硝化膜充气生物膜中的磺胺甲噁唑去除率:生理反应和抗生素耐药基因。

IF 7.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Research Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2024.120365
Gaoxiang Chen, Rongchang Wang, Luyao Ying, Iyobosa Eheneden, Haijing Ren, Maoxin Sun
{"title":"硝化膜充气生物膜中的磺胺甲噁唑去除率:生理反应和抗生素耐药基因。","authors":"Gaoxiang Chen, Rongchang Wang, Luyao Ying, Iyobosa Eheneden, Haijing Ren, Maoxin Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2024.120365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient removal of ammonia nitrogen and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) from wastewater has become increasingly critical due to their detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems and public health. This study aimed to investigate the nitrogen transformation and SMX removal in a membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) under different SMX concentrations (0 ∼ 200 μg·L<sup>-1</sup>) with a nitrifying membrane bioreactor (MBR) as a control. Results suggested that SMX removal in MABR was better than that of MBR with SMX addition (50 ∼ 200 μg·L<sup>-1</sup>). Membrane aerated biofilms tended to secrete more extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and generate less antioxidant enzymes in response to SMX stress when compared with nitrifying sludge in MBR. Metagenomic analysis indicated that distinct succession of microbial community was observed in both systems after SMX addition, and the relative abundance of nitrifying bacteria (Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira, and Nitrobacter) evidently decreased under SMX concentration of 200 μg·L<sup>-1</sup>. The proliferation of predominant antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) sul2 was suppressed more obviously in MABR than that in MBR. Thus, this study provided extensive insights into the advantages of nitrifying MABR in simultaneous removal of ammonium and antibiotics with less risk of associated ARGs spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":" ","pages":"120365"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sulfamethoxazole removal in nitrifying membrane aerated biofilms: Physiological responses and antibiotic resistance genes.\",\"authors\":\"Gaoxiang Chen, Rongchang Wang, Luyao Ying, Iyobosa Eheneden, Haijing Ren, Maoxin Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envres.2024.120365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Efficient removal of ammonia nitrogen and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) from wastewater has become increasingly critical due to their detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems and public health. This study aimed to investigate the nitrogen transformation and SMX removal in a membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) under different SMX concentrations (0 ∼ 200 μg·L<sup>-1</sup>) with a nitrifying membrane bioreactor (MBR) as a control. Results suggested that SMX removal in MABR was better than that of MBR with SMX addition (50 ∼ 200 μg·L<sup>-1</sup>). Membrane aerated biofilms tended to secrete more extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and generate less antioxidant enzymes in response to SMX stress when compared with nitrifying sludge in MBR. Metagenomic analysis indicated that distinct succession of microbial community was observed in both systems after SMX addition, and the relative abundance of nitrifying bacteria (Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira, and Nitrobacter) evidently decreased under SMX concentration of 200 μg·L<sup>-1</sup>. The proliferation of predominant antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) sul2 was suppressed more obviously in MABR than that in MBR. Thus, this study provided extensive insights into the advantages of nitrifying MABR in simultaneous removal of ammonium and antibiotics with less risk of associated ARGs spread.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"120365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120365\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于氨氮和磺胺甲噁唑(SMX)对水生生态系统和公众健康的有害影响,有效去除废水中的氨氮和磺胺甲噁唑变得越来越重要。本研究旨在调查不同 SMX 浓度(0 ∼ 200 μg-L-1)下膜充气生物膜反应器(MABR)的氮转化和 SMX 去除情况,并以硝化膜生物反应器(MBR)作为对照。结果表明,MABR 对 SMX 的去除效果优于添加 SMX 的 MBR(50 ∼ 200 μg-L-1)。与 MBR 中的硝化污泥相比,膜充气生物膜在 SMX 压力下倾向于分泌更多的胞外聚合物质(EPS)和产生更少的抗氧化酶。元基因组分析表明,添加 SMX 后,两个系统中的微生物群落都发生了明显的演替,在 SMX 浓度为 200 μg-L-1 时,硝化细菌(亚硝化单胞菌、亚硝化细菌和硝化细菌)的相对丰度明显下降。在 MABR 中,主要抗生素耐药基因(ARG)sul2 的增殖比在 MBR 中受到更明显的抑制。因此,这项研究为硝化 MABR 在同时去除氨氮和抗生素以及降低相关 ARGs 扩散风险方面的优势提供了广泛的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sulfamethoxazole removal in nitrifying membrane aerated biofilms: Physiological responses and antibiotic resistance genes.

Efficient removal of ammonia nitrogen and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) from wastewater has become increasingly critical due to their detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems and public health. This study aimed to investigate the nitrogen transformation and SMX removal in a membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) under different SMX concentrations (0 ∼ 200 μg·L-1) with a nitrifying membrane bioreactor (MBR) as a control. Results suggested that SMX removal in MABR was better than that of MBR with SMX addition (50 ∼ 200 μg·L-1). Membrane aerated biofilms tended to secrete more extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and generate less antioxidant enzymes in response to SMX stress when compared with nitrifying sludge in MBR. Metagenomic analysis indicated that distinct succession of microbial community was observed in both systems after SMX addition, and the relative abundance of nitrifying bacteria (Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira, and Nitrobacter) evidently decreased under SMX concentration of 200 μg·L-1. The proliferation of predominant antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) sul2 was suppressed more obviously in MABR than that in MBR. Thus, this study provided extensive insights into the advantages of nitrifying MABR in simultaneous removal of ammonium and antibiotics with less risk of associated ARGs spread.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research
Environmental Research 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
8.40%
发文量
2480
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "A GIS-based modified PAP/RAC model and Caesium-137 approach for water erosion assessment in the Raouz catchment, Morocco" [Environ. Res. 251 (2024) 118460]. Corrigendum to 'Coastal flood risk assessment using ensemble multi-criteria decision-making with machine learning approaches' [Environ. Res., 245 (2024), 118042]. A phenotypic study of the resistome in a peri-urban ecosystem. New insight into linear substituents influencing electrooxidation treatment of sulfonamide antibiotics: Linking kinetics, pathways, toxicity, and active species with density functional theory. Comprehensive assessment of potential toxic elements in surface dust of community playgrounds in Xi'an, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1