临床医生的不连续性与疗养院居民疗效之间的关系。

Hyunkyung Yun, Mark Aaron Unruh, Kira L Ryskina, Hye-Young Jung
{"title":"临床医生的不连续性与疗养院居民疗效之间的关系。","authors":"Hyunkyung Yun, Mark Aaron Unruh, Kira L Ryskina, Hye-Young Jung","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about the impact of clinician discontinuity on quality of care for nursing home residents. We examined the association between clinician discontinuity and outcomes of residents with long-term care stays up to 3 years using claims for a national 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 2014 through 2019. We used an event study analysis that accounted for staggered treatment timing. Estimates were adjusted for resident, clinician, and nursing home characteristics. Three sensitivity analyses were conducted. The first excluded small nursing homes, which were in the lowest quartile based on the number of beds. The second attributed residents to clinician practices rather than individual clinicians. The third removed the 3-year long-term care stay restriction. We found that, compared to residents who did not experience a clinician change, those with a clinician change had a 0.7 percentage point higher likelihood of an ambulatory care sensitive hospitalization in a given quarter (a 36.8% relative increase). Clinician discontinuity was not associated with ambulatory care sensitive emergency department visits. Results from our 3 sensitivity analyses were consistent with those from the primary analysis. Policymakers may consider using continuity in clinicians as a marker of nursing home quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 11","pages":"qxae139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between discontinuity in clinicians and outcomes of nursing home residents.\",\"authors\":\"Hyunkyung Yun, Mark Aaron Unruh, Kira L Ryskina, Hye-Young Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Little is known about the impact of clinician discontinuity on quality of care for nursing home residents. We examined the association between clinician discontinuity and outcomes of residents with long-term care stays up to 3 years using claims for a national 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 2014 through 2019. We used an event study analysis that accounted for staggered treatment timing. Estimates were adjusted for resident, clinician, and nursing home characteristics. Three sensitivity analyses were conducted. The first excluded small nursing homes, which were in the lowest quartile based on the number of beds. The second attributed residents to clinician practices rather than individual clinicians. The third removed the 3-year long-term care stay restriction. We found that, compared to residents who did not experience a clinician change, those with a clinician change had a 0.7 percentage point higher likelihood of an ambulatory care sensitive hospitalization in a given quarter (a 36.8% relative increase). Clinician discontinuity was not associated with ambulatory care sensitive emergency department visits. Results from our 3 sensitivity analyses were consistent with those from the primary analysis. Policymakers may consider using continuity in clinicians as a marker of nursing home quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"2 11\",\"pages\":\"qxae139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对临床医生不连续工作对养老院居民护理质量的影响知之甚少。我们利用 2014 年至 2019 年期间全国 20% 的医疗保险付费服务受益人样本的报销申请,研究了临床医生不连续与长期护理住院长达 3 年的居民的护理结果之间的关联。我们采用了事件研究分析法,考虑到了治疗时间的交错。估计值根据居民、临床医生和疗养院的特征进行了调整。我们进行了三项敏感性分析。第一项分析排除了小型疗养院,这些疗养院的床位数处于最低四分位数。第二项分析将住院患者归因于临床医生的临床实践,而非临床医生个人。第三种方法取消了 3 年长期护理住院的限制。我们发现,与未更换临床医生的居民相比,更换过临床医生的居民在特定季度内发生非卧床护理敏感性住院的可能性要高出 0.7 个百分点(相对增加 36.8%)。临床医生不连续与非卧床护理敏感性急诊就诊无关。我们的 3 项敏感性分析结果与主要分析结果一致。政策制定者可以考虑将临床医生的连续性作为衡量疗养院质量的一个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between discontinuity in clinicians and outcomes of nursing home residents.

Little is known about the impact of clinician discontinuity on quality of care for nursing home residents. We examined the association between clinician discontinuity and outcomes of residents with long-term care stays up to 3 years using claims for a national 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 2014 through 2019. We used an event study analysis that accounted for staggered treatment timing. Estimates were adjusted for resident, clinician, and nursing home characteristics. Three sensitivity analyses were conducted. The first excluded small nursing homes, which were in the lowest quartile based on the number of beds. The second attributed residents to clinician practices rather than individual clinicians. The third removed the 3-year long-term care stay restriction. We found that, compared to residents who did not experience a clinician change, those with a clinician change had a 0.7 percentage point higher likelihood of an ambulatory care sensitive hospitalization in a given quarter (a 36.8% relative increase). Clinician discontinuity was not associated with ambulatory care sensitive emergency department visits. Results from our 3 sensitivity analyses were consistent with those from the primary analysis. Policymakers may consider using continuity in clinicians as a marker of nursing home quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States. Examining the use of telehealth to initiate buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1