评估阿达木单抗生物仿制药 Adalimumab-WIBP 和 Humira® 生物等效性的 I 期临床试验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1007/s40261-024-01409-4
Shengling Hu, Yang Liu, Lu Yang, Yunkai Yang, Feiguang Long, Hongying Bao, Huijun Zhang, Xin Yue, Jiayou Zhang, Zejun Wang, Chaolin Huang, Jingli Wang, Liu Xia, Yongbing Pan, Yuntao Zhang, Fengyun Gong
{"title":"评估阿达木单抗生物仿制药 Adalimumab-WIBP 和 Humira® 生物等效性的 I 期临床试验。","authors":"Shengling Hu, Yang Liu, Lu Yang, Yunkai Yang, Feiguang Long, Hongying Bao, Huijun Zhang, Xin Yue, Jiayou Zhang, Zejun Wang, Chaolin Huang, Jingli Wang, Liu Xia, Yongbing Pan, Yuntao Zhang, Fengyun Gong","doi":"10.1007/s40261-024-01409-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The high costs associated with biological agents often limit accessibility for many patients, whereas biosimilars allow the wider application of biological treatment. The objectives of this phase I clinical trial were to compare the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of the biosimilar adalimumab-WIBP and the reference product Humira<sup>®</sup> and to assess the precision of the bioequivalence evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group bioequivalence study, 164 healthy male Chinese participants were selected and randomly divided into two groups on a 1:1 ratio. The subjects were administered a single 40 mg subcutaneous dose of either adalimumab-WIBP or Humira<sup>®</sup>. Blood samples extracted at multiple intervals after administration were analyzed to interpret pharmacokinetic parameters, and any adverse events were documented. Alongside ensuring safety measures, the subjects were monitored for immunogenicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pharmacokinetic results demonstrated similar serum concentration-time curves in both groups. There were no significant differences in safety and no differences in immunogenicity profiles between the two groups. The bioequivalence was confirmed: the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of the main pharmacokinetic parameters was within the range of 80-125%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The trial indicated the bioequivalence between adalimumab-WIBP and the reference product Humira<sup>®</sup> based on pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety profile. These findings reinforce the use of the adalimumab-WIBP biosimilar as a possible therapeutic alternative to Humira<sup>®</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of an Adalimumab Biosimilar Adalimumab-WIBP and Humira<sup>®</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Shengling Hu, Yang Liu, Lu Yang, Yunkai Yang, Feiguang Long, Hongying Bao, Huijun Zhang, Xin Yue, Jiayou Zhang, Zejun Wang, Chaolin Huang, Jingli Wang, Liu Xia, Yongbing Pan, Yuntao Zhang, Fengyun Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40261-024-01409-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The high costs associated with biological agents often limit accessibility for many patients, whereas biosimilars allow the wider application of biological treatment. The objectives of this phase I clinical trial were to compare the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of the biosimilar adalimumab-WIBP and the reference product Humira<sup>®</sup> and to assess the precision of the bioequivalence evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group bioequivalence study, 164 healthy male Chinese participants were selected and randomly divided into two groups on a 1:1 ratio. The subjects were administered a single 40 mg subcutaneous dose of either adalimumab-WIBP or Humira<sup>®</sup>. Blood samples extracted at multiple intervals after administration were analyzed to interpret pharmacokinetic parameters, and any adverse events were documented. Alongside ensuring safety measures, the subjects were monitored for immunogenicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pharmacokinetic results demonstrated similar serum concentration-time curves in both groups. There were no significant differences in safety and no differences in immunogenicity profiles between the two groups. The bioequivalence was confirmed: the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of the main pharmacokinetic parameters was within the range of 80-125%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The trial indicated the bioequivalence between adalimumab-WIBP and the reference product Humira<sup>®</sup> based on pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety profile. These findings reinforce the use of the adalimumab-WIBP biosimilar as a possible therapeutic alternative to Humira<sup>®</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01409-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01409-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:与生物制剂相关的高昂费用往往限制了许多患者对生物制剂的使用,而生物仿制药则可以使生物治疗得到更广泛的应用。这项 I 期临床试验的目的是比较阿达木单抗生物仿制药 WIBP 和参比产品 Humira® 的药代动力学、免疫原性和安全性,并评估生物等效性评价的精确性:在这项随机、双盲、平行组生物等效性研究中,我们选取了164名健康的中国男性受试者,按1:1的比例随机分为两组。受试者单次皮下注射40毫克阿达木单抗-WIBP或Humira®。在给药后多次抽取血液样本进行分析,以解读药代动力学参数,并记录任何不良事件。在确保安全的同时,还对受试者进行了免疫原性监测:药代动力学结果显示,两组受试者的血清浓度-时间曲线相似。结果:药代动力学结果表明,两组受试者的血清浓度-时间曲线相似,安全性无明显差异,免疫原性也无差异。生物等效性得到证实:主要药代动力学参数几何平均比的 90% 置信区间在 80-125% 之间:试验表明,根据药代动力学、免疫原性和安全性分析,阿达木单抗-WIBP与参比产品Humira®具有生物等效性。这些发现加强了阿达木单抗-WIBP生物类似药作为Humira®治疗替代品的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of an Adalimumab Biosimilar Adalimumab-WIBP and Humira®.

Background and objectives: The high costs associated with biological agents often limit accessibility for many patients, whereas biosimilars allow the wider application of biological treatment. The objectives of this phase I clinical trial were to compare the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of the biosimilar adalimumab-WIBP and the reference product Humira® and to assess the precision of the bioequivalence evaluation.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group bioequivalence study, 164 healthy male Chinese participants were selected and randomly divided into two groups on a 1:1 ratio. The subjects were administered a single 40 mg subcutaneous dose of either adalimumab-WIBP or Humira®. Blood samples extracted at multiple intervals after administration were analyzed to interpret pharmacokinetic parameters, and any adverse events were documented. Alongside ensuring safety measures, the subjects were monitored for immunogenicity.

Results: The pharmacokinetic results demonstrated similar serum concentration-time curves in both groups. There were no significant differences in safety and no differences in immunogenicity profiles between the two groups. The bioequivalence was confirmed: the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of the main pharmacokinetic parameters was within the range of 80-125%.

Conclusion: The trial indicated the bioequivalence between adalimumab-WIBP and the reference product Humira® based on pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety profile. These findings reinforce the use of the adalimumab-WIBP biosimilar as a possible therapeutic alternative to Humira®.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
A Network Meta-Analysis of Vasodilator Therapies in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery: Insights for Optimizing Hemodynamics. A Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of an Adalimumab Biosimilar Adalimumab-WIBP and Humira®. A Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability, Safety, and Tolerability of Monthly Extended-Release Buprenorphine at Alternative Injection Locations in Adult Participants with Opioid Use Disorder. Efficacy of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose in Heart Failure Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-analysis of 6271 Patients. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1