极性编码连续取消翻转解码的灵活重启机制

IF 3.7 3区 计算机科学 Q2 TELECOMMUNICATIONS IEEE Communications Letters Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3465393
Xue Xiyue;He Meilin;Guo Rui
{"title":"极性编码连续取消翻转解码的灵活重启机制","authors":"Xue Xiyue;He Meilin;Guo Rui","doi":"10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3465393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polar codes can achieve near-capacity performance under low-complexity successive cancellation (SC) decoding. However, short to medium-length block codes exhibit insufficient error-correction performance with the SC algorithm, which limits their practical applications. Although the successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoder improves SC performance, its variable execution time poses challenges in certain scenarios. The simplified restart mechanism (SRM) reduces the execution time of SCF decoders through conditional restart of the additional trials from the second half of the codeword. However, regardless of the position of the flipped bit on the RHS, additional decoding trials can only start from a fixed restart position, which limits efficiency improvements. This letter proposes a flexible restart mechanism (FRM), introducing multiple optional restart positions to further optimize the simplified restart mechanism, reducing both execution time and its variability. In simulations, we used P(1024, 128) and P(2048, 256) polar codes to compare the performance of SCF decoders embedding with FRM and SRM. The results indicate that, compared to the SCF decoder, the SCF decoder with FRM reduces average execution time, average additional execution time, execution time variance, and median additional execution time by 14.95%, 63.42%, 86.55%, and 58.20%, respectively. Compared to the SCF decoder embedding with SRM, FRM achieves improvements in these metrics by 5.15%, 23.14%, 20.24%, and 29.71%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":13197,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Communications Letters","volume":"28 11","pages":"2459-2463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible Restart Mechanism for Successive Cancellation Flip Decoding of Polar Codes\",\"authors\":\"Xue Xiyue;He Meilin;Guo Rui\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3465393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polar codes can achieve near-capacity performance under low-complexity successive cancellation (SC) decoding. However, short to medium-length block codes exhibit insufficient error-correction performance with the SC algorithm, which limits their practical applications. Although the successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoder improves SC performance, its variable execution time poses challenges in certain scenarios. The simplified restart mechanism (SRM) reduces the execution time of SCF decoders through conditional restart of the additional trials from the second half of the codeword. However, regardless of the position of the flipped bit on the RHS, additional decoding trials can only start from a fixed restart position, which limits efficiency improvements. This letter proposes a flexible restart mechanism (FRM), introducing multiple optional restart positions to further optimize the simplified restart mechanism, reducing both execution time and its variability. In simulations, we used P(1024, 128) and P(2048, 256) polar codes to compare the performance of SCF decoders embedding with FRM and SRM. The results indicate that, compared to the SCF decoder, the SCF decoder with FRM reduces average execution time, average additional execution time, execution time variance, and median additional execution time by 14.95%, 63.42%, 86.55%, and 58.20%, respectively. Compared to the SCF decoder embedding with SRM, FRM achieves improvements in these metrics by 5.15%, 23.14%, 20.24%, and 29.71%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Communications Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 11\",\"pages\":\"2459-2463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Communications Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10693474/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TELECOMMUNICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Communications Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10693474/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TELECOMMUNICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

极性编码能在低复杂度连续消隐(SC)解码下实现接近容量的性能。然而,中短码块在 SC 算法下的纠错性能不足,限制了其实际应用。虽然连续消隐翻转(SCF)解码器提高了 SC 性能,但其可变的执行时间在某些情况下带来了挑战。简化重启机制(SRM)通过有条件地重启编码后半部分的附加试验,缩短了 SCF 解码器的执行时间。然而,无论翻转位在 RHS 上的位置如何,额外的解码试验只能从固定的重启位置开始,这限制了效率的提高。这封信提出了一种灵活的重启机制(FRM),引入多个可选的重启位置,进一步优化简化的重启机制,减少执行时间及其可变性。在仿真中,我们使用 P(1024, 128) 和 P(2048, 256) 极码比较了嵌入 FRM 和 SRM 的 SCF 解码器的性能。结果表明,与 SCF 解码器相比,嵌入 FRM 的 SCF 解码器的平均执行时间、平均额外执行时间、执行时间方差和额外执行时间中值分别缩短了 14.95%、63.42%、86.55% 和 58.20%。与嵌入 SRM 的 SCF 解码器相比,FRM 在这些指标上分别提高了 5.15%、23.14%、20.24% 和 29.71%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flexible Restart Mechanism for Successive Cancellation Flip Decoding of Polar Codes
Polar codes can achieve near-capacity performance under low-complexity successive cancellation (SC) decoding. However, short to medium-length block codes exhibit insufficient error-correction performance with the SC algorithm, which limits their practical applications. Although the successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoder improves SC performance, its variable execution time poses challenges in certain scenarios. The simplified restart mechanism (SRM) reduces the execution time of SCF decoders through conditional restart of the additional trials from the second half of the codeword. However, regardless of the position of the flipped bit on the RHS, additional decoding trials can only start from a fixed restart position, which limits efficiency improvements. This letter proposes a flexible restart mechanism (FRM), introducing multiple optional restart positions to further optimize the simplified restart mechanism, reducing both execution time and its variability. In simulations, we used P(1024, 128) and P(2048, 256) polar codes to compare the performance of SCF decoders embedding with FRM and SRM. The results indicate that, compared to the SCF decoder, the SCF decoder with FRM reduces average execution time, average additional execution time, execution time variance, and median additional execution time by 14.95%, 63.42%, 86.55%, and 58.20%, respectively. Compared to the SCF decoder embedding with SRM, FRM achieves improvements in these metrics by 5.15%, 23.14%, 20.24%, and 29.71%, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Communications Letters
IEEE Communications Letters 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
590
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Communications Letters publishes short papers in a rapid publication cycle on advances in the state-of-the-art of communication over different media and channels including wire, underground, waveguide, optical fiber, and storage channels. Both theoretical contributions (including new techniques, concepts, and analyses) and practical contributions (including system experiments and prototypes, and new applications) are encouraged. This journal focuses on the physical layer and the link layer of communication systems.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Communications Letters Publication Information IEEE Communications Society Information Table of Contents IEEE Communications Letters Publication Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1