carson Shin, Jun Yeon Kim, Jee Yeon Lee, Dong Kyu Lee, Hye Ah Joo, Yun Ji Lee, Yeonjoo Choi, Hong Ju Park
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入术语音处理器升级后的语音感知能力和主观满意度。","authors":"Carson Shin, Jun Yeon Kim, Jee Yeon Lee, Dong Kyu Lee, Hye Ah Joo, Yun Ji Lee, Yeonjoo Choi, Hong Ju Park","doi":"10.1177/01455613241272467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Cochlear implant (CI) users face the decision of whether to upgrade to a new sound processor (SP) with technological advances. We wanted to assess the changes of speech perception ability and aided hearing thresholds as well as subjective satisfaction after upgrade to a new SP. <b>Methods:</b> Fifty-five patients who have used CI for 10 years or more and upgraded to a new SP were enrolled. Word recognition scores were assessed before the upgrade and compared to those assessed 1 year after the upgrade to the Nucleus 7 SP. Changes of aided hearing thresholds and C- and T-levels were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Previous SPs were 3G in 5, Freedom in 40, N5 in 24, and N6 in 6. Speech perception remained relatively unaffected by SP upgrade. The C- and T-levels increased after SP upgrading and the aided thresholds with previous generation SPs were higher than those 1 year after SP upgrading at all frequencies. In questionnaires, subjects felt that there was a definite subjective benefit to upgrading while most (60%) felt no difference regarding the communication in noise. <b>Conclusions:</b> Speech perception remained similar, but there were improved hearing sensitivity and better satisfaction after SP upgrade.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613241272467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech Perception Ability and Subjective Satisfaction After Upgrade of Speech Processor in Cochlear Implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Carson Shin, Jun Yeon Kim, Jee Yeon Lee, Dong Kyu Lee, Hye Ah Joo, Yun Ji Lee, Yeonjoo Choi, Hong Ju Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613241272467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Cochlear implant (CI) users face the decision of whether to upgrade to a new sound processor (SP) with technological advances. We wanted to assess the changes of speech perception ability and aided hearing thresholds as well as subjective satisfaction after upgrade to a new SP. <b>Methods:</b> Fifty-five patients who have used CI for 10 years or more and upgraded to a new SP were enrolled. Word recognition scores were assessed before the upgrade and compared to those assessed 1 year after the upgrade to the Nucleus 7 SP. Changes of aided hearing thresholds and C- and T-levels were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Previous SPs were 3G in 5, Freedom in 40, N5 in 24, and N6 in 6. Speech perception remained relatively unaffected by SP upgrade. The C- and T-levels increased after SP upgrading and the aided thresholds with previous generation SPs were higher than those 1 year after SP upgrading at all frequencies. In questionnaires, subjects felt that there was a definite subjective benefit to upgrading while most (60%) felt no difference regarding the communication in noise. <b>Conclusions:</b> Speech perception remained similar, but there were improved hearing sensitivity and better satisfaction after SP upgrade.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1455613241272467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241272467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241272467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Speech Perception Ability and Subjective Satisfaction After Upgrade of Speech Processor in Cochlear Implantation.
Objective: Cochlear implant (CI) users face the decision of whether to upgrade to a new sound processor (SP) with technological advances. We wanted to assess the changes of speech perception ability and aided hearing thresholds as well as subjective satisfaction after upgrade to a new SP. Methods: Fifty-five patients who have used CI for 10 years or more and upgraded to a new SP were enrolled. Word recognition scores were assessed before the upgrade and compared to those assessed 1 year after the upgrade to the Nucleus 7 SP. Changes of aided hearing thresholds and C- and T-levels were analyzed. Results: Previous SPs were 3G in 5, Freedom in 40, N5 in 24, and N6 in 6. Speech perception remained relatively unaffected by SP upgrade. The C- and T-levels increased after SP upgrading and the aided thresholds with previous generation SPs were higher than those 1 year after SP upgrading at all frequencies. In questionnaires, subjects felt that there was a definite subjective benefit to upgrading while most (60%) felt no difference regarding the communication in noise. Conclusions: Speech perception remained similar, but there were improved hearing sensitivity and better satisfaction after SP upgrade.