UPUCS:地下商业空间用户感知舒适度的空间评估

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2024.106169
Yangbin Zhang , Zhiqiang Xie , Xiaoqing Zhao , Junwei Pu , Yuenan Wang , Bo Xiong
{"title":"UPUCS:地下商业空间用户感知舒适度的空间评估","authors":"Yangbin Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Xie ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Zhao ,&nbsp;Junwei Pu ,&nbsp;Yuenan Wang ,&nbsp;Bo Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With underground commercial space (UCS) increasingly becoming an essential area in the daily life of citizens, how to spatially quantify users’ comfort in underground commercial space and enhance the willingness of users to use underground facilities has become an urgent problem that needs to be solved. In order to improve the Perceptual impression of UCS and quantitatively assess users’ Perception level when they are in UCS from a spatial perspective, this paper constructs a User Perception of the Underground Commercial Space (UPUCS) framework. Taking the subway commercial space of Beiyun in Kunming, China, as an example, a questionnaire survey was conducted to understand users’ needs, and the perception of comfort of underground space was quantitatively evaluated from three dimensions: sensory, psychological, and device. The priority of indexes is defined by combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the importance-performance analysis (IPA). To put forward specific improvement suggestions for each index, 1 m × 1 m fine sensing grid unit was used for spatial analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) Device perception is the most concerned dimension of Beiyun users. (2) The average score of users’ satisfaction with the indexes in the research area (Performance) was 4.085, and the average index weight (Importance) was 0.083. Most indexes are below-average satisfaction and need to be improved. (3) The spatial analysis results show that 28 key low-performance areas in Beiyun affect users’ willingness to use UCS. (4) The analysis of the perception index combined with spatial quantification can help to put forward targeted suggestions for improvement. Based on the UPUCS spatial analysis results, this paper can provide specific suggestions for UCS improvement and help build the UCS desired by users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 106169"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UPUCS: Spatial evaluation of user-perceived comfort in underground commercial space\",\"authors\":\"Yangbin Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Xie ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Zhao ,&nbsp;Junwei Pu ,&nbsp;Yuenan Wang ,&nbsp;Bo Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With underground commercial space (UCS) increasingly becoming an essential area in the daily life of citizens, how to spatially quantify users’ comfort in underground commercial space and enhance the willingness of users to use underground facilities has become an urgent problem that needs to be solved. In order to improve the Perceptual impression of UCS and quantitatively assess users’ Perception level when they are in UCS from a spatial perspective, this paper constructs a User Perception of the Underground Commercial Space (UPUCS) framework. Taking the subway commercial space of Beiyun in Kunming, China, as an example, a questionnaire survey was conducted to understand users’ needs, and the perception of comfort of underground space was quantitatively evaluated from three dimensions: sensory, psychological, and device. The priority of indexes is defined by combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the importance-performance analysis (IPA). To put forward specific improvement suggestions for each index, 1 m × 1 m fine sensing grid unit was used for spatial analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) Device perception is the most concerned dimension of Beiyun users. (2) The average score of users’ satisfaction with the indexes in the research area (Performance) was 4.085, and the average index weight (Importance) was 0.083. Most indexes are below-average satisfaction and need to be improved. (3) The spatial analysis results show that 28 key low-performance areas in Beiyun affect users’ willingness to use UCS. (4) The analysis of the perception index combined with spatial quantification can help to put forward targeted suggestions for improvement. Based on the UPUCS spatial analysis results, this paper can provide specific suggestions for UCS improvement and help build the UCS desired by users.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088677982400587X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088677982400587X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着地下商业空间(UCS)日益成为市民日常生活中不可或缺的区域,如何从空间上量化用户在地下商业空间的舒适度,提高用户使用地下设施的意愿,已成为亟待解决的问题。为了改善用户对地下商业空间的感知印象,从空间角度定量评估用户在地下商业空间的感知水平,本文构建了用户感知地下商业空间(UPUCS)框架。以中国昆明北云地铁商业空间为例,通过问卷调查了解用户需求,并从感官、心理和设备三个维度对地下空间舒适度进行量化评估。结合层次分析法(AHP)和重要性-绩效分析法(IPA)确定指标的优先级。为了对每项指标提出具体的改进建议,采用 1 m × 1 m 的精细传感网格单元进行空间分析。研究结果如下(1)设备感知是北云用户最关注的维度。(2)用户对研究领域指标满意度(性能)的平均得分为 4.085,指标权重(重要性)的平均得分为 0.083。大部分指标的满意度低于平均值,需要改进。(3) 空间分析结果显示,北云 28 个重点低性能区域影响了用户使用统一通信系统的意愿。(4) 感知指数分析与空间量化相结合,有助于提出有针对性的改进建议。基于UPUCS的空间分析结果,本文可以为UCS的改进提供具体建议,帮助建设用户期望的UCS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UPUCS: Spatial evaluation of user-perceived comfort in underground commercial space
With underground commercial space (UCS) increasingly becoming an essential area in the daily life of citizens, how to spatially quantify users’ comfort in underground commercial space and enhance the willingness of users to use underground facilities has become an urgent problem that needs to be solved. In order to improve the Perceptual impression of UCS and quantitatively assess users’ Perception level when they are in UCS from a spatial perspective, this paper constructs a User Perception of the Underground Commercial Space (UPUCS) framework. Taking the subway commercial space of Beiyun in Kunming, China, as an example, a questionnaire survey was conducted to understand users’ needs, and the perception of comfort of underground space was quantitatively evaluated from three dimensions: sensory, psychological, and device. The priority of indexes is defined by combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the importance-performance analysis (IPA). To put forward specific improvement suggestions for each index, 1 m × 1 m fine sensing grid unit was used for spatial analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) Device perception is the most concerned dimension of Beiyun users. (2) The average score of users’ satisfaction with the indexes in the research area (Performance) was 4.085, and the average index weight (Importance) was 0.083. Most indexes are below-average satisfaction and need to be improved. (3) The spatial analysis results show that 28 key low-performance areas in Beiyun affect users’ willingness to use UCS. (4) The analysis of the perception index combined with spatial quantification can help to put forward targeted suggestions for improvement. Based on the UPUCS spatial analysis results, this paper can provide specific suggestions for UCS improvement and help build the UCS desired by users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
期刊最新文献
Seismic performance of tunnels and verification of available seismic risk models for the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes Experimental investigation on the evacuation performance of pedestrians in an underwater shield tunnel with evacuation stairs in a fire scenario Spatiotemporal evolution of surface deformation based on MT-InSAR and mechanism analysis along Zhengzhou Metro, China Flame behavior and maximum ceiling temperature in traffic merging section tunnel fires: An experimental study and engineering modelling methodology Investigation on effect of pavement material on obstacle visibility and lighting energy consumption in road tunnel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1